Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People who know SLAC’s in general tend to be among the highly intellectual crowd, not your garden variety DMV dummy. Grad schools and employers also know these colleges to have excellent reputations. IYKYK.
They can feel your sneer all the way over in West Virginia.
Anonymous wrote:People who know SLAC’s in general tend to be among the highly intellectual crowd, not your garden variety DMV dummy. Grad schools and employers also know these colleges to have excellent reputations. IYKYK.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People who know SLAC’s in general tend to be among the highly intellectual crowd, not your garden variety DMV dummy. Grad schools and employers also know these colleges to have excellent reputations. IYKYK.
A awful lot of them tend to be monied parents with private school kids who think sending their kid to a SLAC is a good way to avoid questions about why their kid didn’t get into a top university. That’s hardly a highly intellectual decision.
My kid chose a WASP over Johns Hopkins- so try again…
My daughter’s best friend also chose Amherst over Johns Hopkins last spring. The kids were shocked but I thought it was a smart decision and great fit.
Shocked that the examples involve Johns Hopkins. Now try that with Yale.
Yale is for Harvard rejects
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People who know SLAC’s in general tend to be among the highly intellectual crowd, not your garden variety DMV dummy. Grad schools and employers also know these colleges to have excellent reputations. IYKYK.
A awful lot of them tend to be monied parents with private school kids who think sending their kid to a SLAC is a good way to avoid questions about why their kid didn’t get into a top university. That’s hardly a highly intellectual decision.
My kid chose a WASP over Johns Hopkins- so try again…
My daughter’s best friend also chose Amherst over Johns Hopkins last spring. The kids were shocked but I thought it was a smart decision and great fit.
Shocked that the examples involve Johns Hopkins. Now try that with Yale.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People who know SLAC’s in general tend to be among the highly intellectual crowd, not your garden variety DMV dummy. Grad schools and employers also know these colleges to have excellent reputations. IYKYK.
A awful lot of them tend to be monied parents with private school kids who think sending their kid to a SLAC is a good way to avoid questions about why their kid didn’t get into a top university. That’s hardly a highly intellectual decision.
My kid chose a WASP over Johns Hopkins- so try again…
My daughter’s best friend also chose Amherst over Johns Hopkins last spring. The kids were shocked but I thought it was a smart decision and great fit.
Anonymous wrote:Ours declined due to high cost of attendance as full pay but I liked Amherst very much other than few things like harsh weather, athlete-non athlete divide, lack of eating out options, gay-straight divide and racial divide at Amherst. Obviously hard to judge in single short visit but that's the impression I had.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People who know SLAC’s in general tend to be among the highly intellectual crowd, not your garden variety DMV dummy. Grad schools and employers also know these colleges to have excellent reputations. IYKYK.
A awful lot of them tend to be monied parents with private school kids who think sending their kid to a SLAC is a good way to avoid questions about why their kid didn’t get into a top university. That’s hardly a highly intellectual decision.
My kid chose a WASP over Johns Hopkins- so try again…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People who know SLAC’s in general tend to be among the highly intellectual crowd, not your garden variety DMV dummy. Grad schools and employers also know these colleges to have excellent reputations. IYKYK.
A awful lot of them tend to be monied parents with private school kids who think sending their kid to a SLAC is a good way to avoid questions about why their kid didn’t get into a top university. That’s hardly a highly intellectual decision.
Anonymous wrote:Williams: The quintessential New England college. The most beautiful location. The campus oozes class. Preppy, relatively conservative students, many hoping to make a fortune in finance. Williams has been the US News champ for 20 years! What else needs to be said? Tied with Amherst for the most prestige.
Amherst: The college for progressive kids. Forward-thinking emphasis on student diversity and open curriculum. Highly intelligent students, many championing DEI causes. Great college town location. Good consortium with four other schools. Right on Williams's heels in US News. Tied for the most prestige.
Swarthmore: The college for intellectual kids. Difficult classes with heavy work loads. Students very liberal but too busy with coursework to do much politically. The best STEM in WASP. They have engineering! Maybe the hardest-working students, but prestige somewhat less than Williams or Amherst. Are the students considered too nerdy?
Pomona: The California lifestyle college. Students most similar to those at Swarthmore, but a bit less intense. Very casual environment, shorts worn year-round. Great consortium with Claremont. The hardest of WASP to get into because everyone wants that weather! But also the least prestige. How can we take them seriously with all that SoCal sunshine?
Those are my thoughts on these great schools. Please add your thoughts!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's my take on WASP:
Williams: Terrible, no good school that rejected my kid. May locusts devour their crops and their spouses become infertile.
Amherst: Kid didn't apply and so I don't know much about it except that it's definitely better than Williams.
Swarthmore: It's am amazing college that accepted my kid. All Swatties are good looking geniuses and who will probably win Nobel Prizes in the future.
Pomona: It's a mediocre school that waitlisted my kid. It has the potential to be great (waitlist pending), but it has some serious issues (like taking my kid off the waitlist).
That’s the spirit!
All williams grads are deeply insecure about not having gotten into an ivy, so they throw that sense of inferiority into a ridic superiority complex wherre thry go around telling everyone they go to thr #1 ranked slac. For ppl to go, huh? So how do you like going to school so close to colonial williamsburg?
Anonymous wrote:People who know SLAC’s in general tend to be among the highly intellectual crowd, not your garden variety DMV dummy. Grad schools and employers also know these colleges to have excellent reputations. IYKYK.