Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I live in Bloomingdale and it's stunning how over 5 years or so, the "I must list 12 schools because I'm desperate to avoid my IB" vibe has disappeared. Now it's.more like you list a few others but the IB option is fine, or even pretty appealing. The fall of Mundo and TR has been eye-opening for sure.
I'm in the neighborhood and agree. I have a 10 year old and remember the absolute frenzy 8 years ago to figure out how to get all the kids our of the IB school, including meetings with the "educational consultant" who really did kind of tell everyone to go for charters. Everyone who went to Mundo or TR has since left those school, but actually many of the people who chose Langely or Seaton at the time are still at their neighborhood schools. Of course both those schools are packed with IB gentrifiers now.
Anonymous wrote:But yeah, nobody here seems to remember how long ago it was that Deal was a shithole nobody would touch.
Anonymous wrote:i have a rising pk3, and i certainly spent a lot of time lurking and reading past threads on lottery lists and schools, and re-arranged my list a few times after open houses, but didn't feel the need to have strangers second and third-guess for me.
the current reality is that my IB is totally fine, there's one achievable school that I would prefer, and one reach that I think would be good for my little one but I don't expect to get in. She's thriving in her current daycare so if we don't get a seat anywhere before k that is also fine if more expensive.
The looming issue is of course middle school, as I will not send my little to Cardozo, and a Shaw middle at 8th and Euclid is also a pass for me. (I used to live off of Euclid.) So we may end up having to do private once middle school hits if we don't get into a school with a good feeder, but I can only stress about so many things at once. Also I can't really predict at this point whether my little is going to be nerdy or sporty or arty or whatever, so I'm not going to get my heart set on a school years in advance that might be completely inappropriate for them. I want them to thrive, not be a mini-me. Maybe I'll post my any internal meltdown once the lottery results come out?
Anonymous wrote:"Love how people are like "I have a 3 year old. This high school is OUT for me."
I get tired of this place."
Nine years ago, the median math PARCC score at my zoned high school was a 2 and the median ELA score was a 1.
Last year, the median math PARCC score at my zoned high school was a 2 and the median ELA score was a 1.
Anonymous wrote:Love how people are like "I have a 3 year old. This high school is OUT for me."
I get tired of this place.
Anonymous wrote:i have a rising pk3, and i certainly spent a lot of time lurking and reading past threads on lottery lists and schools, and re-arranged my list a few times after open houses, but didn't feel the need to have strangers second and third-guess for me.
the current reality is that my IB is totally fine, there's one achievable school that I would prefer, and one reach that I think would be good for my little one but I don't expect to get in. She's thriving in her current daycare so if we don't get a seat anywhere before k that is also fine if more expensive.
The looming issue is of course middle school, as I will not send my little to Cardozo, and a Shaw middle at 8th and Euclid is also a pass for me. (I used to live off of Euclid.) So we may end up having to do private once middle school hits if we don't get into a school with a good feeder, but I can only stress about so many things at once. Also I can't really predict at this point whether my little is going to be nerdy or sporty or arty or whatever, so I'm not going to get my heart set on a school years in advance that might be completely inappropriate for them. I want them to thrive, not be a mini-me. Maybe I'll post my any internal meltdown once the lottery results come out?
Anonymous wrote:Love how people are like "I have a 3 year old. This high school is OUT for me."
I get tired of this place.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think there has been a drop in birth rates.
Kids applying for PK3 this year will turn 3 10/1/23-9/30/24, so were born 10/1/20-9/30/21. I think there was a dip in births around this time.
Nope - this should be a bump year. I think some families may be surprised if they are going off recent year waitlist numbers.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/covid-caused-a-baby-bump-when-experts-expected-a-drop-heres-why/
DC specific birth data https://dme.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/dme/publication/attachments/DME_EdSight%20Birth%20Trends%20%28FINAL%29.pdf
Here with 2021. The Ward specific data is interesting. Ward 6 plummets in 2021.
https://edscape.dc.gov/page/pop-and-students-number-births-and-birth-rates#:~:text=Number%20of%20Births%20by%20Ward%2C%202010%2D2021&text=The%20rate%20increased%20to%2015.22,12.95%20births%20per%201%2C000%20population.
But Ward 2 seems to rise by the same amount. Were the Ward boundaries redrawn then?
They were.
-someone who lives in center city and underestimated how being situated here kneecaps the neighborhood's political power
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My guess is that there are fewer young families moving into DC. They are in the suburbs/exurbs.
+1. Young families are priced out of those areas where lottery strategizing was needed.
I have a current prek3 kid on the Hill. From what I recall looking back at the waitlist numbers last year, it seemed like the overall numbers were lower than prior years. I've wondered if maybe the demographics on the Hill are shifting to be slightly older kids.