Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are many, many threads in this forum detailing how school districts are very reluctant to suspend students or even enact serious consequences. APS is not immune to this trend.
Perhaps we could return to the topic of this thread…
there is also the trend of overdiscipline of black and brown students and sped kids, and the data shows APS is doing this too. stop your denial of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why won’t the county take action to fix the hot mess?
There is often a cohort of students that consistently demonstrate behavioral issues and cause classroom disruptions. The schools (including Oakridge) will often not discipline or remove these students, instead choosing a "restorative justice" type of approach, which does nothing. The teachers and other students continue to have to deal with the disruptive kids. APS dealt with lawsuits in the past where it was shown that some demographic groups were disciplined more often than others. As a result, APS decided to stop disciplining. Voila -- the problem of inequitable discipline has disappeared.
Please wake up. APS did not stop disciplining and the problem of inequitable discipline certainly has not disappeared.
https://www.arlnow.com/2025/11/17/aps-suspensions-drop-but-big-demographic-disparities-persist/
Is it inequitable or unequal distribution of offenses?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You seem nice. Did you miss the comment that APS has stopped disciplining?
Again, where in MY comment did I reference all of APS?
I’d try to explain it further, but I forgot my crayons.
I don't know if it was you or another poster because as you may have noticed, the comments are all anonymous. Yes, it was literally said that APS has stopped disciplining. You can scroll back yourself and find it if you are interested in anything other than trolling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why won’t the county take action to fix the hot mess?
There is often a cohort of students that consistently demonstrate behavioral issues and cause classroom disruptions. The schools (including Oakridge) will often not discipline or remove these students, instead choosing a "restorative justice" type of approach, which does nothing. The teachers and other students continue to have to deal with the disruptive kids. APS dealt with lawsuits in the past where it was shown that some demographic groups were disciplined more often than others. As a result, APS decided to stop disciplining. Voila -- the problem of inequitable discipline has disappeared.
Please wake up. APS did not stop disciplining and the problem of inequitable discipline certainly has not disappeared.
https://www.arlnow.com/2025/11/17/aps-suspensions-drop-but-big-demographic-disparities-persist/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why won’t the county take action to fix the hot mess?
There is often a cohort of students that consistently demonstrate behavioral issues and cause classroom disruptions. The schools (including Oakridge) will often not discipline or remove these students, instead choosing a "restorative justice" type of approach, which does nothing. The teachers and other students continue to have to deal with the disruptive kids. APS dealt with lawsuits in the past where it was shown that some demographic groups were disciplined more often than others. As a result, APS decided to stop disciplining. Voila -- the problem of inequitable discipline has disappeared.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You seem nice. Did you miss the comment that APS has stopped disciplining?
Again, where in MY comment did I reference all of APS?
I’d try to explain it further, but I forgot my crayons.
Anonymous wrote:You seem nice. Did you miss the comment that APS has stopped disciplining?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why won’t the county take action to fix the hot mess?
There is often a cohort of students that consistently demonstrate behavioral issues and cause classroom disruptions. The schools (including Oakridge) will often not discipline or remove these students, instead choosing a "restorative justice" type of approach, which does nothing. The teachers and other students continue to have to deal with the disruptive kids. APS dealt with lawsuits in the past where it was shown that some demographic groups were disciplined more often than others. As a result, APS decided to stop disciplining. Voila -- the problem of inequitable discipline has disappeared.
APS has NOT stopped disciplining.
It’s very minimal
It's not.
I witnessed Dr. Wright’s “discipline” during their Spring Fling. Very minimal, indeed (for certain demographics anyway).
That’s one principal at one event. Hardly representative of all APS.
She’s the principal at Oakridge, which is… what this entire thread is about. Go to bed, sweetie.
Please read a little more carefully. Did you miss the claim that APS stopped disciplining and the conversation that followed?
Anonymous wrote:There are many, many threads in this forum detailing how school districts are very reluctant to suspend students or even enact serious consequences. APS is not immune to this trend.
Perhaps we could return to the topic of this thread…
Anonymous wrote:So, as a parent if she’s on notice and there have been complaints what can we do? Start a petition? I’m tired of just sitting back and hoping something happens when it’s clear they are just covering things up and not going to make a change.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why won’t the county take action to fix the hot mess?
There is often a cohort of students that consistently demonstrate behavioral issues and cause classroom disruptions. The schools (including Oakridge) will often not discipline or remove these students, instead choosing a "restorative justice" type of approach, which does nothing. The teachers and other students continue to have to deal with the disruptive kids. APS dealt with lawsuits in the past where it was shown that some demographic groups were disciplined more often than others. As a result, APS decided to stop disciplining. Voila -- the problem of inequitable discipline has disappeared.
APS has NOT stopped disciplining.
It’s very minimal
It's not.
I witnessed Dr. Wright’s “discipline” during their Spring Fling. Very minimal, indeed (for certain demographics anyway).
Does this mean she was only firm with the white, UMC kids? Or the opposite?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why won’t the county take action to fix the hot mess?
There is often a cohort of students that consistently demonstrate behavioral issues and cause classroom disruptions. The schools (including Oakridge) will often not discipline or remove these students, instead choosing a "restorative justice" type of approach, which does nothing. The teachers and other students continue to have to deal with the disruptive kids. APS dealt with lawsuits in the past where it was shown that some demographic groups were disciplined more often than others. As a result, APS decided to stop disciplining. Voila -- the problem of inequitable discipline has disappeared.
APS has NOT stopped disciplining.
It’s very minimal
It's not.
I witnessed Dr. Wright’s “discipline” during their Spring Fling. Very minimal, indeed (for certain demographics anyway).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why won’t the county take action to fix the hot mess?
There is often a cohort of students that consistently demonstrate behavioral issues and cause classroom disruptions. The schools (including Oakridge) will often not discipline or remove these students, instead choosing a "restorative justice" type of approach, which does nothing. The teachers and other students continue to have to deal with the disruptive kids. APS dealt with lawsuits in the past where it was shown that some demographic groups were disciplined more often than others. As a result, APS decided to stop disciplining. Voila -- the problem of inequitable discipline has disappeared.
APS has NOT stopped disciplining.
It’s very minimal
It's not.
I witnessed Dr. Wright’s “discipline” during their Spring Fling. Very minimal, indeed (for certain demographics anyway).
That’s one principal at one event. Hardly representative of all APS.
She’s the principal at Oakridge, which is… what this entire thread is about. Go to bed, sweetie.