Anonymous wrote:Does NAACP think MCEA did not support victims of Beidleman?

https://parentscoalitionmc.blogspot.com/2024/02/naacp-to-mcea-mcea-advocates-for-budget.html?m=1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MCEA absolutely doesn't care about the victims. The didn't want to fire McKnight over the Beidleman scandal-- they're still mad at McKnight for reopening schools.

Time to take off the tinfoil. Yikes. Got any facts to back up all that?

MCEA has been out to get McKnight since reopening. That's what the initial vote of no confidence was about. But reopening was too popular, so they needed to wait to pin a scandal on her to get their revenge. And NAACP saw right through it.

Really? I’m a teacher and don’t agree with any of that. Most of my colleagues felt she was up to the job. Please don’t speak for all of us.

You don't remember MCEA's vote of no confidence in January 2022?

Hmmm. But it wasn’t about reopening. Clearly, they were right and tired of being abused and not being heard. You do remember the Washington Post article in Fall of 2023, right?

It also was about her being Jack Smith's right hand. He was awful towards MCEA and refused to listen to teachers. It was partly guilt by association and teachers wanted someone from outside the cesspool Fat Jack created. Looks like MCEA was right.

And when was MCEA's vote of no confidence for Smith?

Gee, I wonder what is different about McKnight versus Smith that might cause someone to treat her differently...

That she hired her cronies into all the chief positions and that they as a team were terrible at running the school system during the height of covid.

I don’t remember Jack Smith creating a half dozen new leadership positions paying +$200k per year and then filling them with his toxic and incompetent buddies

I don't remember McKNight doing it either but I guess it's a nice story to justify your racism.

Thank goodness the world doesn’t rely on your memory. She created 5 new roles that reported directly to her that were above the associate superintendent. MCEA and teachers all saw this as gaming the system. Like how celebrities only surround themselves with people that agree with them and give infinite praise. She was tone deaf to what was really happening in the schools and only supported those that spewed the same toxic positivity she did. Her whole push for data was just to manipulate it instead of take any kind of accountability or appear transparent.

+100
Many more qualified leaders were passed over to allow for her friends’ appointments to those elevated Chief roles.

Let's hope Jack Smith stays busy with the MD State Superintendent search and doesn't come near the MCPS Superintendent search. He definitely got it wrong the first time around.

Anonymous wrote:As a teacher on day one I first felt proud of being part of a union. They talk a big game. It doesn't take long to realize that they don't protect teachers or preserve the integrity of the profession. Quite the opposite. They influence and play along with policy makers that make teachers lives unstable. I thought the union would acknowledge the violence in schools and disrespecting of rules, but no, teachers are just there to be a blame. This is why we teachers don't recommend this profession to people that demand dignity and safety. American schools will chew teachers up and spit them out if data manipulation and false reporting are not adhered to.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a *very* unusual posture for a local NAACP branch to take vis a vis a teachers' union.

Unusual? Yes. Surprising? No. MCEA is the most corrupt political organization in the county.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MCEA absolutely doesn't care about the victims. The didn't want to fire McKnight over the Beidleman scandal-- they're still mad at McKnight for reopening schools.

Time to take off the tinfoil. Yikes. Got any facts to back up all that?

MCEA has been out to get McKnight since reopening. That's what the initial vote of no confidence was about. But reopening was too popular, so they needed to wait to pin a scandal on her to get their revenge. And NAACP saw right through it.

Really? I’m a teacher and don’t agree with any of that. Most of my colleagues felt she was up to the job. Please don’t speak for all of us.

You don't remember MCEA's vote of no confidence in January 2022?

Hmmm. But it wasn’t about reopening. Clearly, they were right and tired of being abused and not being heard. You do remember the Washington Post article in Fall of 2023, right?

It also was about her being Jack Smith's right hand. He was awful towards MCEA and refused to listen to teachers. It was partly guilt by association and teachers wanted someone from outside the cesspool Fat Jack created. Looks like MCEA was right.

And when was MCEA's vote of no confidence for Smith?

Gee, I wonder what is different about McKnight versus Smith that might cause someone to treat her differently...

That she hired her cronies into all the chief positions and that they as a team were terrible at running the school system during the height of covid.

I don’t remember Jack Smith creating a half dozen new leadership positions paying +$200k per year and then filling them with his toxic and incompetent buddies

I don't remember McKNight doing it either but I guess it's a nice story to justify your racism.

Thank goodness the world doesn’t rely on your memory. She created 5 new roles that reported directly to her that were above the associate superintendent. MCEA and teachers all saw this as gaming the system. Like how celebrities only surround themselves with people that agree with them and give infinite praise. She was tone deaf to what was really happening in the schools and only supported those that spewed the same toxic positivity she did. Her whole push for data was just to manipulate it instead of take any kind of accountability or appear transparent.

+100
Many more qualified leaders were passed over to allow for her friends’ appointments to those elevated Chief roles.

Let's hope Jack Smith stays busy with the MD State Superintendent search and doesn't come near the MCPS Superintendent search. He definitely got it wrong the first time around.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MCEA absolutely doesn't care about the victims. The didn't want to fire McKnight over the Beidleman scandal-- they're still mad at McKnight for reopening schools.

Time to take off the tinfoil. Yikes. Got any facts to back up all that?

MCEA has been out to get McKnight since reopening. That's what the initial vote of no confidence was about. But reopening was too popular, so they needed to wait to pin a scandal on her to get their revenge. And NAACP saw right through it.

Really? I’m a teacher and don’t agree with any of that. Most of my colleagues felt she was up to the job. Please don’t speak for all of us.

You don't remember MCEA's vote of no confidence in January 2022?

Hmmm. But it wasn’t about reopening. Clearly, they were right and tired of being abused and not being heard. You do remember the Washington Post article in Fall of 2023, right?

It also was about her being Jack Smith's right hand. He was awful towards MCEA and refused to listen to teachers. It was partly guilt by association and teachers wanted someone from outside the cesspool Fat Jack created. Looks like MCEA was right.

And when was MCEA's vote of no confidence for Smith?

Gee, I wonder what is different about McKnight versus Smith that might cause someone to treat her differently...

That she hired her cronies into all the chief positions and that they as a team were terrible at running the school system during the height of covid.

I don’t remember Jack Smith creating a half dozen new leadership positions paying +$200k per year and then filling them with his toxic and incompetent buddies

I don't remember McKNight doing it either but I guess it's a nice story to justify your racism.

Thank goodness the world doesn’t rely on your memory. She created 5 new roles that reported directly to her that were above the associate superintendent. MCEA and teachers all saw this as gaming the system. Like how celebrities only surround themselves with people that agree with them and give infinite praise. She was tone deaf to what was really happening in the schools and only supported those that spewed the same toxic positivity she did. Her whole push for data was just to manipulate it instead of take any kind of accountability or appear transparent.

+100
Many more qualified leaders were passed over to allow for her friends’ appointments to those elevated Chief roles.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MCEA absolutely doesn't care about the victims. The didn't want to fire McKnight over the Beidleman scandal-- they're still mad at McKnight for reopening schools.

Time to take off the tinfoil. Yikes. Got any facts to back up all that?

MCEA has been out to get McKnight since reopening. That's what the initial vote of no confidence was about. But reopening was too popular, so they needed to wait to pin a scandal on her to get their revenge. And NAACP saw right through it.

Really? I’m a teacher and don’t agree with any of that. Most of my colleagues felt she was up to the job. Please don’t speak for all of us.

You don't remember MCEA's vote of no confidence in January 2022?

Hmmm. But it wasn’t about reopening. Clearly, they were right and tired of being abused and not being heard. You do remember the Washington Post article in Fall of 2023, right?

It also was about her being Jack Smith's right hand. He was awful towards MCEA and refused to listen to teachers. It was partly guilt by association and teachers wanted someone from outside the cesspool Fat Jack created. Looks like MCEA was right.

And when was MCEA's vote of no confidence for Smith?

Gee, I wonder what is different about McKnight versus Smith that might cause someone to treat her differently...

That she hired her cronies into all the chief positions and that they as a team were terrible at running the school system during the height of covid.

I don’t remember Jack Smith creating a half dozen new leadership positions paying +$200k per year and then filling them with his toxic and incompetent buddies

I don't remember McKNight doing it either but I guess it's a nice story to justify your racism.

Thank goodness the world doesn’t rely on your memory. She created 5 new roles that reported directly to her that were above the associate superintendent. MCEA and teachers all saw this as gaming the system. Like how celebrities only surround themselves with people that agree with them and give infinite praise. She was tone deaf to what was really happening in the schools and only supported those that spewed the same toxic positivity she did. Her whole push for data was just to manipulate it instead of take any kind of accountability or appear transparent.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MCEA absolutely doesn't care about the victims. The didn't want to fire McKnight over the Beidleman scandal-- they're still mad at McKnight for reopening schools.

Time to take off the tinfoil. Yikes. Got any facts to back up all that?

MCEA has been out to get McKnight since reopening. That's what the initial vote of no confidence was about. But reopening was too popular, so they needed to wait to pin a scandal on her to get their revenge. And NAACP saw right through it.

Really? I’m a teacher and don’t agree with any of that. Most of my colleagues felt she was up to the job. Please don’t speak for all of us.

You don't remember MCEA's vote of no confidence in January 2022?

Hmmm. But it wasn’t about reopening. Clearly, they were right and tired of being abused and not being heard. You do remember the Washington Post article in Fall of 2023, right?

It also was about her being Jack Smith's right hand. He was awful towards MCEA and refused to listen to teachers. It was partly guilt by association and teachers wanted someone from outside the cesspool Fat Jack created. Looks like MCEA was right.

And when was MCEA's vote of no confidence for Smith?

Gee, I wonder what is different about McKnight versus Smith that might cause someone to treat her differently...

That she hired her cronies into all the chief positions and that they as a team were terrible at running the school system during the height of covid.

She did a great job. The only people who say otherwise were the antivaxers.

The only people who say she did a great job and people who never directly worked for her. She put on a great show when getting chauffeured to schools with her entourage and having her photographer take pics to blow up poster size and hang all around CESC.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MCEA absolutely doesn't care about the victims. The didn't want to fire McKnight over the Beidleman scandal-- they're still mad at McKnight for reopening schools.

Time to take off the tinfoil. Yikes. Got any facts to back up all that?

MCEA has been out to get McKnight since reopening. That's what the initial vote of no confidence was about. But reopening was too popular, so they needed to wait to pin a scandal on her to get their revenge. And NAACP saw right through it.

Really? I’m a teacher and don’t agree with any of that. Most of my colleagues felt she was up to the job. Please don’t speak for all of us.

You don't remember MCEA's vote of no confidence in January 2022?

Hmmm. But it wasn’t about reopening. Clearly, they were right and tired of being abused and not being heard. You do remember the Washington Post article in Fall of 2023, right?

It also was about her being Jack Smith's right hand. He was awful towards MCEA and refused to listen to teachers. It was partly guilt by association and teachers wanted someone from outside the cesspool Fat Jack created. Looks like MCEA was right.

And when was MCEA's vote of no confidence for Smith?

Gee, I wonder what is different about McKnight versus Smith that might cause someone to treat her differently...

That she hired her cronies into all the chief positions and that they as a team were terrible at running the school system during the height of covid.

She did a great job. The only people who say otherwise were the antivaxers.

Anonymous wrote:This is a *very* unusual posture for a local NAACP branch to take vis a vis a teachers' union.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MCEA absolutely doesn't care about the victims. The didn't want to fire McKnight over the Beidleman scandal-- they're still mad at McKnight for reopening schools.

Time to take off the tinfoil. Yikes. Got any facts to back up all that?

MCEA has been out to get McKnight since reopening. That's what the initial vote of no confidence was about. But reopening was too popular, so they needed to wait to pin a scandal on her to get their revenge. And NAACP saw right through it.

Really? I’m a teacher and don’t agree with any of that. Most of my colleagues felt she was up to the job. Please don’t speak for all of us.

You don't remember MCEA's vote of no confidence in January 2022?

Hmmm. But it wasn’t about reopening. Clearly, they were right and tired of being abused and not being heard. You do remember the Washington Post article in Fall of 2023, right?

It also was about her being Jack Smith's right hand. He was awful towards MCEA and refused to listen to teachers. It was partly guilt by association and teachers wanted someone from outside the cesspool Fat Jack created. Looks like MCEA was right.

And when was MCEA's vote of no confidence for Smith?

Gee, I wonder what is different about McKnight versus Smith that might cause someone to treat her differently...

That she hired her cronies into all the chief positions and that they as a team were terrible at running the school system during the height of covid.

I don’t remember Jack Smith creating a half dozen new leadership positions paying +$200k per year and then filling them with his toxic and incompetent buddies

I don't remember McKNight doing it either but I guess it's a nice story to justify your racism.

Thank goodness the world doesn’t rely on your memory. She created 5 new roles that reported directly to her that were above the associate superintendent. MCEA and teachers all saw this as gaming the system. Like how celebrities only surround themselves with people that agree with them and give infinite praise. She was tone deaf to what was really happening in the schools and only supported those that spewed the same toxic positivity she did. Her whole push for data was just to manipulate it instead of take any kind of accountability or appear transparent.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MCEA absolutely doesn't care about the victims. The didn't want to fire McKnight over the Beidleman scandal-- they're still mad at McKnight for reopening schools.

Time to take off the tinfoil. Yikes. Got any facts to back up all that?

MCEA has been out to get McKnight since reopening. That's what the initial vote of no confidence was about. But reopening was too popular, so they needed to wait to pin a scandal on her to get their revenge. And NAACP saw right through it.

Really? I’m a teacher and don’t agree with any of that. Most of my colleagues felt she was up to the job. Please don’t speak for all of us.

You don't remember MCEA's vote of no confidence in January 2022?

Hmmm. But it wasn’t about reopening. Clearly, they were right and tired of being abused and not being heard. You do remember the Washington Post article in Fall of 2023, right?

It also was about her being Jack Smith's right hand. He was awful towards MCEA and refused to listen to teachers. It was partly guilt by association and teachers wanted someone from outside the cesspool Fat Jack created. Looks like MCEA was right.

And when was MCEA's vote of no confidence for Smith?

Gee, I wonder what is different about McKnight versus Smith that might cause someone to treat her differently...

That she hired her cronies into all the chief positions and that they as a team were terrible at running the school system during the height of covid.

I don’t remember Jack Smith creating a half dozen new leadership positions paying +$200k per year and then filling them with his toxic and incompetent buddies

I don't remember McKNight doing it either but I guess it's a nice story to justify your racism.

Thank goodness the world doesn’t rely on your memory. She created 5 new roles that reported directly to her that were above the associate superintendent. MCEA and teachers all saw this as gaming the system. Like how celebrities only surround themselves with people that agree with them and give infinite praise. She was tone deaf to what was really happening in the schools and only supported those that spewed the same toxic positivity she did. Her whole push for data was just to manipulate it instead of take any kind of accountability or appear transparent.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MCEA absolutely doesn't care about the victims. The didn't want to fire McKnight over the Beidleman scandal-- they're still mad at McKnight for reopening schools.

Time to take off the tinfoil. Yikes. Got any facts to back up all that?

MCEA has been out to get McKnight since reopening. That's what the initial vote of no confidence was about. But reopening was too popular, so they needed to wait to pin a scandal on her to get their revenge. And NAACP saw right through it.

Really? I’m a teacher and don’t agree with any of that. Most of my colleagues felt she was up to the job. Please don’t speak for all of us.

You don't remember MCEA's vote of no confidence in January 2022?

Hmmm. But it wasn’t about reopening. Clearly, they were right and tired of being abused and not being heard. You do remember the Washington Post article in Fall of 2023, right?

It also was about her being Jack Smith's right hand. He was awful towards MCEA and refused to listen to teachers. It was partly guilt by association and teachers wanted someone from outside the cesspool Fat Jack created. Looks like MCEA was right.

And when was MCEA's vote of no confidence for Smith?

Gee, I wonder what is different about McKnight versus Smith that might cause someone to treat her differently...

That she hired her cronies into all the chief positions and that they as a team were terrible at running the school system during the height of covid.

I don’t remember Jack Smith creating a half dozen new leadership positions paying +$200k per year and then filling them with his toxic and incompetent buddies

I don't remember McKNight doing it either but I guess it's a nice story to justify your racism.