Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who puts a teen in a car alone with a stranger?
A lot of people in this area do. And, as the mom of a teen boy, I might even be inclined to do so (versus my teen DD). Definitely something to consider, so I appreciate OP posting.
Anonymous wrote:Who puts a teen in a car alone with a stranger?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teen in a car alone with an unknown individual? That sounds like good parenting.
Parents don’t have time for their kids apparently.
Well, no, they fscking don't, because they have to work to afford the skyrocketing costs of keeping themselves and their offspring alive, assclown. It's not unreasonable for a parent to use a transportation service to transport their kid.
It's unreasonable for the person being paid to provide that service to assault someone.
Clear now? Idiot.
Sorry honey, both my parents worked and I never, ever got a ride with a stranger.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guys it is not the fault of anyone EXCEPT the perpetrator. Why we are we blaming parents.
No one is blaming but they made a poor choice and that should be brought to attention as well.
Anonymous wrote:Who puts a teen in a car alone with a stranger?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A 16 yo isn’t any more vulnerable than an 18 yo.
No one is safe getting in a car with a stranger but there is a difference between 18 and 16. I mean, 16 years old are allowed in the military are they?
So what about all the adults who also end up being assaulted by drivers? Are you saying it’s ok or somehow better bc they are over 18 ???
You are one of those posters who just thought you were going to start some kind of mob reaction agreeing with you. It didn’t happen. Let it go ….
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A 16 yo isn’t any more vulnerable than an 18 yo.
No one is safe getting in a car with a stranger but there is a difference between 18 and 16. I mean, 16 years old are allowed in the military are they?
So what about all the adults who also end up being assaulted by drivers? Are you saying it’s ok or somehow better bc they are over 18 ???
You are one of those posters who just thought you were going to start some kind of mob reaction agreeing with you. It didn’t happen. Let it go ….
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A 16 yo isn’t any more vulnerable than an 18 yo.
No one is safe getting in a car with a stranger but there is a difference between 18 and 16. I mean, 16 years old are allowed in the military are they?
So what about all the adults who also end up being assaulted by drivers? Are you saying it’s ok or somehow better bc they are over 18 ???
You are one of those posters who just thought you were going to start some kind of mob reaction agreeing with you. It didn’t happen. Let it go ….
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A 16 yo isn’t any more vulnerable than an 18 yo.
No one is safe getting in a car with a stranger but there is a difference between 18 and 16. I mean, 16 years old are allowed in the military are they?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who puts a teen in a car alone with a stranger?
Me! My teen used to walk/metro/bus everywhere, but it is way too dangerous out there now. Uber is the safest choice for our car less city family. I wouldn’t have thought so either, but I certainly didn’t anticipate how horribly this city would be run to the ground.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teen in a car alone with an unknown individual? That sounds like good parenting.
Parents don’t have time for their kids apparently.
Well, no, they fscking don't, because they have to work to afford the skyrocketing costs of keeping themselves and their offspring alive, assclown. It's not unreasonable for a parent to use a transportation service to transport their kid.
It's unreasonable for the person being paid to provide that service to assault someone.
Clear now? Idiot.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know. If I had a boy I might have been more likely allow it- just based in statistics. Not after hearing this though.
I read somewhere that Lyft was going to roll out a program where women and teens could request female drivers. This makes sense and reduces the risk substantially.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teen in a car alone with an unknown individual? That sounds like good parenting.
Parents don’t have time for their kids apparently.
Well, no, they fscking don't, because they have to work to afford the skyrocketing costs of keeping themselves and their offspring alive, assclown. It's not unreasonable for a parent to use a transportation service to transport their kid.
It's unreasonable for the person being paid to provide that service to assault someone.
Clear now? Idiot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teen in a car alone with an unknown individual? That sounds like good parenting.
Parents don’t have time for their kids apparently.
Well, no, they fscking don't, because they have to work to afford the skyrocketing costs of keeping themselves and their offspring alive, assclown. It's not unreasonable for a parent to use a transportation service to transport their kid.
It's unreasonable for the person being paid to provide that service to assault someone.
Clear now? Idiot.
Find another way, no way in hell am I putting my teen in that situation.