Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Allen takes crime seriously. Blaming him for the falilures of the Mayor and MPD while kowtowing to GOP operatives in this effort is not the solution.
It's funny because this is the same thing Janeese says. Same old excuses. Either crime isn't that bad or if it is, then it's someone else's fault (the mayor! the police! the attorney general! mean old Republicans!) because the city council doesnt really have any power. Uh, huh, right. Buh bye.
Anonymous wrote:Allen takes crime seriously. Blaming him for the falilures of the Mayor and MPD while kowtowing to GOP operatives in this effort is not the solution.
Anonymous wrote:Allen takes crime seriously. Blaming him for the falilures of the Mayor and MPD while kowtowing to GOP operatives in this effort is not the solution.
Anonymous wrote:I’m kind of a weird about privacy. Is it possible to sign this recall petition without my name being visible? I feel like Allen won’t get recalled because there are so many self-flagellating crime apologists in Ward 6, but would love to sign it without my name being posted everywhere.
Anonymous wrote:I’m kind of a weird about privacy. Is it possible to sign this recall petition without my name being visible? I feel like Allen won’t get recalled because there are so many self-flagellating crime apologists in Ward 6, but would love to sign it without my name being posted everywhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This recall is not just about Allen. It’s about repossessing a share of the voice and saying enough.
Is it a bit unfair because Wards 1, 4 and 8 deserve a recall more? Maybe. He has though really made a lot of enemies and detractors in his own party and I can’t see how he has any future politically. That’s why he’s desperate to hold on to this job.
Regardless of Allen, a reform of how we elect the Council and term limits are a must.
Ward 4 seat is up this election cycle and an electable challenger is running, no need to worry about that seat at the moment.
Anonymous wrote:I’m kind of a weird about privacy. Is it possible to sign this recall petition without my name being visible? I feel like Allen won’t get recalled because there are so many self-flagellating crime apologists in Ward 6, but would love to sign it without my name being posted everywhere.
Anonymous wrote:How does he feel knowing he’s the only recall in the history?
Anonymous wrote:This recall is not just about Allen. It’s about repossessing a share of the voice and saying enough.
Is it a bit unfair because Wards 1, 4 and 8 deserve a recall more? Maybe. He has though really made a lot of enemies and detractors in his own party and I can’t see how he has any future politically. That’s why he’s desperate to hold on to this job.
Regardless of Allen, a reform of how we elect the Council and term limits are a must.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:he decriminalized fare evasion on metro. This led to a general state of lawlessness on the metro with people of all stripes jumping the fare gates and metro losing a ton of money.
11-2 vote, Mendo and Jack Evans voted no.
he loudly supported and voted to decriminalize street vending. This has led to people ransacking stores and selling stolen goods on the street. My local stores now have a majority of their products behind glass. Now when I go into a CVS in the city, I have to wait around for someone to unlock the shampoo.
Passed unanimously
using budgetary control, he implemented a hiring freeze on new police officers. This resulted in police numbers dropping dramatically and led to a spike in crime. Then he bragged about it on Twitter: https://twitter.com/charlesallen/status/1277421585993994243
Passed unamimously. No member introduced an amendment to rollback the reallocations made in the public safety and justice budget.
It's like you think because there are other people making bad decisions, I shouldn't be upset that my own Councilmember is making bad decisions. I live in Ward 6. I only get one Councilmember, and he's not doing his most basic job of trying to keep his constituents safe. First his supporters said his voting record was "misrepresented" and now you're saying "oh but other people voted for those things as well." For me, the fact that there are other people who are ALSO not doing their job doesn't make a lick of difference.
Well, you asked for explanations and I did so. Now you are making a separate argument, to which I would argue yes, you have more than one CM. Voting 1 out will do nothing to change your safety, but it will cost the city more money than just waiting until the next election. You all don't even have a candidate so it just seems like a vendetta rather than anything that will actually help the city.
I disagree. It says to the limitless term people, you are accountable to us, your constituents
They run every four years. That's how you hold people accountable.
Not through primary based system. We can’t even vote out the Jews control cities Councilman.
So there isn't a strong enough Democratic candidate in a normal election cycle, so you are going to try and push one through this way through R backing? That's the plan?
Getting Allen out is my plan