Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As long as your wife is not complaining about Peter doing xyz with Kathy and you guys aren’t you are good. When she goes down the rabbit hole of comparing relationships and is depressed about it, look for the nearest exit.
But if they don't have real friends to compare you to, they start using the "most women" argument.
Who doesn’t have real friends to talk with when getting zero emotional support from one’s spouse?
You’d better believe yours getting talked about if you’re a delinquent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As long as your wife is not complaining about Peter doing xyz with Kathy and you guys aren’t you are good. When she goes down the rabbit hole of comparing relationships and is depressed about it, look for the nearest exit.
But if they don't have real friends to compare you to, they start using the "most women" argument.
Anonymous wrote:"Emotional needs" is such a poorly defined concept that the phrase is functionally useless.
It's indistinguishable from just "feeling unhappy" which, of course, can be caused by almost anything or even nothing at all. [/quote
]Anonymous wrote:"Emotional needs" is such a poorly defined concept that the phrase is functionally useless.
It's indistinguishable from just "feeling unhappy" which, of course, can be caused by almost anything or even nothing at all.
In my case, I am happy with most aspects of my life (friendships, children, career potential etc). My relationship with DH is complicated. I am happy with the parenting part of the relationship. He is great at fatherhood and our kids are amazing -- I couldn't have had better children if I married someone else. So I am happy he is the father of my children.
However, I am unhappy with my relationship with him. I have given my DH very specific instances where he has been an insensitive ahole by being dismissive of serious issues.
Example: Rather than saying "I changed my mind for such and such reason" when he did not want to go ahead with a plan we had, he said: "I was just joking" about his original position that we based future plans on ( and I made the decision based on his expressed needs at the time, not mine).
The issue is not the fact that he changed his mind. It's the dismissive attitude. That's the emotional deficiency. Every person I am close to gets how much I had invested physically, financially and emotionally in this plan and wrapped it into other important decisions. Why did DH not get it? It took a couple of discussions before I even got an apology for his " I was joking" comment. And I am supposed to have sex with this person? Not anytime soon!. I am the one with the higher sex drive and my hands have been working overtime.
We have discussed this in therapy. As usual, he says he gets it, but these things keep happening in different ways. I have asked him if I treat him like this, and the answer is always no. I don't understand why he is this way. But it's a similar problem in many households around me. My case is better because DH is really good in the areas he is good at ( fatherhood). I can't imagine dealing with this crap when your spouse sucks at parenting too.
But I cannot keep opening myself up to someone who is so casual about things that are clearly important and investments that I clearly made ( and in this example above, I took the position out of empathy for him -- it was he who wanted this originally).
And I try really hard to lean on others for emotional support instead of DH. I have great relationships with friends, sisters, aunts, etc. But in areas where he is involved, as in the example above where it is a family decision, I have no choice-- it's not a decision I could make without him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a recurrent complaint that married men are often not able to meet the emotional needs of their wives. Is it because men just don’t care? Or it because men don’t understand and/or know how to address those emotional needs?
Often, and I'll get hate for this, it's because how they are treated by their wives. A man isn't going to be loving and caring when his wife is attacking him for everything he does. This is in particular when she's a SAHM and he goes two work to support the family. Yes, SAHM is work also but when the attacks come he doesn't feel appreciated for what he brings to the table - which is a lot because it literally pays the bills.
Therefore, it's a snowball effect. Husband only works and checks out at home. Wife doesn't appreciate husband. Husband feels resentful. Both don't show affection. Both assume it's the other spouse's job to show affection.
You missed Step 1 of ruining your marriage. Here it is.
(Paycheck + Neglect) does not = Provider
Agreed the days of Paycheck dad only are over.
All that is is child support payments from an absent parent who actively avoids spending quality time with his family and kids.
And a wife who only focus on herself and her children while ignoring her husband isn't a good wife.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a recurrent complaint that married men are often not able to meet the emotional needs of their wives. Is it because men just don’t care? Or it because men don’t understand and/or know how to address those emotional needs?
Often, and I'll get hate for this, it's because how they are treated by their wives. A man isn't going to be loving and caring when his wife is attacking him for everything he does. This is in particular when she's a SAHM and he goes two work to support the family. Yes, SAHM is work also but when the attacks come he doesn't feel appreciated for what he brings to the table - which is a lot because it literally pays the bills.
Therefore, it's a snowball effect. Husband only works and checks out at home. Wife doesn't appreciate husband. Husband feels resentful. Both don't show affection. Both assume it's the other spouse's job to show affection.
You missed Step 1 of ruining your marriage. Here it is.
(Paycheck + Neglect) does not = Provider
Agreed the days of Paycheck dad only are over.
All that is is child support payments from an absent parent who actively avoids spending quality time with his family and kids.
And a wife who only focus on herself and her children while ignoring her husband isn't a good wife.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a recurrent complaint that married men are often not able to meet the emotional needs of their wives. Is it because men just don’t care? Or it because men don’t understand and/or know how to address those emotional needs?
Often, and I'll get hate for this, it's because how they are treated by their wives. A man isn't going to be loving and caring when his wife is attacking him for everything he does. This is in particular when she's a SAHM and he goes two work to support the family. Yes, SAHM is work also but when the attacks come he doesn't feel appreciated for what he brings to the table - which is a lot because it literally pays the bills.
Therefore, it's a snowball effect. Husband only works and checks out at home. Wife doesn't appreciate husband. Husband feels resentful. Both don't show affection. Both assume it's the other spouse's job to show affection.
You missed Step 1 of ruining your marriage. Here it is.
(Paycheck + Neglect) does not = Provider
Neglect is doing a lot of work. Not sure we are agree on what that means.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a recurrent complaint that married men are often not able to meet the emotional needs of their wives. Is it because men just don’t care? Or it because men don’t understand and/or know how to address those emotional needs?
Often, and I'll get hate for this, it's because how they are treated by their wives. A man isn't going to be loving and caring when his wife is attacking him for everything he does. This is in particular when she's a SAHM and he goes two work to support the family. Yes, SAHM is work also but when the attacks come he doesn't feel appreciated for what he brings to the table - which is a lot because it literally pays the bills.
Therefore, it's a snowball effect. Husband only works and checks out at home. Wife doesn't appreciate husband. Husband feels resentful. Both don't show affection. Both assume it's the other spouse's job to show affection.
You missed Step 1 of ruining your marriage. Here it is.
(Paycheck + Neglect) does not = Provider
Agreed the days of Paycheck dad only are over.
All that is is child support payments from an absent parent who actively avoids spending quality time with his family and kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a recurrent complaint that married men are often not able to meet the emotional needs of their wives. Is it because men just don’t care? Or it because men don’t understand and/or know how to address those emotional needs?
Often, and I'll get hate for this, it's because how they are treated by their wives. A man isn't going to be loving and caring when his wife is attacking him for everything he does. This is in particular when she's a SAHM and he goes two work to support the family. Yes, SAHM is work also but when the attacks come he doesn't feel appreciated for what he brings to the table - which is a lot because it literally pays the bills.
Therefore, it's a snowball effect. Husband only works and checks out at home. Wife doesn't appreciate husband. Husband feels resentful. Both don't show affection. Both assume it's the other spouse's job to show affection.
You missed Step 1 of ruining your marriage. Here it is.
(Paycheck + Neglect) does not = Provider
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As long as your wife is not complaining about Peter doing xyz with Kathy and you guys aren’t you are good. When she goes down the rabbit hole of comparing relationships and is depressed about it, look for the nearest exit.
But if they don't have real friends to compare you to, they start using the "most women" argument.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a recurrent complaint that married men are often not able to meet the emotional needs of their wives. Is it because men just don’t care? Or it because men don’t understand and/or know how to address those emotional needs?
Often, and I'll get hate for this, it's because how they are treated by their wives. A man isn't going to be loving and caring when his wife is attacking him for everything he does. This is in particular when she's a SAHM and he goes two work to support the family. Yes, SAHM is work also but when the attacks come he doesn't feel appreciated for what he brings to the table - which is a lot because it literally pays the bills.
Therefore, it's a snowball effect. Husband only works and checks out at home. Wife doesn't appreciate husband. Husband feels resentful. Both don't show affection. Both assume it's the other spouse's job to show affection.
You missed Step 1 of ruining your marriage. Here it is.
(Paycheck + Neglect) does not = Provider
Neglect is doing a lot of work. Not sure we are agree on what that means.
Anonymous wrote:Ha haha . I'm not in touch with my emotional needs!
Anonymous wrote:As long as your wife is not complaining about Peter doing xyz with Kathy and you guys aren’t you are good. When she goes down the rabbit hole of comparing relationships and is depressed about it, look for the nearest exit.