Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DSAT is much shorter now due to it being an adaptive test. Lots of other advantages. ACT will need to adjust to be competitive
Not just shorter, but I’m hearing there is more time to complete the answers. Levels the playing field for all those who can’t afford a neuropsych eval or aren’t willing to game the system to get extra time.
Anonymous wrote:But since the digital is new, can they still look at prior tests? Have the questions been used before or are they all brand new? It is frustrating not to understand how equalizing is going to happen, if at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid definitely saw equating in action on the practice tests where 5 wrong in one test was a higher score than 4 wrong on another.
That might not have to do with equating- that could be the result of harder questions getting more “weight” than easier questions on the digital version. It has to do with Item Response Theory, which is how they do these adaptive tests.
Anonymous wrote:My kid definitely saw equating in action on the practice tests where 5 wrong in one test was a higher score than 4 wrong on another.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t think they do equating for the digital ? That was the old paper scoring
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:my kid just took it today and said exactly this.Anonymous wrote:The math second module was way harder than any practice blue book test.
Same. Felt good on practice DSAT and said there were a couple of math problems in the second module that he had no clue how to do.
Mine too! Relieving to hear that is common experience. He’s not shooting for sky high score but nice to know maybe this doesn’t mean he didn’t do terribly
Same here. Math module 2 was extremely hard for many, many test takers who had done really, really well in test practice. This is all over the internets...
Test takers discussing are talking about curved results. I don't think they are technically curved but I do think scores are somehow adjusted for difficulty depending on test date, but the information I have found is not clear. Specifically, what I found on College Board was too short, general and vague, but prep companies do describe some score adjustment to make it equal across test dates ("while emphasizing it's NOT curved"). Anyone seen a comprehensive, transplant, and clear explanation from an original source, which I assume would be the College Board?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:my kid just took it today and said exactly this.Anonymous wrote:The math second module was way harder than any practice blue book test.
Same. Felt good on practice DSAT and said there were a couple of math problems in the second module that he had no clue how to do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:my kid just took it today and said exactly this.Anonymous wrote:The math second module was way harder than any practice blue book test.
Same. Felt good on practice DSAT and said there were a couple of math problems in the second module that he had no clue how to do.
Mine too! Relieving to hear that is common experience. He’s not shooting for sky high score but nice to know maybe this doesn’t mean he didn’t do terribly
Same here. Math module 2 was extremely hard for many, many test takers who had done really, really well in test practice. This is all over the internets...
Test takers discussing are talking about curved results. I don't think they are technically curved but I do think scores are somehow adjusted for difficulty depending on test date, but the information I have found is not clear. Specifically, what I found on College Board was too short, general and vague, but prep companies do describe some score adjustment to make it equal across test dates ("while emphasizing it's NOT curved"). Anyone seen a comprehensive, transplant, and clear explanation from an original source, which I assume would be the College Board?