Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That ROI chart is bumming me out.
I think it's very misleading--and I haven't been able to find any thorough explanation of how they made data decisions, which is a red flag (If someone has found it--link please!). For just one small instance, is their estimation of "cost of attendance" based on an assumption of full pay--which many colleges would not have?
That's actually a good thing for a lot of people here. Most other ROI type websites I've seen assume an average cost which does not apply to most of us here.
Well, not at some schools that offer loads of merit aid etc. And then are they using in-state or out of state? The red flag is the lack of transparency at how you come up with some dollar amount ROI which is a pretty complex problem.
It’s… totally explained if you just have the wit to look it up.
Anonymous wrote:DD did not get admitted into our state flagship (UMD). Her state backup is Towson.
DH and I are disagreeing about what is her better option long term and I am curious what DCUM has to say!
With that said, would you rather...
1) Attend the in-state school for the cost savings
2) Attend an out-of-state flagship for approximately 12,000 more annually (school is unknown- there are many choices including Indiana- Kelly direct admit, Wisconsin, Penn State- UP, Ohio State, South Carolina, Clemson)
The degree is business- though she is not sure what area.
Would a state flagship's ROI be substantial enough to offset the cost difference? The $12,000 annually is not a deal breaker for us, but will also be felt at home.
Also, our daughter is adamantly against Towson and feels it is embarrassing, so you can guess which direction she is going in!
What say you DCUM?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That ROI chart is bumming me out.
I think it's very misleading--and I haven't been able to find any thorough explanation of how they made data decisions, which is a red flag (If someone has found it--link please!). For just one small instance, is their estimation of "cost of attendance" based on an assumption of full pay--which many colleges would not have?
That's actually a good thing for a lot of people here. Most other ROI type websites I've seen assume an average cost which does not apply to most of us here.
Well, not at some schools that offer loads of merit aid etc. And then are they using in-state or out of state? The red flag is the lack of transparency at how you come up with some dollar amount ROI which is a pretty complex problem.