Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Public school will be easier to maintain a high GPA-and with Top 20 colleges currently obsessed with DEI, less and less private school kids are going to get their spots. One exception might be the SLACās-they still want and need the full pay private school kids. So, kind of depends what you are hoping for for college.
I think this is true, and it's what parents don't understand. Sending your kid to SFS yields zero advantage in college admissions nowadays. Schools don't like that the school oozes privilege and want more kids from disadvantaged backgrounds. Your kid will also likely struggle to stand out in a school filled with Ivy-obsessed overachievers with private tutors.
If your goal is simply college, then send them to the easiest and least-competitive high school. Being in the top 2% of Dunbar will yield much better results than the top 25% of SFS. Yes, SFS is much more rigorous, but college admissions cares only about DEI and sob stories now, and they consider rich prep school kids to be "oppressors" that they want to keep out.
š
Wishful thinking! Highly selective colleges, in this country, are businesses. They have always coveted privileged studentsā¦and they always will.
Donāt pay attention to what these colleges say, pay attention to what they do (and the wealth of their student body).
https://www.thedartmouth.com/article/2022/10/cradle-to-cap-and-gown-the-prep-school-to-ivy-pipeline
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/07/24/upshot/ivy-league-elite-college-admissions.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Public school will be easier to maintain a high GPA-and with Top 20 colleges currently obsessed with DEI, less and less private school kids are going to get their spots. One exception might be the SLACās-they still want and need the full pay private school kids. So, kind of depends what you are hoping for for college.
I think this is true, and it's what parents don't understand. Sending your kid to SFS yields zero advantage in college admissions nowadays. Schools don't like that the school oozes privilege and want more kids from disadvantaged backgrounds. Your kid will also likely struggle to stand out in a school filled with Ivy-obsessed overachievers with private tutors.
If your goal is simply college, then send them to the easiest and least-competitive high school. Being in the top 2% of Dunbar will yield much better results than the top 25% of SFS. Yes, SFS is much more rigorous, but college admissions cares only about DEI and sob stories now, and they consider rich prep school kids to be "oppressors" that they want to keep out.
Anonymous wrote:Public school will be easier to maintain a high GPA-and with Top 20 colleges currently obsessed with DEI, less and less private school kids are going to get their spots. One exception might be the SLACās-they still want and need the full pay private school kids. So, kind of depends what you are hoping for for college.
Anonymous wrote:Does a High School GPA include art classes?
Anonymous wrote:What GPA number range is an A-?
Anonymous wrote:For example, if a 3.3 is a B+ and a 3.7 is an A- what is a 3.66 or 3.68 for example
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow -- things have changed. When my kid graduated from SFS not that long ago, the average GPA was 3.2. I know it has come up in recent years. I still believe college admissions are not all about GPA there. If you are taking good classes, have an A- average, have a top ACT/SAT score (as most SFS kids do), and have some extras, you can compete for the top schools. Doesn't mean you'll get in, but you're competitive.
Grade inflation.