Anonymous wrote:I looked at this for the published matriculation data of graduating classes back in 2019 and then again in 2022.
TJ had about
- 8% HYPSM
- 6% next tier of privates (ranked 6-14)
- 20% public Top-4 (UVA, Mich, Cal, UCLA)
- 1% top SLACs/international
- 16% next tier of privates (15-25)
- 16% next tier of publics (6-15)
- 16% next tier of publics (16-25)
- 4% next tier of privates (26-55)
- 4% next tier of publics (26-50)
- 5% other VA publics or local schools
- 4% everything else
Compare to Mclean which was
- 1% HYPSM
- 2% next tier of privates (ranked 6-14)
- 11% public Top-4 (UVA, Mich, Cal, UCLA)
- 2% top SLACs/international
- 4% next tier of privates (15-25)
- 8% next tier of publics (6-15)
- 7% next tier of publics (16-25)
- 7% next tier of privates (26-55)
- 8% next tier of publics (26-50)
- 28% other VA publics or local schools
- 22% everything else
McLean has a larger percentage of graduating kids who were not listed and/or not attending college, so even though ~3% of those listed went to a top 14 private, that probably reflects closer to top ~2% of class... and also doesn't factor in hooks, which I suspect play a bigger role in aggregate for admitted McLean students than for admitted TJ students.
But hooks aside, if you drew the line at say top-15 publics and top 25 privates, at TJ you've got the top 2/3 of the class getting in, whereas at McLean it's the top 1/4. Definitely TJ isn't getting shunned historically. Hopefully they'll print matriculation again end-of-year for class of 2024 and we can see if the data has actually moved significantly in terms of where kids are matriculating to from our HS's... otherwise it's just anecdotes.
Anonymous wrote:Where can you see this data for other FCPS high schools? Awesome stats to know about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:TJ admissions has been changed to eliminate merit criteria and admit based on skin color. It shouldn't be surprising if students are receiving C grades and find it challenging to secure admission to top-tier schools.
![]()
Current seniors are the last class before the change in admissions so they are still the “old way”.
And the last class to suffer admission caps at the T10 now that TJ has a clear DEI message.
Starting next year, my expectation is that TJHSST acceptance to the top schools will fall significantly (but still be much better than McLean Hs and Langley HS) because relatively lower standardized test scores will offset any university DEI admission factors.
You are predicting next year's SAT average at TJ will be much lower than recent years? Easy enough to check. Come back next year and tell us.
Yeah I think someone posted that the PSAT average dropped by over 100 points for the first DEI class.
The drop is irrelevant. TJ will still have the same top students with high scores going to the T10 but now will also have students with excellent DEI factors, including an essay on getting through TJ despite being poor, not Asian/white, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Instead of implementing DEI-based quotas at TJHSST, they should have created another TJHSST elsewhere in Northern Virginia. Given the population growth in this area, there are more than enough gifted students, and there is more than enough demand among parents, for a second STEM-focused high school in the area.
With all the population growth around the metro lines, why has no one thought to put a Governor’s high school or another STEM-focused high school next to a metro station? Now would seem the time to do that, while land is still available adjacent to the silver line stations. That sure beats some casino or stadium.