Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I try to take an “everything in moderation” approach, but my teens will almost always opt for Goldfish and other processed food if we have it. I’ve thought of not buying it, but I hate sending the message that anything is “bad.”
Why wouldn’t you want to send the message that a bad thing is bad?
Not OP, but perhaps because it is widely regarded as harmful by experts in pediatric nutrition. A quick Google search about labeling food as “good” or “bad” to children will bring up pages of research. It is associated with shame, bingeing, and disordered eating.
NP, but I disagree. They are bad for you. End of discussion. 70% of adults adults are overweight. No matter what you do or don’t do, chances are high that will be your kids one day.
So at least teach them the facts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have never meant anyone that has zero processed snacks in the house. I just don’t think that is realistic with busy kids in after school activities and such.
I buy pretzels, granola bars (we make our own too sometimes), triscuits, seaweed packs most regularly. Plus some chocolate almonds and sweet things on hand.
Of my social group, this is by far, the healthiest processed snack options at home. Most go to Costco and buy a ton of crap in bulk.
lol. I look forward to when your teenage athletes are burning 3000-4000 calories per day and you're tossing them some seaweed and chocolate almonds![]()
![]()
![]()
you'll be pulling up to Costco like the rest of us
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I try to take an “everything in moderation” approach, but my teens will almost always opt for Goldfish and other processed food if we have it. I’ve thought of not buying it, but I hate sending the message that anything is “bad.”
Why wouldn’t you want to send the message that a bad thing is bad?
Not OP, but perhaps because it is widely regarded as harmful by experts in pediatric nutrition. A quick Google search about labeling food as “good” or “bad” to children will bring up pages of research. It is associated with shame, bingeing, and disordered eating.
Anonymous wrote:A couple years ago, this topic went viral and people started calling homes without snacks an “ingredients household.” I stick to a mix of ingredients and ready-to-go snacks mostly to save time & sanity, but also because a lot of kids who grow up in ingredients-only homes overindulge in all the things they were denied as kids once they move out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I try to take an “everything in moderation” approach, but my teens will almost always opt for Goldfish and other processed food if we have it. I’ve thought of not buying it, but I hate sending the message that anything is “bad.”
Why wouldn’t you want to send the message that a bad thing is bad?
Not OP, but perhaps because it is widely regarded as harmful by experts in pediatric nutrition. A quick Google search about labeling food as “good” or “bad” to children will bring up pages of research. It is associated with shame, bingeing, and disordered eating.
It's now recommendeded I believe to talk about nutrition value. Like a PP mentioned i.e. apple and peanut snack will keep you full longer because of the protein vs having goldfish crackers.
Whose recommendation are you looking at?
I did a fair amount of research into how best to feed kids, because I had a pretty medically complex kid who needed a lot of problem solving. At that time, the research clearly supported the model the PP you quote mentioned. Is there research supporting a different model now?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I try to take an “everything in moderation” approach, but my teens will almost always opt for Goldfish and other processed food if we have it. I’ve thought of not buying it, but I hate sending the message that anything is “bad.”
Why wouldn’t you want to send the message that a bad thing is bad?
Not OP, but perhaps because it is widely regarded as harmful by experts in pediatric nutrition. A quick Google search about labeling food as “good” or “bad” to children will bring up pages of research. It is associated with shame, bingeing, and disordered eating.
It's now recommendeded I believe to talk about nutrition value. Like a PP mentioned i.e. apple and peanut snack will keep you full longer because of the protein vs having goldfish crackers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I try to take an “everything in moderation” approach, but my teens will almost always opt for Goldfish and other processed food if we have it. I’ve thought of not buying it, but I hate sending the message that anything is “bad.”
Why wouldn’t you want to send the message that a bad thing is bad?
Not OP, but perhaps because it is widely regarded as harmful by experts in pediatric nutrition. A quick Google search about labeling food as “good” or “bad” to children will bring up pages of research. It is associated with shame, bingeing, and disordered eating.