Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pre-pandemic I would have said that is not normal. When I was in MCPS, we had labs in middle school science classes. I have no idea what the children normally do in middle school science these days with regard to labs.
Our middle school received beautiful lab tables, etc. when renovated. But they’re effectively just used as desks. They almost never do labs.
This is so sad. My kid is in 10th and has yet to have an actual lab. Like where are the goggles, test tubes, vials, Bunsen burners etc…
I think this is more Science Lab Nostalgia than actual current science labs.
No this is current science. Kids have to learn how to use lab equipment in order to do serious science in college.
+1 My DD did get actual labs in HS bio (IB bio) but her only chemistry experience was during the online covid year so she's never done a real chemistry lab. This year she's a college freshman and this semester is taking her first chemistry class. It is going to be very challenging!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No this is current science. Kids have to learn how to use lab equipment in order to do serious science in college.
+100
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pre-pandemic I would have said that is not normal. When I was in MCPS, we had labs in middle school science classes. I have no idea what the children normally do in middle school science these days with regard to labs.
Our middle school received beautiful lab tables, etc. when renovated. But they’re effectively just used as desks. They almost never do labs.
This is so sad. My kid is in 10th and has yet to have an actual lab. Like where are the goggles, test tubes, vials, Bunsen burners etc…
I think this is more Science Lab Nostalgia than actual current science labs.
No this is current science. Kids have to learn how to use lab equipment in order to do serious science in college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it is normal. One of my kids didn't get to do dissections because the teacher was morally opposed to it.
And y’all are OK with this nonsense?
Reason number 257,936,825,586 that my kids are in private schools.
Yes, I am ok with the kids not doing dissections.
You're posting on the wrong forum.
My kids are in SMSC and RMIB and just loving MCPS.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it is normal. One of my kids didn't get to do dissections because the teacher was morally opposed to it.
And y’all are OK with this nonsense?
Reason number 257,936,825,586 that my kids are in private schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are all talking dissections but there are a lot of hands on labs without animals. And the teacher saying the online ones are better is just lazy.
All of these school have labs. Use them!
They can not. Too crowded. See MSDE requirements.
Teachers could make this work by teaming with another teacher and rotating kids through lab days. I teach at a small private academy, and we make real science work in all kinds of conditions, including outside. Have parents volunteer to assist, etc.
Yet another way that kids are graduating high school with a subpar education.
It’s much easier with fewer kids and money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a science teacher I can think of a few reasons for no physical labs:
1. Not able to meet all accommodations (rare) or not enough para support.
2. Too many students so exceed MSDE regs
3. “Lazy teacher”, but accurately a teacher not getting enough support or leadership. Ordering can be a pain in so many ways and the expectation that teachers should spend their own money and time to get materials is not realistic or sustainable even if there is paperwork for reimbursement. Just one missing item (material, tool, reagent, glassware) missing from one station means the lab cannot happen.
4. Concerns about student behavior. One or two out of control students who are not able to work independently without distracting others can be enough to dissuade a teacher from hands on lessons.
5. Teachers who have health problems so need to focus on reliable lessons that can be done with a sub.
6. Too many preps. Once you get past two, labs can be a real pain to set up and put away through out the day. Some schools have lab assistants to help with this.
7. This is a big one right now: student attendance! If a lab is a major grade there is a need to make it up. So, it points all prep on slow mode in terms of putting things away and moving on. (Retake policies can create a similar issue).
Appreciate the thoughtful reply. Is there anything parents could do that would help (eg pressing district on any of these issues)? Or are there just too many obstacles that solving one or two would create more stress and pressure for the teachers?
Anonymous wrote:I think it is normal. One of my kids didn't get to do dissections because the teacher was morally opposed to it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are all talking dissections but there are a lot of hands on labs without animals. And the teacher saying the online ones are better is just lazy.
All of these school have labs. Use them!
They can not. Too crowded. See MSDE requirements.
Teachers could make this work by teaming with another teacher and rotating kids through lab days. I teach at a small private academy, and we make real science work in all kinds of conditions, including outside. Have parents volunteer to assist, etc.
Yet another way that kids are graduating high school with a subpar education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it is normal. One of my kids didn't get to do dissections because the teacher was morally opposed to it.
This is clearly untrue. MCPS has a set curriculum and every teacher in each subject has to abide by it-they can't just pick and choose. Nice try though.
Anonymous wrote:As a science teacher I can think of a few reasons for no physical labs:
1. Not able to meet all accommodations (rare) or not enough para support.
2. Too many students so exceed MSDE regs
3. “Lazy teacher”, but accurately a teacher not getting enough support or leadership. Ordering can be a pain in so many ways and the expectation that teachers should spend their own money and time to get materials is not realistic or sustainable even if there is paperwork for reimbursement. Just one missing item (material, tool, reagent, glassware) missing from one station means the lab cannot happen.
4. Concerns about student behavior. One or two out of control students who are not able to work independently without distracting others can be enough to dissuade a teacher from hands on lessons.
5. Teachers who have health problems so need to focus on reliable lessons that can be done with a sub.
6. Too many preps. Once you get past two, labs can be a real pain to set up and put away through out the day. Some schools have lab assistants to help with this.
7. This is a big one right now: student attendance! If a lab is a major grade there is a need to make it up. So, it points all prep on slow mode in terms of putting things away and moving on. (Retake policies can create a similar issue).