Anonymous wrote:Oh my. This breaks my heart. The kids are pillar to post. Can’t you see that? Imagine if that was your schedule right now?
Anonymous wrote:Oh my. This breaks my heart. The kids are pillar to post. Can’t you see that? Imagine if that was your schedule right now?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone ceded custody to make it easier for the child. I’m (mom) about to that place. My child doesn’t do well shuffling about so to protect him I’m willing to go 80/20 so he has stability.
My ex did. Every other Wednesday from after school until after dinner, and every other weekend. Wednesdays were like a playdate with Dad.
Anonymous wrote:Has anyone ceded custody to make it easier for the child. I’m (mom) about to that place. My child doesn’t do well shuffling about so to protect him I’m willing to go 80/20 so he has stability.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The thing about 2/2/5 is it's inconsistent as to days of the week. Some children do better with a schedule they can more easily understand, or there are logistical reasons to have them always in a certain home on a certain day of the week.
It's not inconsistent. Ex. Dc with Dad Mon/Tues, Dc with Mom Wed/Thu, rotate Fri Sat Sun.
Right, so Fri Sat Sun are inconsistent. Some kids or families find this hard, others don't.
OP, ask yourself if you would like to live on this schedule yourself. Would you find it burdensome, even if someone else packed your suitcase for you?
No, they are not inconsistent. One with Dad, one with Mom, repeat. And no suitcase needed-you live with your mother and your father and have needed items.
OP's not asking for your permission to divorce.
They are not consistent because the child has to alternate and consistently shuffle around. Of course we know OP does not need anyone's permission for divorce, but it is foolish to pretend that it won't be very damaging to the child. If the parents choose to have the child shuffle between two homes, then they are not choosing what is best for the child. They don't need anyone's permission, but should own up to their choice.
Quite a bit of evidence proves that kids do best in divorce when they get to keep being with both parents. I guess you would rather relegate one-probably Dad-to be the one the child 'visits'. My dc live with their parents and see them both nearly daily. But if you prefer to cut Dad (most likely) out-you should own up to your choice.
I’m not the PP but I will own up to this. If I got to decide, the children would live with the default parent after divorce (and that’s usually mom) and would visit the parent who has been more secondary in their life. So that the children have a clear home. I will own that opinion.
I think in some situations, that's best (particularly in cases of abuse) but many studies have shown that kids do best when they see both parents frequently.
Fine. But let them stay in one home 80 percent of the time.
Don't make your kids vagabonds.
They are children who live with both their parents.
Garbage!
They are basically orphans for as much as their parents care about them.
Kids stay put in one home. This is the only way!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The thing about 2/2/5 is it's inconsistent as to days of the week. Some children do better with a schedule they can more easily understand, or there are logistical reasons to have them always in a certain home on a certain day of the week.
It's not inconsistent. Ex. Dc with Dad Mon/Tues, Dc with Mom Wed/Thu, rotate Fri Sat Sun.
Right, so Fri Sat Sun are inconsistent. Some kids or families find this hard, others don't.
OP, ask yourself if you would like to live on this schedule yourself. Would you find it burdensome, even if someone else packed your suitcase for you?
No, they are not inconsistent. One with Dad, one with Mom, repeat. And no suitcase needed-you live with your mother and your father and have needed items.
OP's not asking for your permission to divorce.
They are not consistent because the child has to alternate and consistently shuffle around. Of course we know OP does not need anyone's permission for divorce, but it is foolish to pretend that it won't be very damaging to the child. If the parents choose to have the child shuffle between two homes, then they are not choosing what is best for the child. They don't need anyone's permission, but should own up to their choice.
Quite a bit of evidence proves that kids do best in divorce when they get to keep being with both parents. I guess you would rather relegate one-probably Dad-to be the one the child 'visits'. My dc live with their parents and see them both nearly daily. But if you prefer to cut Dad (most likely) out-you should own up to your choice.
I’m not the PP but I will own up to this. If I got to decide, the children would live with the default parent after divorce (and that’s usually mom) and would visit the parent who has been more secondary in their life. So that the children have a clear home. I will own that opinion.
I think in some situations, that's best (particularly in cases of abuse) but many studies have shown that kids do best when they see both parents frequently.
Fine. But let them stay in one home 80 percent of the time.
Don't make your kids vagabonds.
They are children who live with both their parents.
Anonymous wrote:What is 2-2-5? Mon-Tues, then Wednesday-Thursday, then Friday-Tuesday?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The thing about 2/2/5 is it's inconsistent as to days of the week. Some children do better with a schedule they can more easily understand, or there are logistical reasons to have them always in a certain home on a certain day of the week.
It's not inconsistent. Ex. Dc with Dad Mon/Tues, Dc with Mom Wed/Thu, rotate Fri Sat Sun.
Right, so Fri Sat Sun are inconsistent. Some kids or families find this hard, others don't.
OP, ask yourself if you would like to live on this schedule yourself. Would you find it burdensome, even if someone else packed your suitcase for you?
No, they are not inconsistent. One with Dad, one with Mom, repeat. And no suitcase needed-you live with your mother and your father and have needed items.
OP's not asking for your permission to divorce.
They are not consistent because the child has to alternate and consistently shuffle around. Of course we know OP does not need anyone's permission for divorce, but it is foolish to pretend that it won't be very damaging to the child. If the parents choose to have the child shuffle between two homes, then they are not choosing what is best for the child. They don't need anyone's permission, but should own up to their choice.
Quite a bit of evidence proves that kids do best in divorce when they get to keep being with both parents. I guess you would rather relegate one-probably Dad-to be the one the child 'visits'. My dc live with their parents and see them both nearly daily. But if you prefer to cut Dad (most likely) out-you should own up to your choice.
I’m not the PP but I will own up to this. If I got to decide, the children would live with the default parent after divorce (and that’s usually mom) and would visit the parent who has been more secondary in their life. So that the children have a clear home. I will own that opinion.
I think in some situations, that's best (particularly in cases of abuse) but many studies have shown that kids do best when they see both parents frequently.
Fine. But let them stay in one home 80 percent of the time.
Don't make your kids vagabonds.
They are children who live with both their parents.
Anonymous wrote:Did 2-2-5 work best for your 7 year old?
Right now, I have lots more job flexibility, so I get my kid from aftercare at 4:30 every day. My STBX is a good parent, but has a much more rigid job. He'd have to get a sitter from the end of aftercare (4:30) until 5:30/6 on his days. I will continue living near the school and would be happy to continue picking up from school at 4:30....but I worry that it'd be hard for my kid to come home to my house and then get picked up to go to her father's house at 5:30/6. On the one hand, I currently crave every hour possible with my kid....but I don't want to make it harder for her.
Thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The thing about 2/2/5 is it's inconsistent as to days of the week. Some children do better with a schedule they can more easily understand, or there are logistical reasons to have them always in a certain home on a certain day of the week.
It's not inconsistent. Ex. Dc with Dad Mon/Tues, Dc with Mom Wed/Thu, rotate Fri Sat Sun.
Right, so Fri Sat Sun are inconsistent. Some kids or families find this hard, others don't.
OP, ask yourself if you would like to live on this schedule yourself. Would you find it burdensome, even if someone else packed your suitcase for you?
No, they are not inconsistent. One with Dad, one with Mom, repeat. And no suitcase needed-you live with your mother and your father and have needed items.
OP's not asking for your permission to divorce.
They are not consistent because the child has to alternate and consistently shuffle around. Of course we know OP does not need anyone's permission for divorce, but it is foolish to pretend that it won't be very damaging to the child. If the parents choose to have the child shuffle between two homes, then they are not choosing what is best for the child. They don't need anyone's permission, but should own up to their choice.
Quite a bit of evidence proves that kids do best in divorce when they get to keep being with both parents. I guess you would rather relegate one-probably Dad-to be the one the child 'visits'. My dc live with their parents and see them both nearly daily. But if you prefer to cut Dad (most likely) out-you should own up to your choice.
I’m not the PP but I will own up to this. If I got to decide, the children would live with the default parent after divorce (and that’s usually mom) and would visit the parent who has been more secondary in their life. So that the children have a clear home. I will own that opinion.
I think in some situations, that's best (particularly in cases of abuse) but many studies have shown that kids do best when they see both parents frequently.