Anonymous wrote:People keep saying $300K, but you should expect the full cost to be closer to $95K/year when all is said and done.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know it dropped quite a bit this year, but wondering if it's still WashU/Emory level. Is it worth the cost over those schools?
It is not WashU/Emory level now, nor was it before; it’s a notch below. I also see Emory as a notch below WashU.
As for US News rankings, hadn’t it ranked Stanford as #6 for many years? Please.
If anything Emory is the best of the 3.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know it dropped quite a bit this year, but wondering if it's still WashU/Emory level. Is it worth the cost over those schools?
It is not WashU/Emory level now, nor was it before; it’s a notch below. I also see Emory as a notch below WashU.
As for US News rankings, hadn’t it ranked Stanford as #6 for many years? Please.
If anything Emory is the best of the 3.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you REALLY think the quality of NYU relative to WUSTL/Emory changed by much from year to year based on what USNWR rankings say? Exh A as to why ranking colleges as a whole is worse than meaningless.
Most undergrads in the T100 are good. But I'm only willing to pay 300k for a name brand with strong ascending reputation. Is that NYU? That's what I'm asking.
You are an idiot.
If money is not much of an object, NYU is a great brand and choice.
Yes, it’s in a safe, well-run city where the streets are clean, the drivers are sane, & all of its diverse citizens embrace each other’s individual value in the dazzling array of customs & languages.
Best of all, it’s affordable for college kids, & has many wholesome activities for people of all ages. Yes sir, a degree from NYU is a passport to success & acceptance across the country, because whether it’s Alabama or Idaho, everyone brightens up when they know a real New Yorker has just walked in the door.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you REALLY think the quality of NYU relative to WUSTL/Emory changed by much from year to year based on what USNWR rankings say? Exh A as to why ranking colleges as a whole is worse than meaningless.
Most undergrads in the T100 are good. But I'm only willing to pay 300k for a name brand with strong ascending reputation. Is that NYU? That's what I'm asking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you REALLY think the quality of NYU relative to WUSTL/Emory changed by much from year to year based on what USNWR rankings say? Exh A as to why ranking colleges as a whole is worse than meaningless.
Most undergrads in the T100 are good. But I'm only willing to pay 300k for a name brand with strong ascending reputation. Is that NYU? That's what I'm asking.
Absolutely, schools like NYU, USC, and Northeastern will keep on rising.
USC is known as a school for those who couldn't get into its rival - UCLA. In terms of quality, location, and cost, many choose USC only after they were rejected by UCLA. I am inclined to think the same thing with NYU, US News ranked #35. It's an option for those who didn't make the cut at Stony Brook -- SUNY, US News ranked #58,
Couldn’t be more wrong!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know it dropped quite a bit this year, but wondering if it's still WashU/Emory level. Is it worth the cost over those schools?
It is not WashU/Emory level now, nor was it before; it’s a notch below. I also see Emory as a notch below WashU.
As for US News rankings, hadn’t it ranked Stanford as #6 for many years? Please.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know it dropped quite a bit this year, but wondering if it's still WashU/Emory level. Is it worth the cost over those schools?
It is not WashU/Emory level now, nor was it before; it’s a notch below. I also see Emory as a notch below WashU.
As for US News rankings, hadn’t it ranked Stanford as #6 for many years? Please.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you REALLY think the quality of NYU relative to WUSTL/Emory changed by much from year to year based on what USNWR rankings say? Exh A as to why ranking colleges as a whole is worse than meaningless.
Most undergrads in the T100 are good. But I'm only willing to pay 300k for a name brand with strong ascending reputation. Is that NYU? That's what I'm asking.
You are an idiot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you REALLY think the quality of NYU relative to WUSTL/Emory changed by much from year to year based on what USNWR rankings say? Exh A as to why ranking colleges as a whole is worse than meaningless.
Most undergrads in the T100 are good. But I'm only willing to pay 300k for a name brand with strong ascending reputation. Is that NYU? That's what I'm asking.
Absolutely, schools like NYU, USC, and Northeastern will keep on rising.
USC is known as a school for those who couldn't get into its rival - UCLA. In terms of quality, location, and cost, many choose USC only after they were rejected by UCLA. I am inclined to think the same thing with NYU, US News ranked #35. It's an option for those who didn't make the cut at Stony Brook -- SUNY, US News ranked #58,
Anonymous wrote:Certainly recognizable name. A student will have to grow up immediately. Exact opposite of a hand holding, "nurturing" SLAC.
Anonymous wrote:I know it dropped quite a bit this year, but wondering if it's still WashU/Emory level. Is it worth the cost over those schools?
Anonymous wrote:It’s 39 right?