Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Then your child was not listening well.
At the back to school night different teachers filled in during different periods. The teacher who filled in during DC's period was very clear there was no application this year for the first time. The kids were apparently discussing today and everyone else seemed to know this according to DC.
Sounds like my kid was listening just fine and other kids got the same info, but thanks.
Also if you mean no test, this is not the first time, so maybe you weren’t listening well!
NP. I'm pretty sure the words used were no formal application process or something like that. I don't know about any test but your posts make me feel really lucky we don't have to interact with parents in high school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Then your child was not listening well.
At the back to school night different teachers filled in during different periods. The teacher who filled in during DC's period was very clear there was no application this year for the first time. The kids were apparently discussing today and everyone else seemed to know this according to DC.
Sounds like my kid was listening just fine and other kids got the same info, but thanks.
Also if you mean no test, this is not the first time, so maybe you weren’t listening well!
NP. I'm pretty sure the words used were no formal application process or something like that. I don't know about any test but your posts make me feel really lucky we don't have to interact with parents in high school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Then your child was not listening well.
At the back to school night different teachers filled in during different periods. The teacher who filled in during DC's period was very clear there was no application this year for the first time. The kids were apparently discussing today and everyone else seemed to know this according to DC.
Sounds like my kid was listening just fine and other kids got the same info, but thanks.
Also if you mean no test, this is not the first time, so maybe you weren’t listening well!
Anonymous wrote:Then your child was not listening well.
At the back to school night different teachers filled in during different periods. The teacher who filled in during DC's period was very clear there was no application this year for the first time. The kids were apparently discussing today and everyone else seemed to know this according to DC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Students just got their schedules updated if they got into the accelerated path.
In ParentVue? Or via email? My kid hasn’t been updated in ParentVue I guess that means they werent accelerated? Kid has 100% so far in comp sci so assumed they would be accelerated given that they requested it. Do you know anything more?
DC has 100% too but is not from TPMS so we encouraged them not to do it. They said everyone that asked for the path by the deadline should have had their schedules updated as all the kids were comparing schedules.
Who said this and when? By email?
They told the kids a few weeks ago in school that if you asked for the path by filling out the Google form you were automatically approved. There was no application this year. The CS person who did the presentation at the open house or back to school night said something similar.
I'm sure they reserve the right to discourage your child from taking it if your child has a C or another low grade of course but really if you had a bad grade why would your child want to create more work for herself anyway?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Students just got their schedules updated if they got into the accelerated path.
In ParentVue? Or via email? My kid hasn’t been updated in ParentVue I guess that means they werent accelerated? Kid has 100% so far in comp sci so assumed they would be accelerated given that they requested it. Do you know anything more?
DC has 100% too but is not from TPMS so we encouraged them not to do it. They said everyone that asked for the path by the deadline should have had their schedules updated as all the kids were comparing schedules.
Who said this and when? By email?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Students just got their schedules updated if they got into the accelerated path.
In ParentVue? Or via email? My kid hasn’t been updated in ParentVue I guess that means they werent accelerated? Kid has 100% so far in comp sci so assumed they would be accelerated given that they requested it. Do you know anything more?
It's changed on StudentVue, parents can see the schedule on ParentVue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Students just got their schedules updated if they got into the accelerated path.
In ParentVue? Or via email? My kid hasn’t been updated in ParentVue I guess that means they werent accelerated? Kid has 100% so far in comp sci so assumed they would be accelerated given that they requested it. Do you know anything more?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Students just got their schedules updated if they got into the accelerated path.
In ParentVue? Or via email? My kid hasn’t been updated in ParentVue I guess that means they werent accelerated? Kid has 100% so far in comp sci so assumed they would be accelerated given that they requested it. Do you know anything more?
DC has 100% too but is not from TPMS so we encouraged them not to do it. They said everyone that asked for the path by the deadline should have had their schedules updated as all the kids were comparing schedules.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Students just got their schedules updated if they got into the accelerated path.
In ParentVue? Or via email? My kid hasn’t been updated in ParentVue I guess that means they werent accelerated? Kid has 100% so far in comp sci so assumed they would be accelerated given that they requested it. Do you know anything more?
Anonymous wrote:Students just got their schedules updated if they got into the accelerated path.