Anonymous wrote:What the hell is Congress going to do about crime? They won't even fix the damn gun problem. Congress is worthless wherever it comes to crime and anyone suggesting a federal takeover is a delusional crackpot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In 2023, we've seen a worrying spike in crime: over 900 carjackings, up from 485 last year, with a high percentage involving juveniles and firearms. We've also hit a 20-year high in homicides, matching the grim statistics of 2003. With violent crime up by 40% and property crime by 25%, these aren't just numbers – they represent a growing threat to our safety.
This leads us to a crucial question: should the federal government intervene? The Constitution gives Congress significant power over D.C., allowing it to step in, especially in crisis situations where local governance struggles. This is a rare and complex decision, balancing local autonomy against federal oversight.
Is it time to consider federal action to address these serious safety concerns? Your thoughts on this delicate balance are crucial for a meaningful discussion.
Looking forward to hearing from you,
No, now please go back to whatever midwestern city you are from.
Anonymous wrote:In 2023, we've seen a worrying spike in crime: over 900 carjackings, up from 485 last year, with a high percentage involving juveniles and firearms. We've also hit a 20-year high in homicides, matching the grim statistics of 2003. With violent crime up by 40% and property crime by 25%, these aren't just numbers – they represent a growing threat to our safety.
This leads us to a crucial question: should the federal government intervene? The Constitution gives Congress significant power over D.C., allowing it to step in, especially in crisis situations where local governance struggles. This is a rare and complex decision, balancing local autonomy against federal oversight.
Is it time to consider federal action to address these serious safety concerns? Your thoughts on this delicate balance are crucial for a meaningful discussion.
Looking forward to hearing from you,
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The federal government is the entity most responsible for the recent crime wave - USAO dropping charges and super lenient federal judges. Plus, the weirdo Republican judges who are hamstringing MPD from arresting people carrying illegal guns.
The Feds are sandbagging DC.
Explain, please?
https://www.wusa9.com/amp/article/news/investigations/matthew-graves-us-attorney-4th-amendment-cases-lost/65-93c2162b-41f2-4caf-b37f-30d95c4a4cdf
Anonymous wrote:This thread has to be a joke. Congress can't even pick a Speaker, let alone deal with crime. They are even more dysfunctional than our crappy Council and Mayor.
Anonymous wrote:DC should be a small Federal District and the rest of the district should be a part of MD and/or VA. Voting rights solved, Feds responsible for their portions of it, states handle the rest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC should be a small Federal District and the rest of the district should be a part of MD and/or VA. Voting rights solved, Feds responsible for their portions of it, states handle the rest.
I agree. This needs to be addressed. I could give 2 hoots about DC statehood..we just need the chaos to end. - DC Native Born
Anonymous wrote:DC should be a small Federal District and the rest of the district should be a part of MD and/or VA. Voting rights solved, Feds responsible for their portions of it, states handle the rest.