Anonymous wrote:Meh, there are some holes to the theory. Not all A students are rule followers. Some are just competitive and ambitious, while others are naturally able to get As.
Also, the outgoing, social student can also get all As; they aren't mutually exclusive.
Anonymous wrote:I had a 77 average in HS and graduated college after 5 years with a 2.6 GPA in a generic business mgt degree from a commuter school college.
Other than first job out of college where people ask GPA did not matter.
I was in the managing training program of an investment bank on Wall Street by 24. I was a Director in the Big Four, had a big corner office with lots of staff including Harvard. My current job doing great I also got my MBA at night and barely graduated with a 3.0 GPA absolute minimum to graduate.
Tons of my friends have big jobs. My one friend graduated with a 1.96 GPA they rounded to 2 the minimum to graduate. He is a Doctor and Author and has worked with US Presidents, the drug dealer frin college is a lawyer, my pink rocker friend is a managing director. The C students have higher incomes in their 40s/50s than A students. That’s a fact.
Anonymous wrote:PP above - the most common mistake people make about how grades impact business success is whether someone goes into a corp business as a top mgr which requires a degree. But if you're going to start your own co from ground up, honestly, yiu just need to know to build a book. That's something books can't teach you though I will suggest golf is still a good game to know. Seriously though, you really can't teach BD/sales in terms of building a business. Corp sales is a bit different but when it's your own co it's more about ambitions and drive v precision and details sometimes. Getting As typically requires the ability to test well and sometimes you just don't need that in real life. Reading people is a skill as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nah OP. That was 1950s logic when only white, WASP men, were in the professional world ( Jewish men hired "their own". It was called a " gentleman's C" ( note the exclusion of women). Hopefully, you are trolling; otherwise, you are a terrible role model for your kid(s).
Exactly!
I love how those white people are fantasizing that they still have the same white privilege in climbing the corporate ladder using the corrupt "network" and "connections".
Anonymous wrote:I'm going to disagree with this. If I'm a hiring manager and see less than a 3.5, I wonder what the person was doing instead of studying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's been said that the A students work for the B students, the C students run the businesses, and the D students dedicate the buildings.
Now, just to be clear, this adage clearly doesn't apply in fields like medicine, engineering and, to a large extent, law, all of which are highly GPA-driven. You won't make it into the door of any med school or halfway decent law school if most of your grades aren't A's.
But in business majors, I think there's some truth to the C-students-rule-the-world theory. Although exceptions abound, students who get 4.0's tend to be follow-the-rules, color-inside-the-lines types who spend college with their nose in a book, refusing to take risks or buck the system. These traits are invaluable to a surgeon or an airline pilot, but in the business world, they often lead to becoming a yes-man who never rises above middle management as opposed to a trailblazer who runs the show.
Another problem with A students is that many of them have been told their whole lives by well-meaning parents and teachers that grades are king and as long as they keep those up, doors will open for them. Again, that's true if your dream is to be a doctor, but for business-minded students, prioritizing grades over socializing and networking can set you on a path to mediocrity. Take two business majors, a 4.0 library shut-in and a 2.9 fraternity president and intramural team captain, and check on them a decade after graduation. My money is on the frat god having the more successful career.
So, what are everyone's thoughts? Is it possible we push kids to focus too much on grades, especially in fields where making top grades often comes at the expense of what actually matters for success?
Sorry I just don’t see this play out in real life. The C students don’t necessarily go to college, and if they do it’s a struggle and they are more likely to drop out or flunk out. They tend to have less focus.
From my experience, the A and B students tend to be goal-oriented and leadership-oriented. And leader doesn’t have to mean extroverted presidential type running everything, but simply being a SME and top performer in their area.
As a hiring manager at a F50 company, we don’t look at nor want the C students. Why should we? Why would we? Past performance is the best predictor we have for future performance, so we put our bets on the A/B students and grads that have proven they are high performers.
You are supporting OP's claim that A/B students are employees, and others are independent business founders.
No. You must have been that C student with those poor reading comprehension skills.
The C students that I personally know have ended up as tradesmen/women, police, firemen, teachers, LPNs, low-level office workers, sole proprietor landscape company owners, strippers, high school football coaches, truck drivers and bums. In other words they tend to end up in very average middle class jobs. There is nothing wrong with that, and yes there are exceptions.
But far and away, the A/B students had an entirely different trajectory in life than the C and D/F students I knew. And that goes for both high school and college.