Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Didn't high school have a lot of athletes, people in plays, etc.? Don't know why college would be any different.
Time to grow up.
(New Poster)
Time to grow up ? Please reread your post; you are making the point that LACs are just like redoing high school. I agree.
Anonymous wrote:I would very much agree that the NESCAC schools all felt like elite boarding schools when we visited for sports recruiting. They are have their charm and nice amenities but are in the middle of nowhere and small. DC ended up at the Claremont colleges which have a nice consortium and provides a larger community (close to 7K), plus much better weather. Also, at least from our private, all of the mean and cliquey kids went to NESCAC’s so we were glad to avoid them at the end of the day.
Anonymous wrote:Didn't high school have a lot of athletes, people in plays, etc.? Don't know why college would be any different.
Time to grow up.
Anonymous wrote:We are at a NESCAC and don't want to get specific because I think it's the same everywhere.But a warning to those of you looking at colleges that if you're not on a team or in a singing group or theatre group, your social life will be trying to find those few others on campus who aren't affiliated with a big team or club. The club activities are not steady enough to create any kind of real bond. And the teams are so exclusionary -- they eat together and party together. It sucks. We were attracted to these schools because of their size, but they wind up feeling like high school, only less mingling.
Anonymous wrote:New poster but neighbor just complained about this with her child who is in a selective Liberal Arts college who doesn't play sports, isn't into theater or music. She said it is even harder to make friends if your child is not religious. There were fraternities for jewish students, several Christian clubs, Catholic group, etc. Her child is looking to transfer to a flagship state school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know a kid at Bowdoin who had this issue and is trying to transfer out.
My Bowdoin non-athlete is not having this issue. Has joined lots of activities (music, club sport, clubs) and met lots of people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some of us are just trying to share the benefit of our experiences. Many many SLAC student newspapers write about this us vs them issue with athletes and NARP’s. Not a made up issue.
If you don’t actually name the school, it’s useless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP - what's a NARP?
I hate perpetuate this annoying acronym but nonathlete regular person
This wins the award for the dumbest acronym I’ve ever seen on DCUM.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It might just be people trying to get others to not accept offers at the SLACS because of the small number of spaces offered. So, don't always believe what you read on the net.
It’s definitely something that is discussed online. I think SLACs offer tons of good opportunities. But BIPOC, non-wealthy, and/or non-athletes have described not fitting in some of these schools. So it’s definitely a consideration for those of us researching them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP - what's a NARP?
I hate perpetuate this annoying acronym but nonathlete regular person
Anonymous wrote:One truth about almost all colleges, whether it's a selective LAC or a big university: You can't rely on your classes or your dorms as place to make friends. Especially as an undergraduate, and you're coming into a new place where you don't know anybody.
You've got to do something outside of class, whether it's a sport, a theater group, the school newspaper or radio station, or even just a regular boardgame night or movie-watching club. It took me a while to realize this (at my big state school), and college life was much more comfortable once I started doing regular extracurriculars.