Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is being heard by the TX Supreme Court right now. Mother of God, this is so disgusting. Hey forced-birthers, you're awfully quiet.
At least they’re doing this fast instead of making her wait. Good god this is absolutely sadism from Paxton.
One thing's for sure - this case exposes the lie that anti-abortion laws have exceptions that are clear and understandable and that doctors and hospitals and healthcare workers and pregnant women don't need to fear being prosecuted for making the decision to make use of those exceptions.
Boy howdy does that ever need “/s” at the end.
Anonymous wrote:And... the Texas Supreme Court aholes pause the lower court, blocking the woman getting the HEALTHCARE she needs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is being heard by the TX Supreme Court right now. Mother of God, this is so disgusting. Hey forced-birthers, you're awfully quiet.
At least they’re doing this fast instead of making her wait. Good god this is absolutely sadism from Paxton.
One thing's for sure - this case exposes the lie that anti-abortion laws have exceptions that are clear and understandable and that doctors and hospitals and healthcare workers and pregnant women don't need to fear being prosecuted for making the decision to make use of those exceptions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is being heard by the TX Supreme Court right now. Mother of God, this is so disgusting. Hey forced-birthers, you're awfully quiet.
At least they’re doing this fast instead of making her wait. Good god this is absolutely sadism from Paxton.
Anonymous wrote:This is being heard by the TX Supreme Court right now. Mother of God, this is so disgusting. Hey forced-birthers, you're awfully quiet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is being heard by the TX Supreme Court right now. Mother of God, this is so disgusting. Hey forced-birthers, you're awfully quiet.
That's because politically they know it's not a popular thing to argue. But they're actually pleased with this. This is exactly what they want. They don't care about women's suffering. At all.
And you know what one of the worst things is (besides this poor woman's suffering)? That if something terrible would happen to her as she's waiting, if she died, nearly died, or lost her uterus and can't have another child, the anti-abortionists who support this extremism wouldn't feel all that bad about it. There would be no self-reflection or thinking, gosh, this law is not serving its purpose. They'd say, oh isn't that too bad, thoughts and prayers, and move on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is being heard by the TX Supreme Court right now. Mother of God, this is so disgusting. Hey forced-birthers, you're awfully quiet.
That's because politically they know it's not a popular thing to argue. But they're actually pleased with this. This is exactly what they want. They don't care about women's suffering. At all.
Anonymous wrote:This is being heard by the TX Supreme Court right now. Mother of God, this is so disgusting. Hey forced-birthers, you're awfully quiet.
Anonymous wrote:This is being heard by the TX Supreme Court right now. Mother of God, this is so disgusting. Hey forced-birthers, you're awfully quiet.
Anonymous wrote:New: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has asked the state Supreme Court to intervene and stop a Dallas woman from having an abortion.
The AG's petition comes after a Travis County district judge cleared the way for Kate Cox to terminate her pregnancy.
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/12/08/texas-abortion-lawsuit-ken-paxton/?utm_campaign=trib-social&utm_content=1702069399&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter