Anonymous wrote:Think it will be JHU
Anonymous wrote:Have you looked at their website lately? I agree with OP. The language used and institutional priorities seem very clear. Not a bad thing, but I would bet legacy isn't really used much longer there unless they are related to very large and involved donors. Even then selectively.Anonymous wrote:I highly doubt Princeton will be getting rid of legacy. The Princeton legacy admits from our school were the most egregious.
Anonymous wrote:They charge double for the wealthier families so they can have the rest go for free instead of making it affordable for ev.
does a paid off home count as assets in this senario?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In other words, nobody pays anything. It will probably be Princeton. Also, they'll get rid of legacy at same time.
I get that they take in a lot of money in tuition, but they already have half the kids going for nothing. And they don't need the money. And they'll be able to get rid of a pretty large and expensive administrative department.
I think it will start as tuition only and within another few years, 5 or so other colleges will follow.
Nothing new here. Columbia is already free tuition for families making <$150,000.
only if you have under 200k in assets.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In other words, nobody pays anything. It will probably be Princeton. Also, they'll get rid of legacy at same time.
I get that they take in a lot of money in tuition, but they already have half the kids going for nothing. And they don't need the money. And they'll be able to get rid of a pretty large and expensive administrative department.
I think it will start as tuition only and within another few years, 5 or so other colleges will follow.
Nothing new here. Columbia is already free tuition for families making <$150,000.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think there are people here who think all families who are paying full price are doing it by ripping out a check without another thought. "no problem paying" etc.
I live in a 2 bedroom, 1 bath apartment in Brooklyn. The Princeton NPC says we can afford the full boat. LOL, what? Part of it is how we earn money (solo member LLCs with okay income - under 200k - that limits what we can put into retirement), part of it is how we spend money (toggling off HULU every 6 months, staying in the apartment we bought 25 years ago), part of it is how we save money (dollar cost averaging every single month no matter what).
We can't spend 400k for college. We have no inheritance on the way. We have to think about long term care for one of us
A lot of people don't even apply. Why would Princeton or another school make this move? Because at some point they'll wake up and realize 40 billion is enough money for a medium sized university and they will start to use some of the money it throws off. They could cover tuition for all and their endowment would still grow by a few billion a year.
While I understand your argument, something doesn't add up, literally. We make $250 in the DMV, and the Princeton NPC has us getting pretty significant aid, bringing price down to about $30K. Is is that you have significant assets that are counted (i.e., not retirement, not home equity)?
Anonymous wrote:In other words, nobody pays anything. It will probably be Princeton. Also, they'll get rid of legacy at same time.
I get that they take in a lot of money in tuition, but they already have half the kids going for nothing. And they don't need the money. And they'll be able to get rid of a pretty large and expensive administrative department.
I think it will start as tuition only and within another few years, 5 or so other colleges will follow.