Anonymous wrote:There's no reason to add your pension or expected social security to your net worth. Just deduct them from the income you calculate you need in retirement. They're not liquid assets.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think you will get Social Security plus a government pension.
That is correct for the old plan. There is a SS offset. I think you get some of it though.
With FERS and anyone who joined the government after 1984 has FERS, you get full SS plus pension. As an employee you are paying just as much in to SS as you would as a private sector employee
Yes. Also, if you retire under FERS before you are eligible for SS, you get a supplement to your pension until you are 62.
https://plan-your-federal-retirement.com/fers-supplement/#:~:text=Special%20Benefit%20for%20Some%20FERS%20Who%20Retire%20Before%20Age%2062&text=The%20FERS%20Supplement%20is%20also,until%20you%20reach%20age%2062.
This but you do not get the 10% multiplier (ever) or COLAS until you turn 62. The latter can be impactful over time.
Yes, but if you have enough, you have 5 years to do what you want to do instead of going to work. Some people don't need more $, but would love more time. That's the value of knowing how much is enough.
Anonymous wrote:The value of a pension = Annual pension amount divided by a reasonable rate of return multiplied by a percentage probability the pension will be paid until death
Annual pension: $67,500
A reasonable rate of return divisor: 2.55%
Percentage probability of pension being paid until death: 95%
Value of pension = ($67,500 / 0.0255) X 0.95 = $2,514,706
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think you will get Social Security plus a government pension.
That is correct for the old plan. There is a SS offset. I think you get some of it though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous
three pages and still no one gives an answer...
No several have answered. 66k/year is equivalent to about 1.6 m in 401k
No way. That’s too high.
DP.
???
That's exactly what I would have calculated.
As a PP pointed out, a $75k/year annuity can be bought at $1M these days. So 66k/year should be less than $1M.
Anonymous wrote:The value of a pension = Annual pension amount divided by a reasonable rate of return multiplied by a percentage probability the pension will be paid until death
Annual pension: $67,500
A reasonable rate of return divisor: 2.55%
Percentage probability of pension being paid until death: 95%
Value of pension = ($67,500 / 0.0255) X 0.95 = $2,514,706
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think you will get Social Security plus a government pension.
That is correct for the old plan. There is a SS offset. I think you get some of it though.
With FERS and anyone who joined the government after 1984 has FERS, you get full SS plus pension. As an employee you are paying just as much in to SS as you would as a private sector employee
Yes. Also, if you retire under FERS before you are eligible for SS, you get a supplement to your pension until you are 62.
https://plan-your-federal-retirement.com/fers-supplement/#:~:text=Special%20Benefit%20for%20Some%20FERS%20Who%20Retire%20Before%20Age%2062&text=The%20FERS%20Supplement%20is%20also,until%20you%20reach%20age%2062.
This but you do not get the 10% multiplier (ever) or COLAS until you turn 62. The latter can be impactful over time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous
three pages and still no one gives an answer...
No several have answered. 66k/year is equivalent to about 1.6 m in 401k
No way. That’s too high.
DP.
???
That's exactly what I would have calculated.