Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kilmer parent here - I spoke directly to administration yesterday and felt confident that they determined there was little to no risk. My kid went to school today and it was fine. Hate all you want on Kilmer. My kid is in aap and is happy there. It's a good school.
Interesting distinction you voluntarily offered up here. Are you saying that bc your kid goes to the same school but is essentially segregated by race/soci-economic status via placement in AAP classes apart from the rest of the population, the school is fine for YOUR kid? Or are you saying it’s a good school for all the kids?
Just wondering what motivated you to signal that your child is “in aap” in this context?
Anonymous wrote:Did the school say Ethan Crumbley wasn't a threat either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AAP parents are so offensive when they want to be and at Kilmer, they can be especially snobby. They're in for a rude awakening when their darlings get to HS. Those misbehaving GenEd kids will be everywhere. That being said, the divide at Kilmer is stark and Kilmer itself to blame with their "team system". It doesn't have to be that bad and the kids ought to be and should be mixed up in the team system.
I feel like Kilmer is not as bad. And Kilmer like other MS schools have Honors classes. The AAP and Honors kids all do end up together in high school.
I have literally never heard of the "divide." Must be something for people with a general chip on their shoulder. My son is in AAP and is friends with kids both in and out of AAP from his electives. It is not even a thing that comes up among the kids so it's a weird thing to be fixated on. Lol "the great divide" oh no I'm so scared of the divide
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AAP parents are so offensive when they want to be and at Kilmer, they can be especially snobby. They're in for a rude awakening when their darlings get to HS. Those misbehaving GenEd kids will be everywhere. That being said, the divide at Kilmer is stark and Kilmer itself to blame with their "team system". It doesn't have to be that bad and the kids ought to be and should be mixed up in the team system.
I feel like Kilmer is not as bad. And Kilmer like other MS schools have Honors classes. The AAP and Honors kids all do end up together in high school.
Anonymous wrote:AAP parents are so offensive when they want to be and at Kilmer, they can be especially snobby. They're in for a rude awakening when their darlings get to HS. Those misbehaving GenEd kids will be everywhere. That being said, the divide at Kilmer is stark and Kilmer itself to blame with their "team system". It doesn't have to be that bad and the kids ought to be and should be mixed up in the team system.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kilmer parent here - I spoke directly to administration yesterday and felt confident that they determined there was little to no risk. My kid went to school today and it was fine. Hate all you want on Kilmer. My kid is in aap and is happy there. It's a good school.
Interesting distinction you voluntarily offered up here. Are you saying that bc your kid goes to the same school but is essentially segregated by race/soci-economic status via placement in AAP classes apart from the rest of the population, the school is fine for YOUR kid? Or are you saying it’s a good school for all the kids?
Just wondering what motivated you to signal that your child is “in aap” in this context?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kilmer parent here - I spoke directly to administration yesterday and felt confident that they determined there was little to no risk. My kid went to school today and it was fine. Hate all you want on Kilmer. My kid is in aap and is happy there. It's a good school.
I appreciated this post until the writer felt the need to include that the child is in AAP, as if that makes any difference in this school safety discussion. Some of you AAP parents make me shake my head.
Reminds me of the old adage “how do you know if someone is in law school? Don’t worry, they will tell you.” Except apply this to being an AAP parent
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kilmer parent here - I spoke directly to administration yesterday and felt confident that they determined there was little to no risk. My kid went to school today and it was fine. Hate all you want on Kilmer. My kid is in aap and is happy there. It's a good school.
Interesting distinction you voluntarily offered up here. Are you saying that bc your kid goes to the same school but is essentially segregated by race/soci-economic status via placement in AAP classes apart from the rest of the population, the school is fine for YOUR kid? Or are you saying it’s a good school for all the kids?
Just wondering what motivated you to signal that your child is “in aap” in this context?
DP. I have a kid there now, not in AAP. We are happy with the school and she reported feeling safe yesterday. She said she’s never felt anything but safe there. My other kid went through Kilmer, also not in AAP and even had a IEP. He also felt safe.
I don’t know these kids or what happened but fights in schools have been happening forever. I hope they took the threat seriously and determined it wasn’t a threat, as they told us. I’m speculating but can imagine how things could be said during a fight that aren’t a legit threat to the community. I remember seeing a few fights back when I was in school.
Anonymous wrote:Kilmer parent here - I spoke directly to administration yesterday and felt confident that they determined there was little to no risk. My kid went to school today and it was fine. Hate all you want on Kilmer. My kid is in aap and is happy there. It's a good school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kilmer parent here - I spoke directly to administration yesterday and felt confident that they determined there was little to no risk. My kid went to school today and it was fine. Hate all you want on Kilmer. My kid is in aap and is happy there. It's a good school.
Interesting distinction you voluntarily offered up here. Are you saying that bc your kid goes to the same school but is essentially segregated by race/soci-economic status via placement in AAP classes apart from the rest of the population, the school is fine for YOUR kid? Or are you saying it’s a good school for all the kids?
Just wondering what motivated you to signal that your child is “in aap” in this context?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kilmer parent here - I spoke directly to administration yesterday and felt confident that they determined there was little to no risk. My kid went to school today and it was fine. Hate all you want on Kilmer. My kid is in aap and is happy there. It's a good school.
Interesting distinction you voluntarily offered up here. Are you saying that bc your kid goes to the same school but is essentially segregated by race/soci-economic status via placement in AAP classes apart from the rest of the population, the school is fine for YOUR kid? Or are you saying it’s a good school for all the kids?
Just wondering what motivated you to signal that your child is “in aap” in this context?
Anonymous wrote:Kilmer parent here - I spoke directly to administration yesterday and felt confident that they determined there was little to no risk. My kid went to school today and it was fine. Hate all you want on Kilmer. My kid is in aap and is happy there. It's a good school.
Anonymous wrote:Kilmer parent here - I spoke directly to administration yesterday and felt confident that they determined there was little to no risk. My kid went to school today and it was fine. Hate all you want on Kilmer. My kid is in aap and is happy there. It's a good school.