More lies debunked, yet Joe gets a pass.. again

If these 82k emails are released (not holding my breath), Biden will drop out or lose bigly

Anonymous wrote:I don't think anybody on the Dem side wants to say this out loud but...if Biden drops out then one of two things happen: 1) Harris is on top of the ticket and she's just as flawed a candidate as he is, or 2) Harris gets replaced by somebody else, alienating a large portion of their base.

The only thing that could prevent Biden from being the Dem nominee again would be a totally debilitating stroke or heart attack that left him physically incapable of running. If that were to happen, there is NO WAY primary voters (or DNC delegates, if it occurred after the primary schedule finished) wouldn’t choose the sitting Vice President, Kamala Harris, to be the Dem nominee. They are not going to pick Gavin Newsom or Gretchen Whitmer. Not a chance.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Creepy Joe strikes again

What has happened in America that being friendly to kids is creepy but exposing “grabbing women by the p***” is acceptable? I didn’t think Biden was creepy in that clip but I’m not a f*** up MAGA &Q follower.

That should be espousing….

Anonymous wrote:Creepy Joe strikes again

What has happened in America that being friendly to kids is creepy but exposing “grabbing women by the p***” is acceptable? I didn’t think Biden was creepy in that clip but I’m not a f*** up MAGA &Q follower.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He won’t drop out. But the DNC will select someone else at the Convention. Bank on it.

The DNC doesn’t select the nominee. Primary voters and pledged delegates do. Whoever has the most pledged delegates will be the nominee, end of story. The only way to “force” Biden out is to convince primary voters in each state to pick one of the alternatives. At this point the only option is Dean Phillips. Once the convention rolls around, it is way way too late.

The DNC can do whatever it wants. Biden will not be the candidate regardless of what the outcome of the primary is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Biden is running. He’s too angry and proud to go out looking like a complete failure compared to Trump who is now looking golden.

90+ indictments says what now?

All brought by insane wild eyed liberals. All normal people see the illegitimacy. It makes him even more popular.

Take a moment and rethink that.

For example, we have:

- federal judges, appointed by Trump, who issued search warrants
- at the request of the FBI director who was appointed by Trump,
- that were executed by DOJ attorneys appointed by Trump,
- who charged Trump with violating a law, that was passed by Trump
- There is hardly a single witness involved who is a Democrat
- The witnesses testifying against Trump are almost all handpicked by Trump, to include
- Trump's own lawyers
- Trump's own employees
- Trump's own communications
- Communications from Trump's own employees, advisors and laywers
- Photos and recordings from Trump's own employees, advisors and lawyers

Yet you somehow think this is entirely "insane wild eyed liberals"
Yet you somehow think you know better than TRUMP'S OWN PEOPLE WHO WERE ACTUALLY THERE WHEN EVERYTHING HAPPENED?

Truly bizarre. You are in COMPLETE DENIAL of reality.

Creepy Joe strikes again

Posters here are so “smart”
They don’t even know how candidates make it to the ballot.
Good luck with your third party fantasies

Anonymous wrote:He won’t drop out. But the DNC will select someone else at the Convention. Bank on it.

The DNC doesn’t select the nominee. Primary voters and pledged delegates do. Whoever has the most pledged delegates will be the nominee, end of story. The only way to “force” Biden out is to convince primary voters in each state to pick one of the alternatives. At this point the only option is Dean Phillips. Once the convention rolls around, it is way way too late.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think they are going to make a switch closer to election day. I've believed this for a long time, because it went from "he won't run again" to inexplicably, him running again.

I think the idea is that Trump does worse when he's up against a relative unknown. So, we know both Biden and Trump, and that's good for Trump. The reason he beat Hillary is because we knew Hillary and she was strongly disliked. Biden is also strongly disliked, and this is all great for Trump. But, you replace Biden with someone that people have only vague familiarity with. And that's bad for Trump. People are more likely to go for the unknown.

I thought Biden won in 2020 because he WAS a safe, known commodity.

Biden was safe in 2020. He was an asset for the Democratic party and the country in 2020. In 2024, he is a liability for being one of the few possible candidates out there that could lose to Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why doesn't Biden drop out and let someone else run? We will lose if he runs again please drop out
now

1) he is the sitting president. when was the last time a sitting president was forced out? (never in the 20th or 21st century)
.

1981.

Your presidential cycles are off a cog. There was no presidential election in 1981. Who are you claiming was forced out?

Biden is doing a great job and I'll be proud to vote for him again.

I think pp is referring to Carter who lost the election to Reagan in a landslide in 1980 and took office in 1981.
Then, there was George Bush who lost to Clinton in 1992.
And, then most recently, Trump lost to Biden.

I think all 3 of these are examples of being "forced out" by voters.

Now, if you are talking "forced out" as in the DNC forcing Biden out to replace him with someone else, that is a different story.
But, it is certainly something the DNC would do - given their history of making sure their preferred candidate gets the nod.

... and Trump, who lost to Biden

Anonymous wrote:Biden will drop out.

ICYMI: there’s risk involved when someone announces too soon. He’s being strategic by holding off for a while.

Also ICYMI: Biden has been meeting with Newsom. He’s the heir apparent. If the Dems are smart, they’ll clean up CA so Newsom can run on a success story. Now is the time to throw federal dollars at ending homelessness and investing in alternatives to crime efforts.

Are you suggesting that the Dems purposely hold back improving and helping Californians unless/until Newsom is the most likely nominee????

Anonymous wrote:I think they are going to make a switch closer to election day. I've believed this for a long time, because it went from "he won't run again" to inexplicably, him running again.

I think the idea is that Trump does worse when he's up against a relative unknown. So, we know both Biden and Trump, and that's good for Trump. The reason he beat Hillary is because we knew Hillary and she was strongly disliked. Biden is also strongly disliked, and this is all great for Trump. But, you replace Biden with someone that people have only vague familiarity with. And that's bad for Trump. People are more likely to go for the unknown.

I thought Biden won in 2020 because he WAS a safe, known commodity.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Creep.

https://twitter.com/ImMeme0/status/1726362701683708009

There’s something very wrong with this man and I’m tired of being emotionally blackmailed into pretending otherwise. If democracy won’t survive admitting that Biden is probably a predator, esp based on what his own DAUGHTER wrote in her diary, then democracy never had any hope.

Haha! Listen, we know you love fake news: Pizza Gate