Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Gina Baum and I differ politically, but I admire her ability to get her feet wet and do the work. She is not afraid to challenge the status quo or speak up. She can also work with people who have different opinions, ideas, beliefs than her. Here is why I'm voting for Gina over Tim Beaty: Gina might differ from me, but she understands how city council and the city works. She knows how ACPS works. She might need to learn about the school board but she's politically savvy.
Gina Baum has been at the school board meetings advocating for teachers. Asking to fill staff vacancies for core classes. Asking to compensate teachers and restore steps. Asking for services for students with disabilities. Suggesting we use rec spaces during the pandemic to space our students and accommodate more students and use outdoor rec and Cory spaces for outdoor learning and outdoor lunch to mitigate COVID, which the former superintendent wouldn't even entertain.
Her son attends ACHS. She's an ACPS parent.
Tim Beaty seems like a nice guy. But he is a professional union organizer who is retired with very lose ties to Alexandria. He tutors at and is a sub. For what, to be the handpicked choice of Alexandria Dems? This is a nonpartisan race!
Before, the School Board was trying to get two former SB members to run. Neither did. So Alexandria Dems formally organized to get signatures for at their meeting on December. They didn't provide Ms. Baum the same and he easily collected signatures to get on the ballot. Mind you, this is a nonpartisan election.
Never have I heard from this guy at any school board meeting or in any parent group. I never saw him involved in any PTA or PTAC or grassroots groups. I don't know him from volunteering in the community and I'm involved in a lot of volunteer work that seems like I'd know him.
It does not appear he knows much about our public schools. He has all the right taking points. But he's focused solely on one issue, collective bargaining in a right to work state. ACPS could restore steps for the teachers if they cut their budget elsewhere or asked the city for money. With Jackson and Gaskins both running for mayor, who is going to say "no" to supporting teachers?
Please stop giving me reasons to vote for this guy. If he's never been involved with the do-nothing PTAs and ACPS loving PTAC (who stay silent unless it's to praise ACPS) then all the better!
I don't think Gina is a PTA or PTAC person. She was involved with the city parks and recreation committee and served for several years on parks and rec and the waterfront commission. If you want the status quo, vote for Tim Beaty. It seems like the school board members and ADC got him to run so that a current parent would not win. Seems like a nice guy but he is not in touch with the issues that matter, like academic achievement, CIP budget, teacher vacancies, and the staffing crisis. Gina's student is in my son's class and we have experienced first-hand teachers leaving or having core classes without teachers that are required for graduation. Some of the courses my son is in are AP and he is teaching himself online! I'm a lifelong Democrat but I feel like there are people who are apologists for everything. ACPS should be so much better. We need to pay our teachers better, which both candidates support which is my #1 issue. But academics are really important to me and I am not hearing anything but collective bargaining from the other candidate. He's an expert on that and that is wonderful, but there is more than just CB in ACPS right now. I'm terrified all the teachers will walk and there will be a worse staffing crisis.
That being said, sometimes Gina inserts her foot in her mouth. She isn't always the most savvy about how to behave online. But it is better than the other candidate who isn't responding to parents and teachers online. Tim Beaty doesn't have a website and his social media is his personal website, which I think is super unprofessional. You should not co-mingle your professional work as an elected official and your private life online. I also think it's unfair for people to endorse candidates for early voting before any debates. How can Rief and Greene endorse Beaty when he has absolutely no information about his platform, other than collective bargaining online?
His article for ACHS made it seem like he's unclear about the issues.