Anonymous wrote:Sorry in the Evanston PP and just saw you’re in Mount Prospect, sorry I agree that’s pretty dull. I honestly think Arlington Heights would be better, it has a nice downtown. Park Ridge has a great quasi-urban center with public transit. Wilmette, if you can afford it, is fantastic. If not, come join us in Evanston lol, I spent the morning with my kids at the beach today. And I know all of my neighbors even though I’ve only lived here 2 years. Tons of little kids everywhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chicago?
I’d move in a heartbeat. We had moved to a more suburban part of NW dc and hated it. Moved back to the city and life is easy again. We walk everywhere and now that my kids are getting older, they have so much independence.
One suggestion would be to keep your house and rent it out. Then you’d still keep your mortgage and keep building equity. Otherwise you’ll pay so many transactional fees to sell and then would pay capital gains.
Yes, Chicago. I thought about trying to rent our house, but it's so outdated I'm not sure how that would pan out. Everything is in good working condition and there's no gross carpeting or anything, but the kitchen is from the 70s and the bathrooms are from the 90s.
An outdated house is perfect for renting. Renters can be really rough on a house.
Anonymous wrote:Op sitting here reading every response and literally tearing up. I hate it here so much. Thanks to all the Chicagoans for chiming in.
Anonymous wrote:Definitely rent out your current home. People can't afford to buy a house right now due to interest rates and since it's not newly remodeled. It won't matter if the tenants are a little bit rough and you need to change things to move back in in a year or two. Or fix it up and sell it at some point down the road?.
I would move in a heartbeat and the size wouldn't matter if one of us worked outside of the apartment, but I don't know if my husband and I could be together all day every day in under a thousand square feet. Be a relationship could be very different than ours. I love him but my goodness I need some breathing room.
Is he on board with this? Because it might be kind of hard to rent in the winter, so you may need to carry a mortgage for a while.... Might not be the worst thing while you move to the city and see how it goes..... If you don't like it, move back before spring
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chicago?
I’d move in a heartbeat. We had moved to a more suburban part of NW dc and hated it. Moved back to the city and life is easy again. We walk everywhere and now that my kids are getting older, they have so much independence.
One suggestion would be to keep your house and rent it out. Then you’d still keep your mortgage and keep building equity. Otherwise you’ll pay so many transactional fees to sell and then would pay capital gains.
Yes, Chicago. I thought about trying to rent our house, but it's so outdated I'm not sure how that would pan out. Everything is in good working condition and there's no gross carpeting or anything, but the kitchen is from the 70s and the bathrooms are from the 90s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op sitting here reading every response and literally tearing up. I hate it here so much. Thanks to all the Chicagoans for chiming in.
honestly, this doesn't look that bad:
https://www.mountprospect.org/community/about-mount-prospect
your reaction suggests that you have some other issues going on. i say that as life-long (50 years old now) city person, and a psychologist. it's ok to move to a place that suits you better, and not all places are the same. but moving 20 miles is unlikely to be a major fix for anything.
Anonymous wrote:Op sitting here reading every response and literally tearing up. I hate it here so much. Thanks to all the Chicagoans for chiming in.