Anonymous wrote:Three kids is totally manageable. You're overthinking this.
Anonymous wrote:I find taking care of all 3 of my kids at once way more less fun than 2 at a time. They're currently 2 / 4 / 6yos and their needs are just too different. The 2yo needs close watching out of the house which upsets the 4 and 6yos that I can't play with them (or focus on the museum activity or whatever) the way they want. Or i'll try to play games with them at the playground and the 2yo will start sobbing that I'm moving too fast and he can't keep up with us.
my point isn't that kids need to be parented this way. my point is that its the part of parenting i enjoy and its made it much more difficult. same with things like reading to each kid at bedtime and giving them their own special 1:1 time or doing a project thats their interests and skill. all of it is so much harder. when you have 3 your job increasingly becomes manager of their needs verus able to have fun with them. think about what type of parenting you enjoy and how it would be impacted by having another kid in another stage to take care of.
Anonymous wrote:I find taking care of all 3 of my kids at once way more less fun than 2 at a time. They're currently 2 / 4 / 6yos and their needs are just too different. The 2yo needs close watching out of the house which upsets the 4 and 6yos that I can't play with them (or focus on the museum activity or whatever) the way they want. Or i'll try to play games with them at the playground and the 2yo will start sobbing that I'm moving too fast and he can't keep up with us.
my point isn't that kids need to be parented this way. my point is that its the part of parenting i enjoy and its made it much more difficult. same with things like reading to each kid at bedtime and giving them their own special 1:1 time or doing a project thats their interests and skill. all of it is so much harder. when you have 3 your job increasingly becomes manager of their needs verus able to have fun with them. think about what type of parenting you enjoy and how it would be impacted by having another kid in another stage to take care of.
Anonymous wrote:Why can’t you work from home full time with 3 kids and a nanny? You may need to send the older ones to part day preschool so they’re not tethered to the newborn’s nap schedule but it would be fine. Or space yours out (that’s what we did). DC 1 and 2 were 5 and 7 when #3 came along so we just needed a nanny to watch 1 baby during school hours pretty much.
Also, your DH should watch the kids so you have time to yourself. That isn’t a negotiation. That is being a good partner. He isn’t babysitting either, it’s called parenting.
Anonymous wrote:The issue will be when the kids get older- Once the youngest is in elementary school and all the kids have different activities in the afternoons and on weekends it gets more complicated. I stay at home, and we had to hire an afternoon driver/nanny to help me juggle all the afternoon things while DH works. One day a week he stops work early to help and the nanny is off that day. Ages 5-16, when kids have lots of activities and stay up later at night, and before they have can drive themselves and be more independent, that is when it is difficult. And all the appointments!
Anonymous wrote:OP again. To clarify, I call it babysitting, not DH. I call it babysitting when I have both kids to myself too. DH does get most of the wake-ups now. But kids don't always go back to sleep when you want them to, so sometimes, there's a child in our bed climbing over us as we're trying to sleep at 6am.
DH makes under $200k, as do I. So while that's enough to pay for a $200 a month gym membership with childcare, it's not enough to eat takeout or go to brunch with other SAHMs every day. I know the negotiating sounds odd, but it's my attempt at fulfilling DH's dream while curing my own baby fever and maintaining a manageable life.
Yeah, I think I just need a different solution to getting over baby fever.