Anonymous wrote:As an Indian American I am terribly ashamed that people like Hailey and Vivek are representing our community, maybe I am cynical and all politicians are like this.

Maybe be a little ashamed of Vivek. Not Indian, but spent a long time there. And in California. Vivek has the spoiled Indian boy syndrome. He's arrogant He has no empathy. He's rude. He talks over people. He has no manners. He thinks far too highly of himself. But I think Haley is doing very well. Confident. Sharp. Intelligent. Quick. And self-aware. Can read a room and what's appropriate. Not a republican, but I like her.

Anonymous wrote:Vivek is insane where foreign policy is concerned.

And they are saying the pentagon budget isn't big enough. It is 800 billion dollars. WTF

Vivek is insane on pretty much everything. Really? Have Joe Rogan and Elon Musk run the debates and ask questions? Sure, have all of the candidates smoke weed and talk about dumb conspiracy theories.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The moderators did a great job maintaining control/decorum!

Except they did a lousy/non-existent joob of fact checking or calling out the lying.

Can they really do that without appearing biased!

Ah yes facts are biased now, I forgot.

They would have to decide when to interject, on the fly. Very hard to do.

Yet generations of journalists were able to do that until a couple of cycles ago.

Anonymous wrote:Haley is so damn reasonable .

Are you sure she is a Republican?

She and maybe Christie at times are clearly the only people on that stage that can articulate a case for being considered for POTUS.

Listening to Tim Scott on CNN discuss his enthusiasm for war with Iran.

My god, what a moron.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The moderators did a great job maintaining control/decorum!

Except they did a lousy/non-existent joob of fact checking or calling out the lying.

Can they really do that without appearing biased!

Ah yes facts are biased now, I forgot.

They would have to decide when to interject, on the fly. Very hard to do.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Finally! A Republican says that if you are pro-life, it has to cover the whole life, not just in the womb.

Points to Chris Christie for highlighting the party’s hypocrisy on this point. (Another obstacle to MAGAS supporting him!)

I have long wanted a journalist to confront so-called “right to lifers” to reveal their stance on the death penalty!!

You do know that the death penalty... is for violent criminals, right? Wow.

Violent criminals…who are alive.

So, if you are PRO-LIFE..,

Anonymous wrote:Wait, they all want to ban TikTok?

I thought they didn't want government interfering with platforms.

They want little government, big dictator.

Anonymous wrote:As an Indian American I am terribly ashamed that people like Hailey and Vivek are representing our community, maybe I am cynical and all politicians are like this.

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Finally! A Republican says that if you are pro-life, it has to cover the whole life, not just in the womb.

Points to Chris Christie for highlighting the party’s hypocrisy on this point. (Another obstacle to MAGAS supporting him!)

I have long wanted a journalist to confront so-called “right to lifers” to reveal their stance on the death penalty!!

You do know that the death penalty... is for violent criminals, right? Wow.

It also isn't a deterrent and is more expensive than just housing someone in prison for the rest of their life.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The moderators did a great job maintaining control/decorum!

Except they did a lousy/non-existent joob of fact checking or calling out the lying.

Can they really do that without appearing biased!

Ah yes facts are biased now, I forgot.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The moderators did a great job maintaining control/decorum!

Except they did a lousy/non-existent joob of fact checking or calling out the lying.

Can they really do that without appearing biased!

Anonymous wrote:Finally! A Republican says that if you are pro-life, it has to cover the whole life, not just in the womb.

Points to Chris Christie for highlighting the party’s hypocrisy on this point. (Another obstacle to MAGAS supporting him!)

I have long wanted a journalist to confront so-called “right to lifers” to reveal their stance on the death penalty!!

You do know that the death penalty... is for violent criminals, right? Wow.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Sounds like a good idea to me.

+1
Also, does "Angry Staffer" really think he's still relevant?

Anonymous wrote:The moderators did a great job maintaining control/decorum!

Except they did a lousy/non-existent joob of fact checking or calling out the lying.