Anonymous wrote:As other posters have said, know the difference between “hook” and “spike.”
Intense, quirky, longtime interest with big awards is a SPIKE.
Being a recruited athlete, development case, etc, is a HOOK.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ROTC for elite private schools where most of their students are wealthy with little or no interest in a military career.
Very underrated hook. I mean extremely underrated. Elite schools that choose to do ROTC - MIT, Princeton, Vanderbilt, Duke, Cornell, Berkeley, Georgetown - need to fill those spaces. And those are generally four year scholarships. The US military is dropping $300,000 on these kids. And they often go on to big time things - from consulting to IB to national security. And all the business and graduate schools love them. It's a big time hook.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Having a special talent isn’t a hook. It’s legacy, large donor, athletic recruit, urm, first Gen, and pell eligible
What about faculty kids?
Anonymous wrote:I consider full pay a hook.
Anonymous wrote:Be forewarned that you have about 6 hours before your thread turns into a gripe fest.
Anything that is seen as both uncommon and generally beneficial could be a hook. So being a great chess player is good but being a famous chess YouTube vlogger is probably better.
Anonymous wrote:ROTC for elite private schools where most of their students are wealthy with little or no interest in a military career.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:refugee from war-torn African nation while being one of the better students in the class
What about being a victim more generally?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Traditionally, in admissions world, hook refers to recruited athlete, URM, legacy, development case. Hook does not refer to interest.
OP, what you are referring to is sometimes referred to as a "spike" though there may be other terms as well.
This, op seems not to understand what a hook is.
Anonymous wrote:refugee from war-torn African nation while being one of the better students in the class