Anonymous wrote:I’m annoyed with Target as they don’t have any Xmas lights left today in my location. Also, they’re not selling any fake trees anymore? No decaf Earl Grey? Nothing that I need/like. Something is wrong here.
Anonymous wrote:What's really going on has nothing to do with theft. It's an excuse to hide the truth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know why so many of you are obsessed with pretending the criminal class doesn't exist.
They are too emotionally invested in their yard signs and terrified of being called racist if they acknowledge that crime occurs more frequently now than it did a few years ago. I would also point out that if your expectations and tolerances for behavior for the one group of people is different for another group of people - and the defining characteristic of those groups are race - then you are STILL a racist. Because being overly tolerant based on race, is also racism.
If you saw the report on the mentally challenged man who was found in a room in a Metro station, you will see that a fair jumper kept the gate open for the man. It was probably the nicest thing the little s**t ever did.
The city is putting in 8 foot tall fare gates at every station. Fare jumpers will be a thing of the past.
The new fare gates are nowhere near 8 feet and jumping the new ones is a daily occurrence at my metro station.
Its humanly impossible to jump them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know why so many of you are obsessed with pretending the criminal class doesn't exist.
They are too emotionally invested in their yard signs and terrified of being called racist if they acknowledge that crime occurs more frequently now than it did a few years ago. I would also point out that if your expectations and tolerances for behavior for the one group of people is different for another group of people - and the defining characteristic of those groups are race - then you are STILL a racist. Because being overly tolerant based on race, is also racism.
If you saw the report on the mentally challenged man who was found in a room in a Metro station, you will see that a fair jumper kept the gate open for the man. It was probably the nicest thing the little s**t ever did.
The city is putting in 8 foot tall fare gates at every station. Fare jumpers will be a thing of the past.
The new fare gates are nowhere near 8 feet and jumping the new ones is a daily occurrence at my metro station.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's really going on has nothing to do with theft. It's an excuse to hide the truth.
Americans love online shopping! Brick and mortar is dying so they blame theft to close stores.
Anonymous wrote:What's really going on has nothing to do with theft. It's an excuse to hide the truth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know why so many of you are obsessed with pretending the criminal class doesn't exist.
They are too emotionally invested in their yard signs and terrified of being called racist if they acknowledge that crime occurs more frequently now than it did a few years ago. I would also point out that if your expectations and tolerances for behavior for the one group of people is different for another group of people - and the defining characteristic of those groups are race - then you are STILL a racist. Because being overly tolerant based on race, is also racism.
If you saw the report on the mentally challenged man who was found in a room in a Metro station, you will see that a fair jumper kept the gate open for the man. It was probably the nicest thing the little s**t ever did.
The city is putting in 8 foot tall fare gates at every station. Fare jumpers will be a thing of the past.
Anonymous wrote:It's interesting to me because I worked in consulting and one of the clients (a large retailer) had expensive real estate and needed to get out of long term leases -- the crime angle was the strongest one considering all of the cost-benefit around shutting down the stores.
When we looked at the data in detail, shrink wasn't necessarily an issue until the company began aggressively staffing loss prevention in the stores they wanted to close (like 15 to 20 times as much was spent on loss prevention compared to the very small amount spent in stores with cheaper leases). Then, the data existed so they could get out of the leases, close the stores and move their business elsewhere cheaper. Rinse and repeat.
What's interesting is the stores actually made money and were net-net profitable. But the contribution to EBITA didn't support keeping them on the books.
My guess, like most things, is that the money is the reason behind this. Not crime or shoplifting, but obviously focusing on shrink you are going to find it.