Anonymous wrote:Walk the dog twice a day!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are you trying to hit 10,000? That number has been debunked as a health goal.
8,000 is the minimum but 10k is better.
"Particularly, a recent meta-analysis showed decreasing mortality risks with an increasing number of daily steps until 6000 to 8000 steps are reached for adults older than 60 years and at 8000 to 10 000 steps per day for those younger than 60 years."
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2802810#:~:text=Particularly%2C%20a%20recent%20meta%2Danalysis,those%20younger%20than%2060%20years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would prioritized 30 minutes or cardio and not worry about the number of steps.
30 minutes isn’t enough. This is why most of you do need a step tracker to keep you honest. You think “putzing” or 30 minutes of cardio makes you active. It doesn’t.
But it actually does mean you're active. It's called NEAT (non-exercise activity thermogenesis). Not all of your activity has to be purposeful i.e., running, cardio class. Those who are metabolically healthy live a life where they are literally "putzing around" - gardening, cleaning the house, taking the stairs, leisurely walk to the corner coffee shop.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would prioritized 30 minutes or cardio and not worry about the number of steps.
30 minutes isn’t enough. This is why most of you do need a step tracker to keep you honest. You think “putzing” or 30 minutes of cardio makes you active. It doesn’t.