Anonymous wrote:Who's the dumb one sending their kid to a public school?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That book is very gay. Surprised they allow it.
Why are you here? Don't you have a book to burn somewhere?
Anonymous wrote:I read in in tenth grade as well. It's not hard to read, but there's still plenty to unpack there if you've got a good teacher. My 12th grade AP English Lit class read an actual children's picture book (The Little Prince, I think this is pretty common) and the teacher taught it really well. I've got a friend from high school who still talks about it.
Once a student can read a book, I don't see there being any kind of upper age where it stops making sense to teach it, if it's a good book. My husband wrote in college about the Wind in the Willows, a book we also read to our six year old. It's about what you do with it, not what age is "right."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lord of the Flies was assigned in 6th grade in PA. Also, 1984. And, City of Ember, etc. They all have dark themes.
It's not about the darkness in my opinion, but more the abstractions around how societies form and collapse, how power dynamics emerge. 6th graders can read these Lord of the Flies and 1984--they don't have very high lexile levels-- but they wouldn't get as much out of them as you would once you can think more abstractly and complexly about the world around you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, give your kid a copy of AARP Magazine. It is recommended for ages 55 and up, so will be a stretch challenge for your genius child.
Funniest post ive read here in a while.
Very sad to see tiger parenting reach the level where one would brag about their elementary school child reading Lord of the Flies, Heart of Darkness, and other books with dark depressing themes. Oh but the books have big words! If your child is verbally gifted, let them do the NY Times crossword or read Anne of Green Gables.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Books aren't more appropriate or intellectually stimulating just because the author has been dead longer.
You're beingna cargo cultist obsessing over name brands instead of content.
We noticed that it IS important to have students read books from a variety of eras and genres so they build vocab, context, some history, and different literature styles.
Our kids middle school age then reading all new justice themed books from first copyright 2019+ and the diction is not expansive, style is quite repetitive (ie no style), and overused dialog which is even more informal, repetitive wording.
In other words not challenging whatsoever. But it’s all about the theme.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This book is for ages 13 and up. I think I read it around 5th grade. By Sophmore year in HS we were reading Ethan Fromme and the Scarlet Letter. Maybe Grapes of Wrath. My kid in a DC metro area public HS is reading Lord of the Flies for English Class. Seriously? Talk about dumbing it down to the lowest common denominator!
The book is a classic and good to read during k-12.
What matters is the class discussions, essay writing and dissection of then books genre, style, tone, characters, themes, etc.
Frankly it’s one of those books one should reread every 10 years.
Unf I had to read Faust in HS and college. I understand that OP is concerned that the book is not “difficult enough,” but see above.
Walden pond, Moby dick, etc were such slogs to read.
Anonymous wrote:Books aren't more appropriate or intellectually stimulating just because the author has been dead longer.
You're beingna cargo cultist obsessing over name brands instead of content.
Anonymous wrote:You were 13 in 5th grade? That explains a lot.
Anonymous wrote:This book is for ages 13 and up. I think I read it around 5th grade. By Sophmore year in HS we were reading Ethan Fromme and the Scarlet Letter. Maybe Grapes of Wrath. My kid in a DC metro area public HS is reading Lord of the Flies for English Class. Seriously? Talk about dumbing it down to the lowest common denominator!
+1 I think this book would be a great choice to switch out, because it totally misses the reality that humans survived through cooperationAnonymous wrote:While your DC is reading Lord of the Flies, which is fictional, he should also read the true story of some boys who were stranded together on a deserted island and how they cooperated rather than fought.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tongan_castaways
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-21/rutger-bregman-lord-of-the-flies-human-nature/12263980
Anonymous wrote:While your DC is reading Lord of the Flies, which is fictional, he should also read the true story of some boys who were stranded together on a deserted island and how they cooperated rather than fought.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tongan_castaways
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-21/rutger-bregman-lord-of-the-flies-human-nature/12263980