Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Job hopping IS the new normal. Younger people recognize that companies won’t look out for them and fire them without notice if needed so they don’t feel any loyalty. I hopped around a bit while finding my footing after college (during the recession). It took a few jobs to find out what I really wanted to do and who I wanted to work for. I’d give them a chance but treat them well and make sure pay stays competitive otherwise they might leave after a year. I’d say they will likely stay longer in their next position because they worry about their resume and short tenures so it might work out.
That's fine. But you'll only get offers from use and dispose employers. The employers that are worth working for, that offer good benefits, that give good raises, are going to skip the job hoppers. Companies like that look for people with a record of staying at least long enough to both be productive and learn something. I look at a resume like that and wonder how much did the person learn about how to actually work post-college. It takes nearly a year to really learn how to do some of the tasks or skills that are not taught in college. So, for me and my company, whether it is the new normal or not, we are not hiring candidates like that. So, job hopping will cut down on the number of job opportunities that you'll have and you'll mostly get the job opportunities from places that aren't worth staying.
But if it works for you, great. I have plenty of decent candidates that have reliable work records to choose from. Different strokes (and employers) for everyone.
Anonymous wrote:But the people responding that job hopping is normal or to be expected in todays corporate climate are missing the point.
If you’re an employer and have the choice between someone who evidences a clear pattern of job hopping and one who doesn’t, the employer should pick the one who doesn’t.
It may be reasonable to job hop, but it doesn’t change the fact that, for most employers, that employee is likely worthless.
Anonymous wrote:His/her timeline is: Finished MBA in 2020, worked job #1 for 9 months, #2 for 6 months, #3 for 15 months, and has been at the current for 6 months.
Justifications seem legit & there is clear career growth. Gave great technical answers to questions & seems like it would be a good fit.
Excuse for leaving job 1: Graduated during the pandemic and took the job that was available in an industry that was not.
Excuse for leaving job 2: Was recruited from job 1 on a contract bases. 6 Months.
Excuse for leaving job 3: Was recruited for job 4 to lead a bigger division, has good references from this position. Position i'm hiring for is in the same industry.
Excuse for leaving job 4: Said 'could stick with this position for years. Good pay, good boss, full time work from home, just the work is unfulfilling and industry isn't ideal.
I want to take the risk here. We urgently need someone on board, but my panel is old school and thinks we go with someone else.
Anonymous wrote:Job hopping IS the new normal. Younger people recognize that companies won’t look out for them and fire them without notice if needed so they don’t feel any loyalty. I hopped around a bit while finding my footing after college (during the recession). It took a few jobs to find out what I really wanted to do and who I wanted to work for. I’d give them a chance but treat them well and make sure pay stays competitive otherwise they might leave after a year. I’d say they will likely stay longer in their next position because they worry about their resume and short tenures so it might work out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Job hopping IS the new normal. Younger people recognize that companies won’t look out for them and fire them without notice if needed so they don’t feel any loyalty. I hopped around a bit while finding my footing after college (during the recession). It took a few jobs to find out what I really wanted to do and who I wanted to work for. I’d give them a chance but treat them well and make sure pay stays competitive otherwise they might leave after a year. I’d say they will likely stay longer in their next position because they worry about their resume and short tenures so it might work out.
Agree. But even if you give them opportunities and competitive pay this person will probably tell you in six months that they want a promotion and then leave if they don’t get it by the one year mark. If they are Gen Z they will probably do this while mostly WFH, taking long vacations, asking for the company to fly them across the US for a conference that happens to be in the same location and date as their sister’s wedding, working one hour a day when they have a cold (instead of just taking a sick day…which they will have already used on mental health days where they hike and do laundry) and acting like they are heroic…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me guess-she’s a super attractive young woman in a primarily make dominated field?
Being a woman in finance or tech is generally hard, attractive or not.
This person has an MBA, so she is on the deal making/sales side of any business, so being attractive is a definite plus and many more women participate.
Deal making has combative culture, I would say most women are not attuned to this type of style.
She’s hired to distract the alpha males in negotiations.
This is not a thing. You’re a misogynistic freak.
Looks the Vc photos, compare hotness of women to men.
https://www.businessinsider.com/this-20-year-old-vcs-party-gave-us-an-inside-look-at-stanfords-startup-culture-2012-3
This women was working VC at 19, let’s be real.
https://patch.com/california/menlopark-atherton/stanford-student-becomes-youngest-venture-capitalist
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me guess-she’s a super attractive young woman in a primarily make dominated field?
Being a woman in finance or tech is generally hard, attractive or not.
This person has an MBA, so she is on the deal making/sales side of any business, so being attractive is a definite plus and many more women participate.
Deal making has combative culture, I would say most women are not attuned to this type of style.
She’s hired to distract the alpha males in negotiations.
This is not a thing. You’re a misogynistic freak.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me guess-she’s a super attractive young woman in a primarily make dominated field?
Being a woman in finance or tech is generally hard, attractive or not.
This person has an MBA, so she is on the deal making/sales side of any business, so being attractive is a definite plus and many more women participate.
Deal making has combative culture, I would say most women are not attuned to this type of style.
She’s hired to distract the alpha males in negotiations.
This is not a thing. You’re a misogynistic freak.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me guess-she’s a super attractive young woman in a primarily make dominated field?
Being a woman in finance or tech is generally hard, attractive or not.
This person has an MBA, so she is on the deal making/sales side of any business, so being attractive is a definite plus and many more women participate.
Deal making has combative culture, I would say most women are not attuned to this type of style.
She’s hired to distract the alpha males in negotiations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me guess-she’s a super attractive young woman in a primarily make dominated field?
Being a woman in finance or tech is generally hard, attractive or not.
This person has an MBA, so she is on the deal making/sales side of any business, so being attractive is a definite plus and many more women participate.
Deal making has combative culture, I would say most women are not attuned to this type of style.
Anonymous wrote:Job hopping IS the new normal. Younger people recognize that companies won’t look out for them and fire them without notice if needed so they don’t feel any loyalty. I hopped around a bit while finding my footing after college (during the recession). It took a few jobs to find out what I really wanted to do and who I wanted to work for. I’d give them a chance but treat them well and make sure pay stays competitive otherwise they might leave after a year. I’d say they will likely stay longer in their next position because they worry about their resume and short tenures so it might work out.