Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you really joke about Cornell if you didn't go to one of a handful of schools? It still looks bad then and most of the people here didn't...
Also, Cornell isn't the "worst" school in the Ivy League even if USNWR tried to tell everyone it was for so long (though not this year with their updated methodology).
Come on, admit it. It just is...
Actually, if you want to study CS, Cornell is ranked the highest of the Ivies. I think Princeton does reasonably well too but the others are frankly below UMD.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One can get an excellent education at any MCPS HS. Each has the same curriculum and the same pool of teaching talent. They all even have an adequately large high-achieving cohort. Sure, there are some differences in bulk test averages that correspond to an area's overall SES but you can do just as well in Calc BC at WJ as anywhere else.
Don't the best teachers want to work at the schools with the highest achieving students? Thus, your argument is off.
Anonymous wrote:Whitman is the best by far. The others are... meh.. (If you include Winston Churchill, then that is also a great W)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really hate to break to you all but the "W" schools are just big public schools with large class sizes and a lot of rich kids.
W school = wealthy and white(ish).
I see what you did here in Helping Cornell W (as in presidential candidate Cornell West) get the word out.Anonymous wrote:Is Walter Johnson the Cornell of the “W schools?”
Meaning, is it the least prestigious and some argue not even worthy of the “W School” title? Or is it excellent? I ask this because I have been hearing conflicting thoughts on this.
Anyone with direct experience with the school?
Anonymous wrote:OP if you're this transparent on an anonymous message board I can't imagine what you're like in real life.
Anonymous wrote:OP is Jen Baker's parting shot at DCUM!![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is Walter Johnson the Cornell of the “W schools?”
Meaning, is it the least prestigious and some argue not even worthy of the “W School” title? Or is it excellent? I ask this because I have been hearing conflicting thoughts on this.
Anyone with direct experience with the school?
That's silly, OP. Obviously Walter Johnson is the Dartmouth of the "W Schools." Or maybe the Penn of the "W Schools"?
Plus, where would the prestigiousness of these public MCPS high schools come from anyway? The prestige of having parents who reside in Bethesda or Potomac?
Isn’t WJ in Rockville or North Bethesda? Very different than Bethesda or Potomac.
Wootton is in Rockville. So what of it?
Yes, Wootton is unarguably in Rockville - within the boundaries of the incorporated municipality of Rockville. So unprestigious!
And Churchill starts with a C, not a W. Also unprestigious. I have never heard anybody refer to "Winston Churchill" High School the way everyone refers to "Walter Johnson" High School. Also, before Churchill was Churchill, it was Potomac High School, which starts with a P, not a W.
And Walter Johnson is in North Bethesda, according to the U.S. Census, although I personally think that south of 270 it's Bethesda, not North Bethesda. Also unprestigious!
So that just leaves Whitman, which is actually a Double W school (Walt Whitman), but I don't know why a school named after a poet would be more prestigious than a school named after a physicist, a pitcher, a pianist, a president, a prime minister, a patriot, a physician, or a plantation owner. Which, actually, why don't we refer to the P schools in MCPS? P for prestige, of course.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is Walter Johnson the Cornell of the “W schools?”
Meaning, is it the least prestigious and some argue not even worthy of the “W School” title? Or is it excellent? I ask this because I have been hearing conflicting thoughts on this.
Anyone with direct experience with the school?
One can get an excellent education at any MCPS HS. Each has the same curriculum and the same pool of teaching talent. They all even have an adequately large high-achieving cohort. Sure, there are some differences in bulk test averages that correspond to an area's overall SES but you can do just as well in Calc BC at WJ as anywhere else.
Don't the best teachers want to work at the schools with the highest achieving students? Thus, your argument is off.
Anonymous wrote:WJ is a little bit more diverse than the other W schools (not counting BCC the honorary W), a little bit less of a pressure cooker, yet still full of high-achieving kids.
I'm a WJ parent and from what I've observed WJ parents are probably not as hard-core as Whitman or Churchill parents. We chose the WJ catchment area for this very reason.
Anonymous wrote:OP has serious psychological problems.