Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is an athlete who just went through the recruiting process and looked at a lot of D3 SLACs. At many schools, the athlete/non-athlete divide was very apparent, which was something my kid was trying to avoid. Bowdoin was the school that, in my kid’s view, had a much more integrated student body with a lot of athlete/non-athlete crossover (esp compared to Williams & Amherst).
This post is spot-on correct.
Same is true at Bates. Very integrated student body. Only one dining hall for everybody. No separate dorms for athletes. And my DC who is there has athletic and non athletic friends.
“The demise of affirmative action poses an existential threat to a vibrant, diverse, and inclusive liberal arts institution,” Reyes said. “To lament this terrible event, and simultaneously to continue athletic admissions that preference rich white people, is racist.”
The motion was introduced by Professor of Economics Jessica Reyes
Anonymous wrote:At NESCAC schools it can make the school feel even smaller, for better or for worse. It’s a problem even at Ivies where there aren’t differentiated meal plans and there aren’t athletic scholarships. It also can create a school-within-a-school vibe that isn’t pleasant. A large proportion of the student body ends up being athletes because of the vast amount of varsity sports offered, and they tend to socialize together because of the time commitments of their sports. Each team gets multiple admits per year who are guaranteed admission outside of the regular admissions process. Even 2-3 of these “likelies” per team means that your class has hundreds of kids in it who were in their own, less rigorous admission process. Those students have dedicated workout facilities, their own access to things like weekend hot breakfast or extended dinner hours, special policies for missing academic obligations, and guess what? You’re paying the same tuition and room and board as them but get less. My then-freshman once showed up at early breakfast on a weekend and got screamed at by an assistant coach because the hot breakfast foods were only for game day athletes! It was the only place to eat early breakfast and he had no way of knowing that the hot line was athletes-only.
So it’s kind of sucky to be a NARP if athletes are pretty integrated into the student body and it’s a small school. The real winners are the ones who use their sport for admissions and then become a NARP!
Anonymous wrote:'Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only school that we felt had a strong divide (visible in the dining hall) was Dickenson. At my kid's overnight visit, the host confirmed it is pretty cliquey.
If this is a concern, pick a school that is not known for sports or Greek life. That suggests a more equal playing field, socially.
It seems possible though that fraternities/sororities offer an opportunity to be part of a tight knit social group for a student who isn't on a team.
NP. Wow, so the world is divided into sports team members and Greek members. Not.
Any decent college or university of any size, SLAC or not, is going to have ample clubs, volunteer organizations, religious organizations, political organizations, arts groups etc. etc. Students can form their own groups if they don't find one they want to join. Too many opportunities for the world to be merely "jocks or Greeks" if you want a "tight knit social group," PP. And maybe they'll even find, you know, friends who don't come pre-packaged by being in ANY group/team/club/house and they'll be tightly knit anyway, eh?
Anonymous wrote:'Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only school that we felt had a strong divide (visible in the dining hall) was Dickenson. At my kid's overnight visit, the host confirmed it is pretty cliquey.
If this is a concern, pick a school that is not known for sports or Greek life. That suggests a more equal playing field, socially.
It seems possible though that fraternities/sororities offer an opportunity to be part of a tight knit social group for a student who isn't on a team.
NP. Wow, so the world is divided into sports team members and Greek members. Not.
Any decent college or university of any size, SLAC or not, is going to have ample clubs, volunteer organizations, religious organizations, political organizations, arts groups etc. etc. Students can form their own groups if they don't find one they want to join. Too many opportunities for the world to be merely "jocks or Greeks" if you want a "tight knit social group," PP. And maybe they'll even find, you know, friends who don't come pre-packaged by being in ANY group/team/club/house and they'll be tightly knit anyway, eh?
'Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only school that we felt had a strong divide (visible in the dining hall) was Dickenson. At my kid's overnight visit, the host confirmed it is pretty cliquey.
If this is a concern, pick a school that is not known for sports or Greek life. That suggests a more equal playing field, socially.
It seems possible though that fraternities/sororities offer an opportunity to be part of a tight knit social group for a student who isn't on a team.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:kinda hate this term, and that it's used derogatorily to describe non-athletes. Schools which foster such strong athlete/non-athlete divides should reconsider what they're doing
Whether or not you like the term NARP, the divide is very rael at many--probably most--LACs/SLACs. Certainly the case at Middlebury & Amherst & Williams--although some experiences may be different.
It wasn't the case at my midwestern SLAC.
Meaningless without the name of the college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is an athlete who just went through the recruiting process and looked at a lot of D3 SLACs. At many schools, the athlete/non-athlete divide was very apparent, which was something my kid was trying to avoid. Bowdoin was the school that, in my kid’s view, had a much more integrated student body with a lot of athlete/non-athlete crossover (esp compared to Williams & Amherst).
This post is spot-on correct.
Anonymous wrote:I never heard of a NARP before but that describes my kid who is looking at SLACs.
Can we start naming names? Name SLACs that are good for NARPs and don't have the divide. Name SLACs that have the divide. Thanks!
Anonymous wrote:I never heard of a NARP before but that describes my kid who is looking at SLACs.
Can we start naming names? Name SLACs that are good for NARPs and don't have the divide. Name SLACs that have the divide. Thanks!