Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Take it and invest it. After investing for 20 years at 6% interest, your initial investment of $650,000 will have grown to $2,084,638 with literally ZERO outlay on your part. Meanwhile, that house in Reston will have property taxes, repairs, etc. and even if it's paid off will absolutely COST you money year over year.
Isn't her house paid off and she will make rental income? Your scenario assumes the house only carries costs and appreciate with inflation if at all. She can take rental income and invest it in the markets. She needs to calculate how much rental income she will net and compare with the performance of her market investments. She isn't likely to do better in the markets than she is already doing, because this assumes re-education and for her to change her strategies.
Another question to ask is whether she wants to pass the house on to her kids. She needs to do the numbers, that's the bottom line. Also, it is beneficial for her to sell and not pay cap gains tax on her appreciation now before it gets rolled over into a rental property. But then she gets to deduct expenses of rental maint. from her income as well as depreciation. Depending on her income bracket she may get tax breaks and invest the money she would have had to pay in taxes each year.
What you say (cash out, pay no tax and invest the whole 600+K in the markets that will continue growing steadily with a rather high rate of 6% and with no risk) sounds tempting and convincing, but I don't think counting on markets consistently returning this for the next 2 decades is realistic. You are looking at the past performance, but then the same rule has to apply to housing market where properties keep appreciating. Yet we don't believe this will continue and believe housing prices may actually drop or barely keep up with inflation. What makes you believe markets will keep rising in that scenario?
Anonymous wrote:Take it and invest it. After investing for 20 years at 6% interest, your initial investment of $650,000 will have grown to $2,084,638 with literally ZERO outlay on your part. Meanwhile, that house in Reston will have property taxes, repairs, etc. and even if it's paid off will absolutely COST you money year over year.
Anonymous wrote:Take it and invest it. After investing for 20 years at 6% interest, your initial investment of $650,000 will have grown to $2,084,638 with literally ZERO outlay on your part. Meanwhile, that house in Reston will have property taxes, repairs, etc. and even if it's paid off will absolutely COST you money year over year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First of all, it’s not wise to have half of your net worth tied up in such an illiquid investment. In the best of times, it takes months to liquidate a house, and if the market slows down, it could take years.
Also, make sure you look at all the tax implications of renting, including how depreciation recapture works. Also the impact of losing the capital gains tax exemption, if the house has appreciated since you purchased it.
FWIW, I inherited several rental properties in a hot real estate market and, after doing the math on all the expenses (maintenance, taxes, insurance, management fees, business license, etc), and then add in the loss of tax basis through depreciation, it didn’t pencil out as investment vs. the stock market. You can buy a CD now that has over 5% interest, and you don’t have to hassle with renters.
It looked to me like rental real estate is a good investment IF you are highly leveraged AND in a market that is appreciating, and could cover all of your expenses, including mortgage, with the rent. That worked much better when you could get a sub 3% interest rate.
A CD has a limit on how much you can invest. If her house is paid off she will be way over FDIC ins limits and will have to maintain multiple accounts in multiple institutions and roll them over when they mature, and they may not mature into high rate environment years later. Rates for high yield saving accts also fluctuate. If she buys long term CD her money isn't liquid either, in fact if she needs it, she will have to wait many months to get access just the same as if she puts RE for sale. Yes, it's a good idea if you don't have hundreds of thousands to invest and you really do not need this money. It's one of the diversification vehicles if you invest elsewhere too. But it's not necessarily *better* in an of itself
Some misconceptions here. As an executor, I had millions in estate cash (from the sale of rental property, FWIW) that had to be invested in FDIC insured vehicles, and CDs were the easiest way to do this. My bank handled buying and holding multiple CDs from different banks, each under the FDIC limit. I just had to be careful not to buy from the banks where the estate already had accounts. Also, CDs can also be sold before they mature.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First of all, it’s not wise to have half of your net worth tied up in such an illiquid investment. In the best of times, it takes months to liquidate a house, and if the market slows down, it could take years.
Also, make sure you look at all the tax implications of renting, including how depreciation recapture works. Also the impact of losing the capital gains tax exemption, if the house has appreciated since you purchased it.
FWIW, I inherited several rental properties in a hot real estate market and, after doing the math on all the expenses (maintenance, taxes, insurance, management fees, business license, etc), and then add in the loss of tax basis through depreciation, it didn’t pencil out as investment vs. the stock market. You can buy a CD now that has over 5% interest, and you don’t have to hassle with renters.
It looked to me like rental real estate is a good investment IF you are highly leveraged AND in a market that is appreciating, and could cover all of your expenses, including mortgage, with the rent. That worked much better when you could get a sub 3% interest rate.
A CD has a limit on how much you can invest. If her house is paid off she will be way over FDIC ins limits and will have to maintain multiple accounts in multiple institutions and roll them over when they mature, and they may not mature into high rate environment years later. Rates for high yield saving accts also fluctuate. If she buys long term CD her money isn't liquid either, in fact if she needs it, she will have to wait many months to get access just the same as if she puts RE for sale. Yes, it's a good idea if you don't have hundreds of thousands to invest and you really do not need this money. It's one of the diversification vehicles if you invest elsewhere too. But it's not necessarily *better* in an of itself
Anonymous wrote:Sell it before you lose your capital gains exclusion.
Anonymous wrote:No you should not rent it bc you are emotionally attached to it and will view every single action by a renter as a personal attack on you and you will not be able to comprehend the concept of “normal wear and tear” .
You will be the kind of landlord who would go on Judge Judy and claim the renters “destroyed “ the place and then lose and then be outraged.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I no longer live in VA but still own my SFH (in Reston) worth about 650K. The house is fully paid off, but it needs some work.
It’s been sitting for almost six months now since I moved away. I thought I was going to sell, but I just can’t bring myself to list it. Now I’m considering renting it out.
We’re not extremely wealthy and this house is about half of our total net worth.
Should we sell this house or rent it out? Were currently on the west coast and if we moved back to Reston it wouldn’t be for 15-20 years. This decision has me paralyzed! Please advise.
I was a landlord for many years. It was OK when I lived near my rental property. But after moving a mere 20 miles away, it turned into a huge hassle.
Sell NOW while you can take advantage of the right to protect your capital gains on the property from taxation. If you wait too long, you may face a hefty tax. This is what happened to me, and it was a foolish mistake.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I no longer live in VA but still own my SFH (in Reston) worth about 650K. The house is fully paid off, but it needs some work.
It’s been sitting for almost six months now since I moved away. I thought I was going to sell, but I just can’t bring myself to list it. Now I’m considering renting it out.
We’re not extremely wealthy and this house is about half of our total net worth.
Should we sell this house or rent it out? Were currently on the west coast and if we moved back to Reston it wouldn’t be for 15-20 years. This decision has me paralyzed! Please advise.
I was a landlord for many years. It was OK when I lived near my rental property. But after moving a mere 20 miles away, it turned into a huge hassle.
Sell NOW while you can take advantage of the right to protect your capital gains on the property from taxation. If you wait too long, you may face a hefty tax. This is what happened to me, and it was a foolish mistake.