Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting opinion piece (written by former police officer) about why it's crazy we let civilians buy AR-15s.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/05/opinions/guns-ar-15-uvalde-school-shooting-fanone/index.html

its a civilian firearm . Or can you show us which military uses the AR-15?

That’s irrelevant. As the article describes, an AR-15 bullet will pierce through a person, the wall behind them and a person standing behind that wall. They are extremely powerful and are not used (by normal people) for hunting. Why does the average Joe need that much power?

But 3006 is okay? It’s far more powerful. I have a Soviet rifle that the 7.62x54R round would blow limbs off people . You know nothing about firearms

I know they should be age 21 minimum to obtain, require a permit and training, and not be permitted to purchase in bulk. In addition, gun owners should be required to register (I mean, we do it for our constitutional right to vote, so we can do it for guns) and that we should not have any loophole that allows any gun purchase without a background check.

I know we make it too easy for straw purchases and trafficking in *certain* states.

I know all of that, do you?

then raise the voting age

One is not like the other. We limit other things like alcohol and renting a car, due to age, and risk.

The only thing voting age puts at risk is conservative power.

car rental companies set the age of who can rent cars .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting opinion piece (written by former police officer) about why it's crazy we let civilians buy AR-15s.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/05/opinions/guns-ar-15-uvalde-school-shooting-fanone/index.html

its a civilian firearm . Or can you show us which military uses the AR-15?

That’s irrelevant. As the article describes, an AR-15 bullet will pierce through a person, the wall behind them and a person standing behind that wall. They are extremely powerful and are not used (by normal people) for hunting. Why does the average Joe need that much power?

But 3006 is okay? It’s far more powerful. I have a Soviet rifle that the 7.62x54R round would blow limbs off people . You know nothing about firearms

I know they should be age 21 minimum to obtain, require a permit and training, and not be permitted to purchase in bulk. In addition, gun owners should be required to register (I mean, we do it for our constitutional right to vote, so we can do it for guns) and that we should not have any loophole that allows any gun purchase without a background check.

I know we make it too easy for straw purchases and trafficking in *certain* states.

I know all of that, do you?

then raise the voting age

One is not like the other. We limit other things like alcohol and renting a car, due to age, and risk.

The only thing voting age puts at risk is conservative power.

Anonymous wrote:A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
You can't take it away from us.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting opinion piece (written by former police officer) about why it's crazy we let civilians buy AR-15s.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/05/opinions/guns-ar-15-uvalde-school-shooting-fanone/index.html

its a civilian firearm . Or can you show us which military uses the AR-15?

That’s irrelevant. As the article describes, an AR-15 bullet will pierce through a person, the wall behind them and a person standing behind that wall. They are extremely powerful and are not used (by normal people) for hunting. Why does the average Joe need that much power?

But 3006 is okay? It’s far more powerful. I have a Soviet rifle that the 7.62x54R round would blow limbs off people . You know nothing about firearms

I know they should be age 21 minimum to obtain, require a permit and training, and not be permitted to purchase in bulk. In addition, gun owners should be required to register (I mean, we do it for our constitutional right to vote, so we can do it for guns) and that we should not have any loophole that allows any gun purchase without a background check.

I know we make it too easy for straw purchases and trafficking in *certain* states.

I know all of that, do you?

then raise the voting age

Anonymous wrote:A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
You can't take it away from us.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting opinion piece (written by former police officer) about why it's crazy we let civilians buy AR-15s.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/05/opinions/guns-ar-15-uvalde-school-shooting-fanone/index.html

its a civilian firearm . Or can you show us which military uses the AR-15?

That’s irrelevant. As the article describes, an AR-15 bullet will pierce through a person, the wall behind them and a person standing behind that wall. They are extremely powerful and are not used (by normal people) for hunting. Why does the average Joe need that much power?

But 3006 is okay? It’s far more powerful. I have a Soviet rifle that the 7.62x54R round would blow limbs off people . You know nothing about firearms

I know they should be age 21 minimum to obtain, require a permit and training, and not be permitted to purchase in bulk. In addition, gun owners should be required to register (I mean, we do it for our constitutional right to vote, so we can do it for guns) and that we should not have any loophole that allows any gun purchase without a background check.

I know we make it too easy for straw purchases and trafficking in *certain* states.

I know all of that, do you?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting opinion piece (written by former police officer) about why it's crazy we let civilians buy AR-15s.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/05/opinions/guns-ar-15-uvalde-school-shooting-fanone/index.html

its a civilian firearm . Or can you show us which military uses the AR-15?

That’s irrelevant. As the article describes, an AR-15 bullet will pierce through a person, the wall behind them and a person standing behind that wall. They are extremely powerful and are not used (by normal people) for hunting. Why does the average Joe need that much power?

But 3006 is okay? It’s far more powerful. I have a Soviet rifle that the 7.62x54R round would blow limbs off people . You know nothing about firearms

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Your typical deer rifle at .308 is way more powerful than a .223.

Literally the marine basic sniper rifle is very common to use for hunting.
You can buy some wicked assault rifles that fire .308 - you do not hear about them because as they are wickedly powerful they are expensive and so is the ammo for them.

Then make the purchasing age 21, not 18, for starters.
Require a background check for ammunition.
Little basic things that can be done.

Limit bulk gun sales which are a red flag for straw purchasing and trafficking, and more likely to occur in states without bulk limits.

No. It’s time to just take the guns and ammo away. No more compromise. There is no reason for this slaughter to continue.

It's a start that will help with some school shootings at least. The gun nuts won't let you strip them of their manhood so you have to start with little steps like was done with abortion.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Your typical deer rifle at .308 is way more powerful than a .223.

Literally the marine basic sniper rifle is very common to use for hunting.
You can buy some wicked assault rifles that fire .308 - you do not hear about them because as they are wickedly powerful they are expensive and so is the ammo for them.

Then make the purchasing age 21, not 18, for starters.
Require a background check for ammunition.
Little basic things that can be done.

Limit bulk gun sales which are a red flag for straw purchasing and trafficking, and more likely to occur in states without bulk limits.

No. It’s time to just take the guns and ammo away. No more compromise. There is no reason for this slaughter to continue.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Your typical deer rifle at .308 is way more powerful than a .223.

Literally the marine basic sniper rifle is very common to use for hunting.
You can buy some wicked assault rifles that fire .308 - you do not hear about them because as they are wickedly powerful they are expensive and so is the ammo for them.

Then make the purchasing age 21, not 18, for starters.
Require a background check for ammunition.
Little basic things that can be done.

Limit bulk gun sales which are a red flag for straw purchasing and trafficking, and more likely to occur in states without bulk limits.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most of the liberal arguments are based on emotion and talking points. They have zero understanding about firearms. I showed libs pictures of 3006, .308win and .223 next to each other and asked them which one would they ban. They all say 3006, and have no idea the smallest one, the .223 is the one the ar-15 uses

real question..do you wank it to your guns?

How simple of a human do you have to be to have an obsession with a weapon? Do you really have nothing better going on in your life?

I don't have a single friend who owns a gun. You know what we all own? Beautiful homes and large investment accounts so we can spend time with our family and insulate us from morons like you.

Anonymous wrote:Your typical deer rifle at .308 is way more powerful than a .223.

Literally the marine basic sniper rifle is very common to use for hunting.
You can buy some wicked assault rifles that fire .308 - you do not hear about them because as they are wickedly powerful they are expensive and so is the ammo for them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most of the liberal arguments are based on emotion and talking points. They have zero understanding about firearms. I showed libs pictures of 3006, .308win and .223 next to each other and asked them which one would they ban. They all say 3006, and have no idea the smallest one, the .223 is the one the ar-15 uses

real question..do you wank it to your guns?

How simple of a human do you have to be to have an obsession with a weapon? Do you really have nothing better going on in your life?

I don't have a single friend who owns a gun. You know what we all own? Beautiful homes and large investment accounts so we can spend time with our family and insulate us from morons like you.