Anonymous wrote:“Our existing troops don’t want your girl, but we have such a great program that you should gladly agree to form your own troop and run the entire thing just to create a slot for your daughter. You are plain lazy not to do so. By the way, when you form your own troop you will gladly spend months complying with our procedures and engaging in retail product sales to pay the salaries of our professionals.”
There is a big difference between this program
and business approach and that of other opportunities. Think carefully before you agree to do this. Narrow your focus to only that which is best for your daughter. Select an organization that will serve your family and not the other way around.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please start your own GS tropp, rather than join BSA. Let's take a look, shall we: they abuse boys and move molesters around the country, cover-up the assaults, and when about to go bankrupt, come up with an idea to allow girls (the 50% they've excluded for decades, and fortunately, spared from the abuse).
The GS troop is 100% leader dependant. Get a good one and you are golden - my daughter started as a daisy and ended as a caddette, earning her gold award. Why not be a part of the solution?
Totally agree. Plus all of the girl Boy Scouts I know say they’re sort of a second thought. I’m sure that’s not universal, but it’s the total opposite of what scouting should be.
It's tough if there's already a GS troop available but it's toxic. They won't let you start a new troop if there's space available in a local one. So you are stuck with traveling to find a new troop (so all the friends your kid makes aren't local, not to mention the added time involved), or you go to a local Boy Scout troop that welcomes girls.
Ask me how I know!
Absolutely not true. If you have two leaders, a money manager and at least 6 girls you can start a new troop. You're just lazy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please start your own GS tropp, rather than join BSA. Let's take a look, shall we: they abuse boys and move molesters around the country, cover-up the assaults, and when about to go bankrupt, come up with an idea to allow girls (the 50% they've excluded for decades, and fortunately, spared from the abuse).
The GS troop is 100% leader dependant. Get a good one and you are golden - my daughter started as a daisy and ended as a caddette, earning her gold award. Why not be a part of the solution?
Totally agree. Plus all of the girl Boy Scouts I know say they’re sort of a second thought. I’m sure that’s not universal, but it’s the total opposite of what scouting should be.
It's tough if there's already a GS troop available but it's toxic. They won't let you start a new troop if there's space available in a local one. So you are stuck with traveling to find a new troop (so all the friends your kid makes aren't local, not to mention the added time involved), or you go to a local Boy Scout troop that welcomes girls.
Ask me how I know!
Anonymous wrote:Long time Scoutmaster of a Scouts BSA all-girl Troop in the District here. Beginning our fifth year of program, we have had bunches of young women experience very positive outdoor adventures and program with us and with the local Cub Scouts organizations in the District that feed their members to us. I don't know much about GSUSA, but what I do know from years of experience is that the existing Scouts BSA program works splendidly for girls. The BSA program is standardized, meaning that anyone who joins one of our groups will indeed experience a set number of experiences -- rather than whatever is decided by troop leadership. This means that everyone goes outside, camps, and engages in rigorous forward-looking activities. You will know what you are getting when you associate with a BSA group. I think it is great to have many youth service organizations to choose from, but Scouts BSA, Cub Scouts, Venturers and Sea Scouts (all BSA programs available in the DMV) work very well for females. No organization has a perfect history, and BSA has had major warts. However, the going-forward vision of BSA and the opportunity it offers girls and boys is indeed brilliant. I invite your family to consider BSA programming and compare what is available to other fine offerings and choose what is best for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The US was, until recently, one of only 13 nations that had single-gender scouting out of 216 nations with scouting programs. Just an interesting fact, but one that suggests the BSA change was a good one.
You know why that is, right? BSA did not want to band with the Girl Scouts (as had been done in the UK), because James West thought Scouting activities weren't appropriate for girls, forcing the creation of Girl Scouts as a separate organization. We should remember that many organizations like the Girl Scouts exist due to long-standing discrimination. When the larger, generally more powerful organizations (like PWIs) finally see the light and make steps to eliminate their discrimination, that does not mean we ignore their discrimination or immediately embrace them now that we're finally good enough for them.
While Boy Scouts finally broadening their views is a long time coming, it is ... interesting, shall we say? that Boy Scouts saw the light when they lost the influx of money from the Mormon church and needed to start looking elsewhere in order to keep their coffers full.
Bot just this, but the bone-deep, take-it-to-the-Supreme- Court commitment to LGBT discrimination while Girl Scouts was admitting trans kids is just conveniently handwaved away by parents who don't want to go to the trouble of actually volunteering in their kid's GSA troop. "They need money now, of course they'll stop discriminating it makes sense" isn't a reason to look the other way, but I guess any cover works if you never really cared.
I do think this is somewhat troubling, and also I am a little bothered by the fact that BSA has not changed anything with the admission of girls -- it's still exactly the same program, which I guess is fine if that's what you want, but also strikes me as a little bit like telling girls they are welcome so long as they conform exactly to what was set up by a bunch of men over the past 100 years. Girl Scouts, on the other hand, is very much girl driven (and women-led), and comes from that perspective. So the BSA inclusion seems to be more the old school vision of inclusion (you can join but don't expect us to change) rather than the newer model of inclusion (bring your true full self and we will change/develop based on what you bring to the table).
But I don't think those philosophical disputes should stop a girl from joining cub scouts or boy scouts if that is what works best for her. But I think parents should be aware that is still primarily a male-led program defined by males. Like all predominantly male organizations/institutions, I think it can be really rough for girls if they are a minority -- some girls are able to weather that well, but for many girls, it's stressful once they hit a certain age, especially if there are only 1-2 girls in the den/troop.
Also, I'll note that for girls that want to do some of the high adventure stuff, they should look at GIrl Scout destinations, or there are also a couple different "troops" in the DC area for teen girls that focus on high adventure activities. (I have "troop" in quotes because they aren't really troops -- they are groups that cross troop lines and bring together different girls.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The US was, until recently, one of only 13 nations that had single-gender scouting out of 216 nations with scouting programs. Just an interesting fact, but one that suggests the BSA change was a good one.
You know why that is, right? BSA did not want to band with the Girl Scouts (as had been done in the UK), because James West thought Scouting activities weren't appropriate for girls, forcing the creation of Girl Scouts as a separate organization. We should remember that many organizations like the Girl Scouts exist due to long-standing discrimination. When the larger, generally more powerful organizations (like PWIs) finally see the light and make steps to eliminate their discrimination, that does not mean we ignore their discrimination or immediately embrace them now that we're finally good enough for them.
While Boy Scouts finally broadening their views is a long time coming, it is ... interesting, shall we say? that Boy Scouts saw the light when they lost the influx of money from the Mormon church and needed to start looking elsewhere in order to keep their coffers full.
Bot just this, but the bone-deep, take-it-to-the-Supreme- Court commitment to LGBT discrimination while Girl Scouts was admitting trans kids is just conveniently handwaved away by parents who don't want to go to the trouble of actually volunteering in their kid's GSA troop. "They need money now, of course they'll stop discriminating it makes sense" isn't a reason to look the other way, but I guess any cover works if you never really cared.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please start your own GS tropp, rather than join BSA. Let's take a look, shall we: they abuse boys and move molesters around the country, cover-up the assaults, and when about to go bankrupt, come up with an idea to allow girls (the 50% they've excluded for decades, and fortunately, spared from the abuse).
The GS troop is 100% leader dependant. Get a good one and you are golden - my daughter started as a daisy and ended as a caddette, earning her gold award. Why not be a part of the solution?
Totally agree. Plus all of the girl Boy Scouts I know say they’re sort of a second thought. I’m sure that’s not universal, but it’s the total opposite of what scouting should be.
It's tough if there's already a GS troop available but it's toxic. They won't let you start a new troop if there's space available in a local one.[i][u] So you are stuck with traveling to find a new troop (so all the friends your kid makes aren't local, not to mention the added time involved), or you go to a local Boy Scout troop that welcomes girls.
Ask me how I know!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The US was, until recently, one of only 13 nations that had single-gender scouting out of 216 nations with scouting programs. Just an interesting fact, but one that suggests the BSA change was a good one.
You know why that is, right? BSA did not want to band with the Girl Scouts (as had been done in the UK), because James West thought Scouting activities weren't appropriate for girls, forcing the creation of Girl Scouts as a separate organization. We should remember that many organizations like the Girl Scouts exist due to long-standing discrimination. When the larger, generally more powerful organizations (like PWIs) finally see the light and make steps to eliminate their discrimination, that does not mean we ignore their discrimination or immediately embrace them now that we're finally good enough for them.
While Boy Scouts finally broadening their views is a long time coming, it is ... interesting, shall we say? that Boy Scouts saw the light when they lost the influx of money from the Mormon church and needed to start looking elsewhere in order to keep their coffers full.