This doesn’t sound accurate. She’s getting her calories somewhere, evidenced by the fact that she looks very thin but not skeletal.

Anonymous wrote:Seems about right. As we age we need less calories. Betting she eats a lot of protein and veggies

How does this in any way seem right? This is starvation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I appreciate she’s truthful instead of saying “I eat whatever I want in moderation!” Which we all know is bull to look like that.

Plenty of 50 year olds can eat whatever they want in moderation and be 5’9” and 137 lbs.

Really? Because I'm 50 and only one person I know 50+ can do this. And, I have a lot of friends. I routinely could eat anything, but as soon as I turned 48 I had to drastically change the diet I'd had for decades. I have no opinion on Heidi Klum or her diet, but I find your assertion is dead wrong.

What part of in moderation don’t you all understand?

The moderation pre-perimenopause and the moderation in perimenopause and beyond don't align.

The quantities might change but the concept of moderation remains the same. When I was 36, I could eat three slices of pizza for dinner. Now, at 46, I’m good with two, or often only one. One problem with spending your teens/20s/30s focusing on absolute amounts and counting calories is that you might never learn to sense that natural moderation point. It shifts as you get older, but if you know what it feels like, you shift with it.

Talk to me at 50, okay? Honestly, you're not really able to opine on this yet. BTW--I've never counted calories. Ever.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow. Granted I’m 10 years younger but I eat twice that a day and much thinner.

I doubt it.

DP. You doubt that a 40 year old can eat 1800 calories a day and be much thinner? Why? I don’t understand you people.

Anonymous wrote:Wow. Granted I’m 10 years younger but I eat twice that a day and much thinner.

I doubt it.

I am her weight and 2 inches shorter and 9 years younger.

I eat basically whatever I want but aim for moderation and gravitate to healthier foods like no red meat, little alcohol. I probably eat 1800 calories a day and exercise-walk several miles daily.

I'd say I can make my bikini body look like her body in a good photo with the right angles. Not emaciated, and I am sure her candids look even less thin (but still thin). She is healthy.

Anonymous wrote:The 900 thing was just click bait.

and boy were they successful

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I appreciate she’s truthful instead of saying “I eat whatever I want in moderation!” Which we all know is bull to look like that.

Plenty of 50 year olds can eat whatever they want in moderation and be 5’9” and 137 lbs.

Really? Because I'm 50 and only one person I know 50+ can do this. And, I have a lot of friends. I routinely could eat anything, but as soon as I turned 48 I had to drastically change the diet I'd had for decades. I have no opinion on Heidi Klum or her diet, but I find your assertion is dead wrong.

What part of in moderation don’t you all understand?

The moderation pre-perimenopause and the moderation in perimenopause and beyond don't align.

The quantities might change but the concept of moderation remains the same. When I was 36, I could eat three slices of pizza for dinner. Now, at 46, I’m good with two, or often only one. One problem with spending your teens/20s/30s focusing on absolute amounts and counting calories is that you might never learn to sense that natural moderation point. It shifts as you get older, but if you know what it feels like, you shift with it.

The 900 thing was just click bait.

Anonymous wrote:https://pagesix.com/2023/08/22/heidi-klum-reveals-weight-admits-she-eats-900-calories-a-day/amp/

Heidi Klum is 50 years old, 5’9” and 137 lbs, which puts her at a 20 BMI. But she eats 900 calories per day to stay that way. I don’t know how that’s physically possible without losing weight, but I guess bodies need way less energy at 50 than I thought.

She eats 900 and drinks 1,000 more

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I appreciate she’s truthful instead of saying “I eat whatever I want in moderation!” Which we all know is bull to look like that.

Plenty of 50 year olds can eat whatever they want in moderation and be 5’9” and 137 lbs.

Really? Because I'm 50 and only one person I know 50+ can do this. And, I have a lot of friends. I routinely could eat anything, but as soon as I turned 48 I had to drastically change the diet I'd had for decades. I have no opinion on Heidi Klum or her diet, but I find your assertion is dead wrong.

What part of in moderation don’t you all understand?

The moderation pre-perimenopause and the moderation in perimenopause and beyond don't align.

When you've destroyed your metabolism with disordered eating, this isn't that surprising.

No super model in the 90s was eating in a healthy way. If she is eating only 900 calories now, she is still not eating in a healthy way.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She looks great and healthy not anorxeaict

she looks, and based on her stats is, skinny fat. She does not look malnourished though, which is why I doubt she really only eats 900 calories.

Skinny Fat? And you wonder why so many American women have eating disorders and body dysmorphia.

Skinny fat just means a slim frame but little muscle mass, which sounds about right. (NP)

Also, I think Heidi is well below 137 lbs, I'd guess more like mid 120's. I was 5' 9" and 138-140 lbs my whole adulthood (until kids/middle age!) and I had considerably more meat on my bones!

Agreed. I'm her same height, 126lbs. I lift weights, eat clean and don't drink and I know I don't look like this. Maybe she has "heavy bones"

Based on photo posted here, I believe she is in the 130’s at 5’9. She looks thin but not too thin, and muscular with big boobs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She looks great and healthy not anorxeaict

she looks, and based on her stats is, skinny fat. She does not look malnourished though, which is why I doubt she really only eats 900 calories.

Skinny Fat? And you wonder why so many American women have eating disorders and body dysmorphia.

Skinny fat just means a slim frame but little muscle mass, which sounds about right. (NP)

Also, I think Heidi is well below 137 lbs, I'd guess more like mid 120's. I was 5' 9" and 138-140 lbs my whole adulthood (until kids/middle age!) and I had considerably more meat on my bones!

Yes, that is precisely what I meant. I never said she is big, just that her body composition is not great. She has very little muscle and her body fat percentage is likely higher than most people would expect. And that is not something to solve with an eating disorder but rather by eating and lifting.

You would think a model/AGT panelist would earn enough money she could buy a table and not have to eat off her crotch.