Anonymous wrote:I got pulled over for a headlight being out on the same day I called to report gunshots at an elementary school. Cops never showed to the scene of the gunshots.
Also I suspect many of the cars with illegal temp tags will just flee creating a public safety hazard. Kind of a catch 22.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s oppression, so no.
- and OP has repeatedly voted to hobble the police, defund them, demoralize them, restrict their ability to deter or fight crime.
Please tell us you are not a democrat, OP? (you are a dem.)
You are getting exactly what you voted for OP. Now stop whining.
Uh … no. My Councilmember ran unopposed and I wrote someone in. The last mayoral candidate I voted for was Catania. There are ZERO options for DC voters.
Maybe the Republicans should stop being a trainwreck clown car so people actually take them seriously.
Republicans had ZERO to do with the current council. In fact, Republicans did not support nor run on the “defund the police” platform your party ran on.
Democrats on their own support defunding the police; and gutting criminal Justice laws.
Your party owns his. Time for you to own it. You got exactly what you voted for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s oppression, so no.
- and OP has repeatedly voted to hobble the police, defund them, demoralize them, restrict their ability to deter or fight crime.
Please tell us you are not a democrat, OP? (you are a dem.)
You are getting exactly what you voted for OP. Now stop whining.
Uh … no. My Councilmember ran unopposed and I wrote someone in. The last mayoral candidate I voted for was Catania. There are ZERO options for DC voters.
Maybe the Republicans should stop being a trainwreck clown car so people actually take them seriously.
Republicans had ZERO to do with the current council. In fact, Republicans did not support nor run on the “defund the police” platform your party ran on.
Democrats on their own support defunding the police; and gutting criminal Justice laws.
Your party owns his. Time for you to own it. You got exactly what you voted for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s oppression, so no.
- and OP has repeatedly voted to hobble the police, defund them, demoralize them, restrict their ability to deter or fight crime.
Please tell us you are not a democrat, OP? (you are a dem.)
You are getting exactly what you voted for OP. Now stop whining.
Uh … no. My Councilmember ran unopposed and I wrote someone in. The last mayoral candidate I voted for was Catania. There are ZERO options for DC voters.
Maybe the Republicans should stop being a trainwreck clown car so people actually take them seriously.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s oppression, so no.
- and OP has repeatedly voted to hobble the police, defund them, demoralize them, restrict their ability to deter or fight crime.
Please tell us you are not a democrat, OP? (you are a dem.)
You are getting exactly what you voted for OP. Now stop whining.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, because it’s inequitable and they can’t chase.
How is it inequitable? What gives POCs the right or the excuse to drive recklessly?
The voters of dc. You quietly voted for this, over and over. Look in the mirror.
Easy for you to say but now try and back it up.
Which candidates ran on a campaign of "we won't enforce any laws!" Was there some ballot referendum on zero enforcement?
Which recent DC candidates did we fail to vote for, who were compelling, credible, electable, and had a solid campaign to take serious steps to reduce crime?
How exactly did I vote for this?
Janeese Lewis George says we can't arrest teenagers for anything, even murder, because being arrested will "traumatize" them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MPD is severely understaffed right now. Severely. To maintain bare minimum coverage, officers are sometimes being "held over" at the end of their shifts. (Held over = they are told they can't go home because they have to stay to work another shift.)
To answer your question, they are rarely doing traffic patrols because they do not have enough patrol officers. On most shifts, all the patrol officers on duty spend their whole shift answering 911 calls. They cannot take officers away from responding to 911 calls by sending them to do traffic enforcement.
If you see something dangerous or illegal, you should call it in. Then a patrol officer can be dispatched.
What a crock.
90% of the time I see a DC cop they're sitting in their car playing on their phone. The other 10% they're in line at Chipotle.
Being lazy is better than being racist, which is what they would be called for pulling over too many people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, because it’s inequitable and they can’t chase.
How is it inequitable? What gives POCs the right or the excuse to drive recklessly?
The voters of dc. You quietly voted for this, over and over. Look in the mirror.
Easy for you to say but now try and back it up.
Which candidates ran on a campaign of "we won't enforce any laws!" Was there some ballot referendum on zero enforcement?
Which recent DC candidates did we fail to vote for, who were compelling, credible, electable, and had a solid campaign to take serious steps to reduce crime?
How exactly did I vote for this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, because it’s inequitable and they can’t chase.
How is it inequitable? What gives POCs the right or the excuse to drive recklessly?
The voters of dc. You quietly voted for this, over and over. Look in the mirror.
Easy for you to say but now try and back it up.
Which candidates ran on a campaign of "we won't enforce any laws!" Was there some ballot referendum on zero enforcement?
Which recent DC candidates did we fail to vote for, who were compelling, credible, electable, and had a solid campaign to take serious steps to reduce crime?
How exactly did I vote for this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MPD is severely understaffed right now. Severely. To maintain bare minimum coverage, officers are sometimes being "held over" at the end of their shifts. (Held over = they are told they can't go home because they have to stay to work another shift.)
To answer your question, they are rarely doing traffic patrols because they do not have enough patrol officers. On most shifts, all the patrol officers on duty spend their whole shift answering 911 calls. They cannot take officers away from responding to 911 calls by sending them to do traffic enforcement.
If you see something dangerous or illegal, you should call it in. Then a patrol officer can be dispatched.
What a crock.
90% of the time I see a DC cop they're sitting in their car playing on their phone. The other 10% they're in line at Chipotle.
Anonymous wrote:MPD is severely understaffed right now. Severely. To maintain bare minimum coverage, officers are sometimes being "held over" at the end of their shifts. (Held over = they are told they can't go home because they have to stay to work another shift.)
To answer your question, they are rarely doing traffic patrols because they do not have enough patrol officers. On most shifts, all the patrol officers on duty spend their whole shift answering 911 calls. They cannot take officers away from responding to 911 calls by sending them to do traffic enforcement.
If you see something dangerous or illegal, you should call it in. Then a patrol officer can be dispatched.
Anonymous wrote:DC launched "Vision Zero" to address pedestrian deaths. I didn't realize it meant "Do Zero."
Fwiw, I'm a Dem and live in DC in a neighborhood plagued by drag racing, ATVs and loud engines. We need to see a radical about face on traffic enforcement. What if law abiding folks boycotted paying the excessive parking tickets until we see some equity in enforcement of dangerous driving that truly punishes all of us who live here?