OP here. I never considered red shirting him and would never do. He was so academically advanced as a preschooler he had to wait years for the other kids (and the teaching) to catch up with him. He’s still very advanced academically (eg taking calculus in 9th grade). Red shirting him would have just been a waste of a year. That he’s small isn’t an issue, but I am wondering about puberty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP's son is the youngest possible age for his grade as well.
This is one reason people redshirt boys with September birthdays.
+1
My DS is a late bloomer (AND one of the older kids in his grade due to bday - not redshirted) it would be even worse if he had a late bday and was sent on time.
For the parents asking about redshirting on the elementary forums, I always tell them “go and search ‘puberty’ on the teen forum”….
It isn’t the be all end all, or the most important thing in the grand scheme, but late blooming boys tend to have a very rough time during certain periods- middle school and early high school. It is something to consider.
OP here. I never considered red shirting him and would never do. He was so academically advanced as a preschooler he had to wait years for the other kids (and the teaching) to catch up with him. He’s still very advanced academically (eg taking calculus in 9th grade). Red shirting him would have just been a waste of a year. That he’s small isn’t an issue, but I am wondering about puberty.
oh FFS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP's son is the youngest possible age for his grade as well.
This is one reason people redshirt boys with September birthdays.
+1
My DS is a late bloomer (AND one of the older kids in his grade due to bday - not redshirted) it would be even worse if he had a late bday and was sent on time.
For the parents asking about redshirting on the elementary forums, I always tell them “go and search ‘puberty’ on the teen forum”….
It isn’t the be all end all, or the most important thing in the grand scheme, but late blooming boys tend to have a very rough time during certain periods- middle school and early high school. It is something to consider.
OP here. I never considered red shirting him and would never do. He was so academically advanced as a preschooler he had to wait years for the other kids (and the teaching) to catch up with him. He’s still very advanced academically (eg taking calculus in 9th grade). Red shirting him would have just been a waste of a year. That he’s small isn’t an issue, but I am wondering about puberty.
Anonymous wrote:The first thing I noticed about DS regarding puberty was his eyebrows. One day, he came down for breakfast, and I kept looking at him. There was something different about him, and I couldn't quite put my finger on it. Then it hit me: his eyebrows were darker (fair skin and reddish hair), and fuller. Prior to, his eyebrows were like a child's: thinner and lighter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP's son is the youngest possible age for his grade as well.
This is one reason people redshirt boys with September birthdays.
100% this. Some freshman kids will already be 15 or turning 15 shortly thereafter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP's son is the youngest possible age for his grade as well.
This is one reason people redshirt boys with September birthdays.
+1
My DS is a late bloomer (AND one of the older kids in his grade due to bday - not redshirted) it would be even worse if he had a late bday and was sent on time.
For the parents asking about redshirting on the elementary forums, I always tell them “go and search ‘puberty’ on the teen forum”….
It isn’t the be all end all, or the most important thing in the grand scheme, but late blooming boys tend to have a very rough time during certain periods- middle school and early high school. It is something to consider.
OP here. I never considered red shirting him and would never do. He was so academically advanced as a preschooler he had to wait years for the other kids (and the teaching) to catch up with him. He’s still very advanced academically (eg taking calculus in 9th grade). Red shirting him would have just been a waste of a year. That he’s small isn’t an issue, but I am wondering about puberty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP's son is the youngest possible age for his grade as well.
This is one reason people redshirt boys with September birthdays.
+1
My DS is a late bloomer (AND one of the older kids in his grade due to bday - not redshirted) it would be even worse if he had a late bday and was sent on time.
For the parents asking about redshirting on the elementary forums, I always tell them “go and search ‘puberty’ on the teen forum”….
It isn’t the be all end all, or the most important thing in the grand scheme, but late blooming boys tend to have a very rough time during certain periods- middle school and early high school. It is something to consider.
Anonymous wrote:OP's son is the youngest possible age for his grade as well.
This is one reason people redshirt boys with September birthdays.
Anonymous wrote:OP's son is the youngest possible age for his grade as well.
This is one reason people redshirt boys with September birthdays.
Anonymous wrote:
Agreed on talking to his ped as a more reasonable way to assuage one's concerns generally, but on the other hand, I would be willing to bet a fair amount of money that no ped is going to be like, "oh your not yet 14 year old is 5'3" and has no visible signs of puberty (based on a parent, rather than doctor's, assessment), definitely time to FTFO."
Kid is 14 next week and pediatrician appointment is a few days later, as indicated in OP, but thanks for being condescending.
How do you view those first two facts as playing in? I don't. Of course ask, but the kid is not yet even 14 and is as tall as me, a grown adult person.
Honestly, I am somewhat sorry to have been snappy, but on the other hand, as someone married to a short guy (5'5") and the mom of two boys who are likely to be short, I am pretty sick of people on DCUM pathologizing and having massive anxiety about shortness within the range of normal. It's ridiculous. If someone acted this way about a kid being slightly overweight, they would get jumped all over.
Anonymous wrote:
Agreed on talking to his ped as a more reasonable way to assuage one's concerns generally, but on the other hand, I would be willing to bet a fair amount of money that no ped is going to be like, "oh your not yet 14 year old is 5'3" and has no visible signs of puberty (based on a parent, rather than doctor's, assessment), definitely time to FTFO."
Kid is 14 next week and pediatrician appointment is a few days later, as indicated in OP, but thanks for being condescending.
How do you view those first two facts as playing in? I don't. Of course ask, but the kid is not yet even 14 and is as tall as me, a grown adult person.
Honestly, I am somewhat sorry to have been snappy, but on the other hand, as someone married to a short guy (5'5") and the mom of two boys who are likely to be short, I am pretty sick of people on DCUM pathologizing and having massive anxiety about shortness within the range of normal. It's ridiculous. If someone acted this way about a kid being slightly overweight, they would get jumped all over.