Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many of the arguments on this thread could also be applied to legacy admissions.
If Legacy goes, then faculty should start assuming that the perks for their kids are next.
These are two completely different things.
Legacy rewards kids for being born to parents who had parents who could afford to send them to an elite college during some pretty sad economic times (and conveniently dodged the draft)
Faculty hook and/or tuition break is an employment benefit - part of a benefits package and a contract. An earned benefit.
1. in both situations, it's kids being rewarded for their parent's accomplishment
2. do you think poor kids get on tenure track? Those professors usually have elite and expensive undergrad degrees as their starting point
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. I know two kids of faculty who got into their parent’s elite school in this last round. Both were admitted off the wait list. Both had decent stats but not anything that would have had admission absent a very significant hook. Neither got into any other schools at the same level, though did get into some very good schools, just not same level as the ones where their parents teach.
I can’t see getting worked up about it, but it’s quite obvious to me that being a faculty child is a huge hook.
n-count of 2 and those 2 got into other "very good schools." I don't think we should trust your "quite obvious" conclusion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many of the arguments on this thread could also be applied to legacy admissions.
If Legacy goes, then faculty should start assuming that the perks for their kids are next.
These are two completely different things.
Legacy rewards kids for being born to parents who had parents who could afford to send them to an elite college during some pretty sad economic times (and conveniently dodged the draft)
Faculty hook and/or tuition break is an employment benefit - part of a benefits package and a contract. An earned benefit.
1. in both situations, it's kids being rewarded for their parent's accomplishment
2. do you think poor kids get on tenure track? Those professors usually have elite and expensive undergrad degrees as their starting point
Why don’t I get your employee benefits?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many of the arguments on this thread could also be applied to legacy admissions.
If Legacy goes, then faculty should start assuming that the perks for their kids are next.
These are two completely different things.
Legacy rewards kids for being born to parents who had parents who could afford to send them to an elite college during some pretty sad economic times (and conveniently dodged the draft)
Faculty hook and/or tuition break is an employment benefit - part of a benefits package and a contract. An earned benefit.
1. in both situations, it's kids being rewarded for their parent's accomplishment
2. do you think poor kids get on tenure track? Those professors usually have elite and expensive undergrad degrees as their starting point
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many of the arguments on this thread could also be applied to legacy admissions.
If Legacy goes, then faculty should start assuming that the perks for their kids are next.
These are two completely different things.
Legacy rewards kids for being born to parents who had parents who could afford to send them to an elite college during some pretty sad economic times (and conveniently dodged the draft)
Faculty hook and/or tuition break is an employment benefit - part of a benefits package and a contract. An earned benefit.
Anonymous wrote:Such blatant hypocrisy. At elite colleges the professors tend to be self-righteous about social justice & helping the downtrodden. Power to the people!! But threaten THEIR privileges and they respond like Thurston Howell III being offered a wine cooler.
Anonymous wrote:NP. I know two kids of faculty who got into their parent’s elite school in this last round. Both were admitted off the wait list. Both had decent stats but not anything that would have had admission absent a very significant hook. Neither got into any other schools at the same level, though did get into some very good schools, just not same level as the ones where their parents teach.
I can’t see getting worked up about it, but it’s quite obvious to me that being a faculty child is a huge hook.
Anonymous wrote:Many of the arguments on this thread could also be applied to legacy admissions.
If Legacy goes, then faculty should start assuming that the perks for their kids are next.