Anonymous wrote:I'm confused. The reports at the time was that the jury did not conclude rape. Was this a talking point from the Trump team, or did Jean Carroll make a claim of rape as defined under New York law that the jury disagreed?
Anonymous wrote:This in consistent with his remarks in the Access Hollywood tape. "Grab them by the p*ssy. You can do anything."
Anonymous wrote:We will soon know if Trump's a convicted criminal.
We will soon know if Trump's a convicted traitor.
We know Trump's a liar.
We know Trump's a thief.
We know Trump's a racist.
We know Trump's a rapist.
Anonymous wrote:The idiotic claim made by Trump and his lawyers may end up being far more damaging politically than financially.
Now anyone can call Trump a rapist and have zero fear of being sued for defamation.
That floodgate just opened and now anyone can say it, print it in ads, shout it from rooftops, put it on billboards, and Trump can't do anything about it because it is true, as per Judge Lewis Kaplan's ruling today.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The most troublesome aspect of this development is that pre-Trump being found guilty of raping someone would have been enough to bring a quick end to someone's political candidacy. Post-Trump, it's no big deal. In what world is this acceptable?
It is a big deal. The millions of Americans that have been victimized by rape or sexual assault (or that know someone who has, which is likely almost everyone) should vote accordingly.
This should move the dial with independents in swing states, especially women. Both Roe v Wade and this rape finding together should sway more and more against Trump and the GOP.
Sure but there are plenty of sexual assaults in Blue and Red and Swing states. None of these states should be electing a rapist to the white house. Have some respect for this country.
There are voters who think being a Democrat is worse than being a rapist. Let that sink in. To them, a known rapist who is a Republican is preferable to any Democrat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The most troublesome aspect of this development is that pre-Trump being found guilty of raping someone would have been enough to bring a quick end to someone's political candidacy. Post-Trump, it's no big deal. In what world is this acceptable?
It is a big deal. The millions of Americans that have been victimized by rape or sexual assault (or that know someone who has, which is likely almost everyone) should vote accordingly.
This should move the dial with independents in swing states, especially women. Both Roe v Wade and this rape finding together should sway more and more against Trump and the GOP.
Sure but there are plenty of sexual assaults in Blue and Red and Swing states. None of these states should be electing a rapist to the white house. Have some respect for this country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The most troublesome aspect of this development is that pre-Trump being found guilty of raping someone would have been enough to bring a quick end to someone's political candidacy. Post-Trump, it's no big deal. In what world is this acceptable?
It is a big deal. The millions of Americans that have been victimized by rape or sexual assault (or that know someone who has, which is likely almost everyone) should vote accordingly.
This should move the dial with independents in swing states, especially women. Both Roe v Wade and this rape finding together should sway more and more against Trump and the GOP.
Sure but there are plenty of sexual assaults in Blue and Red and Swing states. None of these states should be electing a rapist to the white house. Have some respect for this country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The most troublesome aspect of this development is that pre-Trump being found guilty of raping someone would have been enough to bring a quick end to someone's political candidacy. Post-Trump, it's no big deal. In what world is this acceptable?
It is a big deal. The millions of Americans that have been victimized by rape or sexual assault (or that know someone who has, which is likely almost everyone) should vote accordingly.
This should move the dial with independents in swing states, especially women. Both Roe v Wade and this rape finding together should sway more and more against Trump and the GOP.
Anonymous wrote:We will soon know if Trump's a convicted criminal.
We will soon know if Trump's a convicted traitor.
We know Trump's a liar.
We know Trump's a thief.
We know Trump's a racist.
We know Trump's a rapist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The most troublesome aspect of this development is that pre-Trump being found guilty of raping someone would have been enough to bring a quick end to someone's political candidacy. Post-Trump, it's no big deal. In what world is this acceptable?
It is a big deal. The millions of Americans that have been victimized by rape or sexual assault (or that know someone who has, which is likely almost everyone) should vote accordingly.
Anonymous wrote:The most troublesome aspect of this development is that pre-Trump being found guilty of raping someone would have been enough to bring a quick end to someone's political candidacy. Post-Trump, it's no big deal. In what world is this acceptable?