Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The bottom line is that people need to stop having kids that they cannot properly take care of. I don’t know what the answer is. Maybe there should be some sort of guaranteed income if someone finishes school and attends college or a trade school before having any children. It would be cheaper for society in the long run.
A good first step is to keep abortion + contraception legal, cheap, and easy to attain.
But I see a lot of politicians trying to restrict abortion and contraception + flood the country with cheap guns. That's recipe for an army of traumatized street kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a teacher and could think of a few former students this could be. One has a mentally ill parent and another parent truly doing their best but has trauma and PTSD from the other parent. There’s a lack of mental health resources available. And at schools we’re so trauma informed we allow kids to get away with anything. I’ve seen it all in elementary school and the kids just get. a few days suspension to play video games and come back bragging about it.
The real answer to crime is what’s happening at the lower school levels. And that’s a question for city council who has eliminated all disciplinary options.
No, the question is: how do we parent better? How do we help with mental illness better?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
The 11 year-old pulled a gun on multiple people! Where TF is a 5th grade acquiring a gun?
The mom says he’s on drugs, she thinks he has psychological problems, and she can’t control him.
This kid needs to be sent to a military or remedial boarding school in the depths of Maine or Vermont for a few years to get him sorted out. Along with a full psyche eval and whatever meds are needed.
The kid is obviously a victim himself so sending him to some abusive place will not get him “sorted out” at all. If that crap worked so well we would be doing it with everyone.
This "crap" as you call it, it EXACTLY the type of re-set that middle and upper middle class families do when they have kids going off the rails. Yes, there are some abusive type places in that vein but there are also a lot of good ones. We had an increasingly violent 13 yo whom we had adopted at age 8 out of a trauma background and that was exactly what we did. After a stint in that type of environment, he came home and graduated from high school, attend trade school, and now holds down a good job. Those type of intensive high-structure/high nurture environments are where we need to be sending youthful offenders---not re-releasing them back into the communities without consequences so their behaviors will continue to escalate. But it has to be real therapy along with the intensively structured environment---not just a holding pen "baby" prison where kids can just learn worse behaviors from each other. And along with shipping a kid off to a high structure environment, there needs to be a requirement that the parent/caretaker also participate in intensive therapy and monitoring, so the kid just doesn't relapse into prior behaviors once returned to the home. Are these kinds of environments incredibly expensive to build and maintain? Absolutely. A good one costs as much per kid per year as sending a kid to Harvard. But what we are doing now isn't working.
It sorted my stepdad out. He had gotten in a lot of trouble as a teen and was on a fast track to prison. Instead he was sent into the army and it sorted him out and made him a decent and productive member of society.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“agreed to stay out of Northwest DC”? Is this the criminal justice version of NIMBY? He can be turned loose on society, as long as he doesn’t bother anyone in NW DC? Either he presents a danger to society or he doesn’t (and it appears he does).
So it's fine for him to go on crime sprees in NE, SW, and SE? What judge and what prosecutor agreed to that idiocy?
The kid has an ankle tracker. He’s probably not allowed to travel more than a certain radius from home or school. Which effectively means he’s banned from NW if he’s living in SE.
You’re missing the forest for the trees.
Anonymous wrote:Janeese Lewis George says we can’t arrest people under 18, no matter what crime they committed, because it will traumatize them.
Stop electing these crazy people to office.
Anonymous wrote:The bottom line is that people need to stop having kids that they cannot properly take care of. I don’t know what the answer is. Maybe there should be some sort of guaranteed income if someone finishes school and attends college or a trade school before having any children. It would be cheaper for society in the long run.
Anonymous wrote:I’m a teacher and could think of a few former students this could be. One has a mentally ill parent and another parent truly doing their best but has trauma and PTSD from the other parent. There’s a lack of mental health resources available. And at schools we’re so trauma informed we allow kids to get away with anything. I’ve seen it all in elementary school and the kids just get. a few days suspension to play video games and come back bragging about it.
The real answer to crime is what’s happening at the lower school levels. And that’s a question for city council who has eliminated all disciplinary options.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“agreed to stay out of Northwest DC”? Is this the criminal justice version of NIMBY? He can be turned loose on society, as long as he doesn’t bother anyone in NW DC? Either he presents a danger to society or he doesn’t (and it appears he does).
Sounds like when someone is banned from a city or county as part of a sentence. Here, it's a neighborhood or area.
Well, if someone is banned from a city or county, it’s because the community doesn’t want them. If the entire community is a neighborhood, like a HOA, then it makes sense to ban someone from the entire neighborhood community.
To my understanding, Northwest DC is not an independent community, but an integral part of DC that should be on an equal basis as the rest of the district. Why is Northwest DC considered a separate community from the rest of DC and why do they deserve more security than the rest of DC? How is this equal justice?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
The 11 year-old pulled a gun on multiple people! Where TF is a 5th grade acquiring a gun?
The mom says he’s on drugs, she thinks he has psychological problems, and she can’t control him.
This kid needs to be sent to a military or remedial boarding school in the depths of Maine or Vermont for a few years to get him sorted out. Along with a full psyche eval and whatever meds are needed.
The kid is obviously a victim himself so sending him to some abusive place will not get him “sorted out” at all. If that crap worked so well we would be doing it with everyone.
This "crap" as you call it, it EXACTLY the type of re-set that middle and upper middle class families do when they have kids going off the rails. Yes, there are some abusive type places in that vein but there are also a lot of good ones. We had an increasingly violent 13 yo whom we had adopted at age 8 out of a trauma background and that was exactly what we did. After a stint in that type of environment, he came home and graduated from high school, attend trade school, and now holds down a good job. Those type of intensive high-structure/high nurture environments are where we need to be sending youthful offenders---not re-releasing them back into the communities without consequences so their behaviors will continue to escalate. But it has to be real therapy along with the intensively structured environment---not just a holding pen "baby" prison where kids can just learn worse behaviors from each other. And along with shipping a kid off to a high structure environment, there needs to be a requirement that the parent/caretaker also participate in intensive therapy and monitoring, so the kid just doesn't relapse into prior behaviors once returned to the home. Are these kinds of environments incredibly expensive to build and maintain? Absolutely. A good one costs as much per kid per year as sending a kid to Harvard. But what we are doing now isn't working.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“agreed to stay out of Northwest DC”? Is this the criminal justice version of NIMBY? He can be turned loose on society, as long as he doesn’t bother anyone in NW DC? Either he presents a danger to society or he doesn’t (and it appears he does).
So it's fine for him to go on crime sprees in NE, SW, and SE? What judge and what prosecutor agreed to that idiocy?