Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s just another example of pharma marketing run amok. The company that makes them has found insurance will pay so they’re pushing them hard, even if borderline cases. It’s as simple as that.
Medical devices and pharma are totally different industries.
I wouldn’t say that. Numerous drugs have application specific delivery devices, for example. They all operate very similarly.
Anonymous wrote:It's the latest fad in body hacking. When people see a spike, they don't realize that the body easily handles it and instead change their diet to avoid spikes.
People who have more money than sense and not enough real problems.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CGMs get a lot of buzz on podcasts about longevity, fasting for health, nutrition and weight, etc. I would love to try one -- seems like it would yield really useful data about how one's body responds to certain foods. For example, I recently heard someone using a CGM discuss how surprised she was that an orange spiked her blood sugar as much as a candy bar. That isn't really intuitive, imo.
You may be seeing more of them because there's a Silicon Valley startup (Levels) that recently made them more affordable and accessible for those without the medical conditions to get a prescription and insurance coverage.
In Canada, where no prescription is required and the devices are cheaper, they've been trending for a while.
The thing is, some foods spike the blood sugar and then it goes back down. That's fine. Totally fine.
The only issue is when your blood sugar is high (above 200) for hours and hours. And endocrinologists don't really care about that either if it comes down eventually. You're diabetic at that point but not medically treatable. So they don't want to see you.
Anonymous wrote:Half the country is either diabetic or about to become one so these things (CGM) are great, original poster is frankly most likely a part of the problem. Her concern is about appearances, lol.
https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/index.html
Anonymous wrote:CGMs get a lot of buzz on podcasts about longevity, fasting for health, nutrition and weight, etc. I would love to try one -- seems like it would yield really useful data about how one's body responds to certain foods. For example, I recently heard someone using a CGM discuss how surprised she was that an orange spiked her blood sugar as much as a candy bar. That isn't really intuitive, imo.
You may be seeing more of them because there's a Silicon Valley startup (Levels) that recently made them more affordable and accessible for those without the medical conditions to get a prescription and insurance coverage.
In Canada, where no prescription is required and the devices are cheaper, they've been trending for a while.
Anonymous wrote:CGMs get a lot of buzz on podcasts about longevity, fasting for health, nutrition and weight, etc. I would love to try one -- seems like it would yield really useful data about how one's body responds to certain foods. For example, I recently heard someone using a CGM discuss how surprised she was that an orange spiked her blood sugar as much as a candy bar. That isn't really intuitive, imo.
You may be seeing more of them because there's a Silicon Valley startup (Levels) that recently made them more affordable and accessible for those without the medical conditions to get a prescription and insurance coverage.
In Canada, where no prescription is required and the devices are cheaper, they've been trending for a while.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s just another example of pharma marketing run amok. The company that makes them has found insurance will pay so they’re pushing them hard, even if borderline cases. It’s as simple as that.
Medical devices and pharma are totally different industries.
I wouldn’t say that. Numerous drugs have application specific delivery devices, for example. They all operate very similarly.
Anonymous wrote:Genuinely curious, why would someone feel the need to hide this? And why do you guys feel like they should? Like who cares? The poster that said it was weird, why is it weird?
Anonymous wrote:CGMs get a lot of buzz on podcasts about longevity, fasting for health, nutrition and weight, etc. I would love to try one -- seems like it would yield really useful data about how one's body responds to certain foods. For example, I recently heard someone using a CGM discuss how surprised she was that an orange spiked her blood sugar as much as a candy bar. That isn't really intuitive, imo.
You may be seeing more of them because there's a Silicon Valley startup (Levels) that recently made them more affordable and accessible for those without the medical conditions to get a prescription and insurance coverage.
In Canada, where no prescription is required and the devices are cheaper, they've been trending for a while.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s just another example of pharma marketing run amok. The company that makes them has found insurance will pay so they’re pushing them hard, even if borderline cases. It’s as simple as that.
Medical devices and pharma are totally different industries.
Anonymous wrote:It’s just another example of pharma marketing run amok. The company that makes them has found insurance will pay so they’re pushing them hard, even if borderline cases. It’s as simple as that.