Anonymous wrote:There are two large contributing factors.
First, in the past SPED students were separated from genpop. While it was terrible for the SPED students, it was good for the gen pop. We have now swung too far in the other direction. We have now incorporated the SPED students in the gen pop. While that is good for most of the SPED students, there are some SPED students who are too far outside the social norms that teachers can handle and we are requiring the teachers to keep them there. I have a child who was in a class with one of these way too difficult SPED children and at least every other day, the students had to be evacuated from the room when the child became violent and the teacher was not allowed to discipline or restrict the child. The other 22 children had to them go and sit in the hallway while a SPED teacher was brought from another assignment to come and deal with the child. The other 22 children lost valuable learning time repeatedly for this one child. We need to be able to find a middle ground. Incorporate the SPED students into the gen pop, but when some children because a danger to the teacher and other students, they should be removed from the general classroom and and alternative learning plan needs to be developed for that child. This bending over backwards to accommodate is not at all fair to the larger population of students who have to deal with these children. Now the policies towards SPED children are often dictated at the state level and not at the county/school district level. This needs to be addressed by the state school superintendent, but it is not political advantageous to do so.
Second, entitled parents have become worse. I know several MCPS teachers who have said that they have a lot of problems maintaining discipline in classrooms because the attitude of the school district is now to cave to whiny entitled parents. Children are children. Teachers try to discipline them and the child complains at home. In the past, many parents would try to then deal with the situation at home, teach their children manners, teach them how to cope and move on. Now, many of those entitled parents demand meetings with the teacher and/or administration and complain about how their little snowflake was treated in class. And the administration is caving to them and changing the way that teachers deal with such children and restricting teachers from maintaining discipline in class. My friends tell me the number of difficult parents has been on a steady rise for some time now and there is no evidence of it declining.
So, MD state needs to address the SPED problem and there needs to be a way to curb the overentitled parents for the situation to change.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's almost like a hugely disruptive global pandemic is continuing to have disruptive effects...
It’s almost as though my kid didn’t have those issues at her private school this past year.
But sure. Continue to pretend it’s like that everywhere.
It's almost like schools that can choose whom to admit and whom to kick out have fewer disruptive students than public schools that are required to accept everyone.
When I was a kid, they disciplined disruptive kids and separated out kids who are unable to sit quietly to learn. Consequently I actually learned something from real hard copy textbooks and teachers actually taught grammar and we read high quality works.
I feel sorry for sped students who are unable to sit quietly to learn and end up wandering around the classroom, and then often meltdown by the end of the day. How is this good for the sped student? The class atmosphere is inappropriate for them and it is difficult for neurotypical students to learn in this environment.
Suspensions were a serious matter and too many could lead to being expelled. Consequently, the well behaved students were rewarded for their good behavior and the disruptive students faced consequences.
Exactly. Public schools can do quite a bit, up to and including expulsions. They just choose not to.
Public schools cannot expel elementary schoolers, or at least not without a massive struggle. Nor do we want them to be able to expel elementary schoolers because that's terrible for society.
Many of us are not suggesting expelling them, but segregating them. Students are in the general population until they become a danger to the teacher and/or other students. Children who exhibit violence need to be taken out of the general population and put into classes where SPED teachers can work with them. In many cases, these children are overstimulated in the general population. Having a child with sensory issues in a busy classroom with 24 other children, the associated noise and commotion, may be too much for them to handle and putting them into a smaller population with more focused attention from an educator that is trained to handle them is a better use of time and resources for everyone involved.
Federal law entitles a student with a disability to a free appropriate public education. There is no asterisk for *except if the student bothers other students.
Anonymous wrote:There are two large contributing factors.
First, in the past SPED students were separated from genpop. While it was terrible for the SPED students, it was good for the gen pop. We have now swung too far in the other direction. We have now incorporated the SPED students in the gen pop. While that is good for most of the SPED students, there are some SPED students who are too far outside the social norms that teachers can handle and we are requiring the teachers to keep them there. I have a child who was in a class with one of these way too difficult SPED children and at least every other day, the students had to be evacuated from the room when the child became violent and the teacher was not allowed to discipline or restrict the child. The other 22 children had to them go and sit in the hallway while a SPED teacher was brought from another assignment to come and deal with the child. The other 22 children lost valuable learning time repeatedly for this one child. We need to be able to find a middle ground. Incorporate the SPED students into the gen pop, but when some children because a danger to the teacher and other students, they should be removed from the general classroom and and alternative learning plan needs to be developed for that child. This bending over backwards to accommodate is not at all fair to the larger population of students who have to deal with these children. Now the policies towards SPED children are often dictated at the state level and not at the county/school district level. This needs to be addressed by the state school superintendent, but it is not political advantageous to do so.
Second, entitled parents have become worse. I know several MCPS teachers who have said that they have a lot of problems maintaining discipline in classrooms because the attitude of the school district is now to cave to whiny entitled parents. Children are children. Teachers try to discipline them and the child complains at home. In the past, many parents would try to then deal with the situation at home, teach their children manners, teach them how to cope and move on. Now, many of those entitled parents demand meetings with the teacher and/or administration and complain about how their little snowflake was treated in class. And the administration is caving to them and changing the way that teachers deal with such children and restricting teachers from maintaining discipline in class. My friends tell me the number of difficult parents has been on a steady rise for some time now and there is no evidence of it declining.
So, MD state needs to address the SPED problem and there needs to be a way to curb the overentitled parents for the situation to change.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I finally was able to get my child placed in a nonpublic setting after 15 months. As the parent, I was begging for a placement change. Being in a class of 28 kids was too overwhelming for my child and on a daily basis there was the flight or fight response.
As for discipline, schools cannot do anything. Then can call the parents to come and get them or have them sit in an office but that's it. Its a catch 22---if the child is out of the classroom a significant amount, a smart parent will argue that FAPE is not being provided and then the school needs to provide an IEP. IEPs cost the schools money, they aren't staffed for it, and they cannot support the IEPs that they currently have so they don't want to create more so they don't create a situation where a parent can argue that their child needs one.
I eventually pulled my son from his school and got approved for homebound instruction while I waited for placement. Here's the thing though--I had the ability to work from home and supervise my kid all day. On homebound instruction, an adult must be in the house while the teacher is there. If you don't have this flexibility, homebound is not an option for your family.
We moved from gen ed, to self contained class, to non public. What surprised me most is how small these classes are. His self contained class had 10 kids. His non public has 5. That's it--for the entire grade. There has to be room in these programs for more kids. Or expand the self contained classrooms to more schools.
I know there are more kids that need this type of support. I believe that if classes were smaller a lot of the behaviors would go away. Certainly not for all kids, but for a lot of them. I think we all can agree that smaller classes would benefit all kids. But that's not going to happen in MCPS.
On another thread, someone asked if you would pay extra taxes for increased special ed services. I wouldn't for special ed but I would for smaller classes for everyone.
Can you clarify what you mean by non public? Is that a charter school? Private? School paid with public funding? Free school provided by private benefactors?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not about a sped kid acting out.
It's about the teacher not maintaining control of the class.
Incorrect. Some students are so out of control, so often, it takes more than one person to help. For example, in my class last year, I was fine with 17 of my students. But the other two were a different story. There was often 3-4 other adults in the room on a daily basis attempting to calm those two kids (mostly unsuccessfully). When the behavior specialist, the sped teacher, the principal and a TA can't get a kid to stop raging, there's something more going on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's almost like a hugely disruptive global pandemic is continuing to have disruptive effects...
This stuff was happening before the pandemic. Every year in elementary, my kids have had 1-2 disruptive kids in their class that demand disproportionate amounts of teacher attention. Maybe coincidence, but the kids are always the children of single mothers, and I've noticed quite a few of them move to different schools after a year or two.
Anonymous wrote:I finally was able to get my child placed in a nonpublic setting after 15 months. As the parent, I was begging for a placement change. Being in a class of 28 kids was too overwhelming for my child and on a daily basis there was the flight or fight response.
As for discipline, schools cannot do anything. Then can call the parents to come and get them or have them sit in an office but that's it. Its a catch 22---if the child is out of the classroom a significant amount, a smart parent will argue that FAPE is not being provided and then the school needs to provide an IEP. IEPs cost the schools money, they aren't staffed for it, and they cannot support the IEPs that they currently have so they don't want to create more so they don't create a situation where a parent can argue that their child needs one.
I eventually pulled my son from his school and got approved for homebound instruction while I waited for placement. Here's the thing though--I had the ability to work from home and supervise my kid all day. On homebound instruction, an adult must be in the house while the teacher is there. If you don't have this flexibility, homebound is not an option for your family.
We moved from gen ed, to self contained class, to non public. What surprised me most is how small these classes are. His self contained class had 10 kids. His non public has 5. That's it--for the entire grade. There has to be room in these programs for more kids. Or expand the self contained classrooms to more schools.
I know there are more kids that need this type of support. I believe that if classes were smaller a lot of the behaviors would go away. Certainly not for all kids, but for a lot of them. I think we all can agree that smaller classes would benefit all kids. But that's not going to happen in MCPS.
On another thread, someone asked if you would pay extra taxes for increased special ed services. I wouldn't for special ed but I would for smaller classes for everyone.
Anonymous wrote:It's not about a sped kid acting out.
It's about the teacher not maintaining control of the class.
Anonymous wrote:It's not about a sped kid acting out.
It's about the teacher not maintaining control of the class.