Anonymous wrote:I do think there are a few waiting for her to retire.
Anonymous wrote:What about Charles Allen? Congress is literally located in his district, so it makes sense.
Anonymous wrote:No one wants the job. It’s a terrible job that pays very little compared to what those would actually be good at it and want it would be paid somewhere else.
Anonymous wrote:What about Charles Allen? Congress is literally located in his district, so it makes sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone I know who's gone to her for constituent services has had a terrible experience. I've personally been ghosted by her office. People (rightfully) complain about a lack of a vote, but there are plenty of other services Congressional offices provide that hers completely drops the ball on.
For all the talk about representation there seems to be a depressingly little focus on how unresponsive the people we currently elect to represent us are.
Ya know, I hate to pile on here but this was actually true in our case. I don’t want to go into any detail, but my family did once reach out to her with a constituent issue (we are all DC residents) and yes, we were completely ghosted. Totally ignored. I was stunned.
I haven’t voted for her since.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s Bowser’s job for the taking. 💯
If you think and executive who was in charge of a world capital city with a $4B budget would enjoy being a powerless member of congress, well, then you don’t know what the members of Congress job is actually like.
You don’t think she would want the visibility of being in Congress?
No one outside of DC thinks of Eleanor Holmes Norton as actually being in Congress since she can do nothing of importance.
Anonymous wrote:Andrew Auerbach would be a good replacement. He has been on HPRB for years and is close to Frumin and Cheh.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s Bowser’s job for the taking. 💯
If you think and executive who was in charge of a world capital city with a $4B budget would enjoy being a powerless member of congress, well, then you don’t know what the members of Congress job is actually like.
You don’t think she would want the visibility of being in Congress?
No one outside of DC thinks of Eleanor Holmes Norton as actually being in Congress since she can do nothing of importance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s Bowser’s job for the taking. 💯
If you think and executive who was in charge of a world capital city with a $4B budget would enjoy being a powerless member of congress, well, then you don’t know what the members of Congress job is actually like.
You don’t think she would want the visibility of being in Congress?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stephen Colbert
Is this a joke?