Anonymous wrote:Are you the spouse or what? Because you’re not being very clear.
If the $130k being taken out each year is actually overhead and not a capital contribution then the partners aren’t making $800k a year - they’re making $670k. Such bullshit, probably designed to make them look better for AmLaw purposes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The way we did it was taking a year or two, really cutting back on spending and increasing saving, and getting ahead of it. There are lots of possible permutations based on comp structure, but unfortunately, they all come down to this. It stinks for that year, OP, but it's a lot less stressful once you do it.
Yes, but as I said in my earlier posts, that’s not an option as the expenses are fixed. They cannot be altered.
This is true, private school tuition is essential and houses can’t be sold.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The way we did it was taking a year or two, really cutting back on spending and increasing saving, and getting ahead of it. There are lots of possible permutations based on comp structure, but unfortunately, they all come down to this. It stinks for that year, OP, but it's a lot less stressful once you do it.
Yes, but as I said in my earlier posts, that’s not an option as the expenses are fixed. They cannot be altered.
This is true, private school tuition is essential and houses can’t be sold.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The way we did it was taking a year or two, really cutting back on spending and increasing saving, and getting ahead of it. There are lots of possible permutations based on comp structure, but unfortunately, they all come down to this. It stinks for that year, OP, but it's a lot less stressful once you do it.
Yes, but as I said in my earlier posts, that’s not an option as the expenses are fixed. They cannot be altered.
Anonymous wrote:Your tax withholding sounds really high for that income. I bet it is incorrect.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP it sounds like you’re spending more than you earn and didn’t ask any detailed questions about compensation in your new job.
What do you want? We can surmise that the house is an expensive house in a good school district. Send one or both kids to public school for a few years. Or refinance your house. Or apply for financial aid. Whatever.
Well, if you read my actual post, I asked if anyone else struggled at first and when it changed.
Most people were coming from being highly compensated senior associates and non-equity partners and had, you know, savings before doubling down on the mansion and private school. Its not fair that people can be this stupid and still be rich.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP it sounds like you’re spending more than you earn and didn’t ask any detailed questions about compensation in your new job.
What do you want? We can surmise that the house is an expensive house in a good school district. Send one or both kids to public school for a few years. Or refinance your house. Or apply for financial aid. Whatever.
Well, if you read my actual post, I asked if anyone else struggled at first and when it changed.
Huh? Stop what? I tried to help OP. This was my first post on this thread and I'm an attorney. I experienced the 2008 recession at a big firm, so I'm probably more conservative than most, but it doesn't sound like OP can keep going the way she is without going into a financial hole. I personally wouldn't do that as I always want a cushion but, as I said, I'm also financially cautious having been at a firm in bad times.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, all of these answers are going to be firm and practice group dependant, as well as a function of the economy. No one here is going to be able to tell you. He should ask his peers a few years ahead of him.
Personally, I'd pull the kids from private. They'll be fine in public school for a few years.
You should also consider stepping back up to FT work. You can't afford to be PT right now.
You can always switch back if his pay increases, but don't spend yourself into a hole. What if the economy tanks? He'll be the first partner walked out (and yes, that does happen).
Just stop. None of this is necessary. Honestly you sound jealous.
Anonymous wrote:OP, all of these answers are going to be firm and practice group dependant, as well as a function of the economy. No one here is going to be able to tell you. He should ask his peers a few years ahead of him.
Personally, I'd pull the kids from private. They'll be fine in public school for a few years.
You should also consider stepping back up to FT work. You can't afford to be PT right now.
You can always switch back if his pay increases, but don't spend yourself into a hole. What if the economy tanks? He'll be the first partner walked out (and yes, that does happen).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP it sounds like you’re spending more than you earn and didn’t ask any detailed questions about compensation in your new job.
What do you want? We can surmise that the house is an expensive house in a good school district. Send one or both kids to public school for a few years. Or refinance your house. Or apply for financial aid. Whatever.
Well, if you read my actual post, I asked if anyone else struggled at first and when it changed.
Anonymous wrote:OP it sounds like you’re spending more than you earn and didn’t ask any detailed questions about compensation in your new job.
What do you want? We can surmise that the house is an expensive house in a good school district. Send one or both kids to public school for a few years. Or refinance your house. Or apply for financial aid. Whatever.