Anonymous wrote:Law requires a lower IQ and hence is easier to do
Anonymous wrote:Law requires different skills than does tech.
Anonymous wrote:Law requires a lower IQ and hence is easier to do
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lawyers aren’t smart enough to do tech
Thr former tech lawyers I know are barely smart enough to do law in many cases. One former Stanford electrical engineer I went to a T10 law school with graduated in the bottom of our class, got a summer job anyway, got no offered, and now doesn’t practice.
This is something I have been hearing about STEM vs Poly Sci/History/English degrees. The STEM kids take a mid-level History class thinking they will walk into an A because their avg class requires lots of busy math work then there is a real chance of gettin a D or F (because of how the professor tests more than anything). Where the History class requires a couple papers that the STEM kid gets a C in because they dont know how to write (both on basic structure level and a support a thesis college level). But the history professor is much less willing to fail a paper that has an opinion aspect/(s)he has to subjectively judge than a STEM test where there is a right or wrong answer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am lawyer - why did I prefer it over tech? It's my interest.
Same. I’d be miserable in tech but I love being a lawyer.
And, I have to call the help desk for tech support and I know they think I am an idiot but they're nice about it - it keeps them in a job
IT help desk people are not in the Tech roles that OP is referring to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am lawyer - why did I prefer it over tech? It's my interest.
Same. I’d be miserable in tech but I love being a lawyer.
And, I have to call the help desk for tech support and I know they think I am an idiot but they're nice about it - it keeps them in a job
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am lawyer - why did I prefer it over tech? It's my interest.
Same. I’d be miserable in tech but I love being a lawyer.
Anonymous wrote:He basically landed the tech equivalent of a big law job. The tech workers at the defense contractors and retail banks are making good money but not FAANG money. The alt comparison would be big law vs FAANG. Tech workers don’t have as much opportunity to break past $3XX,000 but seem to be able to stick around there longer. And the work seems closer to 40-50 hours (not sure what roles get hit hard with crunch). We also saw that FAANG isnt afraid to lay off SWEs en mass if things slow down.
In big law, you have the opportunity to make 7 figures but you have other downsides. You work more hours, have a smaller chance of getting to 7 figures (and inhouse seems to start between $160-200k if you bail), and you have to pay off your student loans so you associate big law salary isnt as big as it appears on paper. Lastly, law seems to have the biggest delta between what you think you will do based on how its presented to the public, what schooling teaches you, and what its actually like. Tech seems pretty straightforward in what to expect