Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there some link that there is even a proposed raise, and if so what is the amount? I have no idea if OP is just making s h I t up to stir the pot.

By the time you figure anything out, they’ll have already given themselves a raise, dope.

Aren’t you lovely? So you are just here to make s h I t up. Got it.

The full text of the proposed raise got posted on the agenda for the School Board’s meeting tomorrow night over the weekend. No one is making anything up but you are clearly too stupid to acknowledge that.

It didn't just get posted. It has been posted. You just now figured it out. I've known about this for over a week because I read the agendas.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there some link that there is even a proposed raise, and if so what is the amount? I have no idea if OP is just making s h I t up to stir the pot.

By the time you figure anything out, they’ll have already given themselves a raise, dope.

Aren’t you lovely? So you are just here to make s h I t up. Got it.

The full text of the proposed raise got posted on the agenda for the School Board’s meeting tomorrow night over the weekend. No one is making anything up but you are clearly too stupid to acknowledge that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Many of the FCPS SB members I know work at least as many hours as a full time job. If you don’t pay them a living wage, then the only people who will run are privileged people who can afford to work for a small amount of money - retirees, wealthy people, stay at home moms, etc. or by people who have to work another job to make ends meet and don’t have the time to commit to the SB. I think the community would best be represented by people with skills and experience who view the job as a full time paid position.

+1 I want SB member to be a well-paid position because, otherwise, the types of people who are currently on the school board are going to be … the only people on the school board. Pay it like a full time job, because it basically is one, and you’ll get candidates who want to take the job seriously as a full time job and aren’t limited by not being independently wealthy. Not just use it as a stepping stone to whatever else.

The SB should oversee and advise, but I disagree that it should be a FT job. The stepping stone-seekers will always seek out this position, because Fairfax. We need Dr. Reid and the other high paid staff at Gatehouse to lead—not the SB and especially not this SB.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there some link that there is even a proposed raise, and if so what is the amount? I have no idea if OP is just making s h I t up to stir the pot.

By the time you figure anything out, they’ll have already given themselves a raise, dope.

Aren’t you lovely? So you are just here to make s h I t up. Got it.

Anonymous wrote:they get paid very little and this is why no one who is qualified wants the job. they should pay more to attract some talent.

Anonymous wrote:These people do not deserve to make $60K when all they do is accelerate the decline of FCPS.

Anonymous wrote:With next to no advance notice the School Board is proposing to award themselves 77% pay increases to over $60K at tomorrow night’s meeting.

They’ve clearly turned what was intended to be a part-time job into a full-time job by scheduling meetings at times that discourage people with real jobs from seeking office. But they haven’t done anything that warrants this type of pay increase. It seems obscene.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The entire School Board approach to education policy needs to be done away with. What are the benefits to having an elected board who only get their position through name recognition and political party fundraising?

We'd be far better off having real professionals with real degrees who are hired competitively into Board-like roles to represent each district. This would also remove bias and conflict of interest as each representative would likely be independent instead of having hidden agendas for their children's pyramids.

I remember when the SB wasn’t an elected position and so many people were thankful that it was changing to an elected one.

That was decades ago and whatever hopes people had that elected members would turn out to be an improvement have long since been dashed. You could not come up with a worse group of people than the current members - and the way in which they are going about increasing their own salaries is just more evidence of this. They stick kids in trailers and want to be paid more than many full-time employees. They are disgusting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there some link that there is even a proposed raise, and if so what is the amount? I have no idea if OP is just making s h I t up to stir the pot.

By the time you figure anything out, they’ll have already given themselves a raise, dope.

Anonymous wrote:Is there some link that there is even a proposed raise, and if so what is the amount? I have no idea if OP is just making s h I t up to stir the pot.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Many of the FCPS SB members I know work at least as many hours as a full time job. If you don’t pay them a living wage, then the only people who will run are privileged people who can afford to work for a small amount of money - retirees, wealthy people, stay at home moms, etc. or by people who have to work another job to make ends meet and don’t have the time to commit to the SB. I think the community would best be represented by people with skills and experience who view the job as a full time paid position.

+1 I want SB member to be a well-paid position because, otherwise, the types of people who are currently on the school board are going to be … the only people on the school board. Pay it like a full time job, because it basically is one, and you’ll get candidates who want to take the job seriously as a full time job and aren’t limited by not being independently wealthy. Not just use it as a stepping stone to whatever else.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The entire School Board approach to education policy needs to be done away with. What are the benefits to having an elected board who only get their position through name recognition and political party fundraising?

We'd be far better off having real professionals with real degrees who are hired competitively into Board-like roles to represent each district. This would also remove bias and conflict of interest as each representative would likely be independent instead of having hidden agendas for their children's pyramids.

I remember when the SB wasn’t an elected position and so many people were thankful that it was changing to an elected one.

That was decades ago and whatever hopes people had that elected members would turn out to be an improvement have long since been dashed. You could not come up with a worse group of people than the current members - and the way in which they are going about increasing their own salaries is just more evidence of this. They stick kids in trailers and want to be paid more than many full-time employees. They are disgusting.

Are there many candidates vying for these positions? Are they better?

They aren't needed. Just do away with them and have the BOS with a school specialist on their team.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t mind the pay increase because the $32,000 they make is way too little for the amount of time they spend. They have lots of meetings and people email and call them and expect immediate constituent responses. I hope the pay increase means some regular people can now try for the job, not just connected politician wannabes.

The law limits when they can give themselves raises and they haven’t had one since 2015. There’s only 12 of them so it makes no sense to compare it to staff raises.

It’s not a coincidence that they waited until after the June 20th deadline to register to run in the fall elections had passed before they dropped this bombshell. So the additional candidates that you seem to think a higher salary might elicit won’t be the ones making these ridiculous salaries. It will more likely be incompetent chumps like Karl Frisch and flakes like Melanie Meren, who have been total failures in office.

These people should be utterly ashamed of themselves.